Unit 4: AOS 2 Flashcards
rubber stamp
majority in both houses. bill doesn’t receive enough scrutiny. limit review. government planned legislation achieved.
hostile upper house
extra scrutiny to bills. obstruct government legislation program.
hung upper house
cross benchers are even a large amount of power. hold balance of power. delays in government legislation. laws represent greater variety of views.
committee system
economy and infrastructure, environment, planning, legal and social issues
factors that affect the ability of parliament to make law (4)
- the roles of the houses of parliament
- the representative nature of parliament
- political pressures
- restrictions on the law-making powers of parliament
the roles of the houses of parliament (4)
- effectiveness of upper house
- effectiveness of lower house
- law making process
- committee
the representative nature of parliament
- meaning of representative parliament
- views of majority
- regular elections
- compulsory voting
- limited time and resources
political pressures
- domestic
- internal
- international
restrictions on law making power
- jurisdictional limitations
- specific prohibitions
- law making process
role of victorian courts in law-making
developing and avoiding precedent
role of high court in law-making
precedent
statutory interpretation
reasons -mistakes in drafting the bill -broad wording -act that is not relevant to current societal values -change of nature of words effects -words given meaning -creates new precedent -extend the law (taste dam) or narrow (studded belt)
factors that affect the ability of courts to make law (5)
-doctrine of precedent
-judicial conservatism
-judicial activism
-costs and time in bringing a case to court
-the requirement for
standing
features of the relationship between courts and parliament in law-making (5)
- the supremacy of parliament
- the ability of courts to influence parliament
- the interpretation of statutes by courts
- the codification of common law
- the abrogation of common law
doctrine of precedent
where a superior court establishes a new legal principle that is binding on inferior courts in the same hierarchy in similar fact cases, in an area where no law (legislation or precedent) exists.
judicial conservatism
where a judge has the opportunity to change or extend the law, but is reluctant to do so. e.g. rape in marriage case bc marriage=consent
judicial activism
where a judge is prepared to make a change in law when a suitable dispute comes before them. e.g. Mabo case