UNIT 4 - AOS 1A Flashcards
Magistrate’s court - original jurisdiction
CIVIL
damages between 10,000 - 100,000
in all civil matters including personal injury,negligence,breach of contract.
CRIMINAL
- summary offences eg. traffic offences, drunk and disorderly
- indictable offences heard summarily e.g. drug offences, robbery, burglary, handling stolen goods.
- bail applications
- issuing warrants
Magistrate’s court - appellate jurisdiction
- no appellate jurisdiction
- rehearings can take place in some cases such as one parties not appearing
County court - original jurisdiction
CIVIL
- unlimited in all civil matters (one judge w/ optional jury of six)
CRIMINAL
- indictable offences, except murder, attempted murder, conspiracies, corporate offences
HEARD BEFORE JUDGE AND JURY OF 12
County court - appellate jurisdiction
CIVIL
- no appeals, unless under specific act
CRIMINAL
- from magistrates court against a conviction or sentence, bond or constitutional discharge (one judge)
Supreme Court (trial) - original jurisdiction
CIVIL - unlimited in all civil matters (one justice, optional jury of 6) CRIMINAL - most serious indictable offences murder,attempted murder,manslaughter,treason,conspiracy,corporate offences HEARD BY JUDGE + JURY OF 12
Supreme Court (trial) - appellate jurisdiction
CIVIL - on points of law from magistrates and - on points of law from VCAT CRIMINAL - on points of law from Magistrate's courts (one justice)
Supreme Court (Appeal) - original jurisdiction
no original jurisdiction
Supreme Court (Appeal) - appellate jurisdiction
CIVIL - on point of law - on question of fact - on amount of damages COUNTY - SINGLE JUDGE SUPREME - SINGLE JUDGE APPEALS HEARD BY THREE APPEAL JUSTICES
CRIMINAL - on points of law - conviction - on severity or leniency of sanction COUNTY - SINGLE JUDGE SUPREME - SINGLE JUDGE APPEALS ARE HEARD BY THREE APPEAL JUSTICES
list reasons for court hierarchy
- doctrine of precedent
- appeals
- administrative convenience
- specialisation
reasons for court hierarchy - doctrine of precedent
means that decisions made in higher courts are binding on lower courts in the same hierarchy
provides consistency and predictability
this system would not be possible w/o hierarchy because there would be no higher courts to make binding precedents on lower courts
reasons for court hierarchy - appeals
someone who is dissatisfied with a decision, if there are groups for appeal
if there were no higher courts in a hierarchy then a system of appeals would not operate, and may create unfairness and inconsistencies
reasons for court hierarchy - administrative convenience
the system of court hierarchy allows for the distribution of cases according to their seriousness
the more serious and complex = high court
minor cases heard quickly = lower courts
list divisions of magistrates court
- koori court
- family violence court division
koori court - magistrates court
Established to provide fair,equitable and culturally relevant justice services to indigenous community as well as providing greater protection and participation in sentencing.
The accused must be indigenous and offence must be within jurisdiction go Magistrates court other than sexual offences, family violence or breach.
The accused must intend or plead guilty and take responsibility for their actions
The court must ensure that proceedings are understood by accused and family
community elders advise the court on aboriginal cultural issues
The family violence court division - magistrates court
established to simplify access to justice system or people affected by family violence and promote safety.
emphasis on making those who have committed family violence acts are responsible and want to be helped
The court has the jurisdiction to deal with:
- proceedings for a family violence intervention order,counselling or breaches of existing orders
- civil proceedings with respect to damage or personal injury