Unit 4: Remedies Flashcards
Compensation for torts that are actionable per se
The wrong to the claimant may be recognised by an award of nominal damages, a token amount of money.
General principles of compensatory damages
- Measure of damages
- Mitigation of loss
- The One Action Rule
- General and special damages
The one action rule
A claimant can bring only one claim based on one set of facts, meaning that the court will award a single lump sum to cover both losses already suffered up to the time of trail and losses which the claimant is expected to suffer in the future. (A continuing tort is different.)
Special damages
Those losses which are capable of being calculated precisely at the time of trial and which are stated in the form of a calculation.
General damages
Those losses which are not capable of being calculated precisely and are therefore left to the court to determine. Includes pain, suffering and loss of amenity and all losses incurred after the trial.
Pecuniary losses
Those which are capable of mathematical calculation in money terms.
Non-pecuniary losses
Those which are not capable of being calculated in money terms, eg pain and suffering.
Pain and suffering (damages for personal injury)
Covers past, present, future pain. Also anguish of knowing your life expectancy has been cut short - Administration of Justice Act 1982. In the case of Wise v Kaye [1962], there is a subjective test for awarding a sum - being aware of the injuries, so an unconscious (eg coma) claimant would not be able to claim.
Loss of amenity (damages for personal injury)
Eg loss of freedom of movement, sight, smell. There is an objective test under West v Shephard [1964], able to claim conscious or not.
Medical expenses
If incurred pre-trial they will be special damages, if to be incurred post-trial they will be general damages. Can claim for any reasonable medical expenses. Can recover reasonable cost of private medical treatment under Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act 1948.
Loss of earnings post-trial
The net annual loss is known as the ‘multiplicand’. Then the period of time that the claimant will lose this money is called the ‘multiplier’. Want to avoid over-compensating.
Loss of earnings for lost years
When life expectancy and therefore working time is cut short. Can claim this as in Pickett v British Rail Engineering [1980]. There is a deduction for what the claimant would have spent on themselves, so 25% for a person married with dependant children and 33% for those with no dependants.
Claiming services post injury
Eg housework, nursing care. Can be recovered as in Schneider v Eisovitch [1960]. Housecroft v Burnett [1986] for when a spouse or relative does the caring.
Loss of earning capacity
Smith v Manchester Corporation - an award to compensate for the disadvantage from disability on the job market.
Exceptions from deductions from damages
- insurance payments
- ill-health pensions
- charitable payments
So as to not discourage people from getting insurances or making charitable payments.