Unit 3.6 Social & Welfare Reforms: Pressure & Action 1880-1914 Flashcards
Key facts about Charles Booth?
-Wise entrepreneur
-Social conscience
-Believed that the poor were in distress through circumstances beyond their own control - poverty was not the fault of the poor
-1855 Mansion House Enquiry into Unemployment
What was the 1855 Mansion House Enquiry into Unemployment?
-1855 - severe economic slump, which led to widespread unemployment - discontent and concerns about poverty and potential social unrest, prompted authorities and reformers to investigate the situation
-It emphasized the need for systemic reforms, including improved access to relief efforts and potential public works programs to provide temporary employment.
-its recommendations were constrained by Victorian attitudes toward poverty - blamed the unemployed for their situation
-laid the groundwork for later discussions about social welfare and labor rights
Facts about Booths investigation?
-17 year long study but was meant to be 3 years - 35 assistants
-Wasn’t ready to blame the capitalist system itself for creating poverty
-Took place in London - judged them based on the look of their house - inaccurate
-Different teams of investigators but Booth was constantly on it
-University educated team
-Divided the population into classes - acknowledge that they overlapped each other and that there were no sharp distinctions - believed that it was important to understand classes to understand causes of poverty
Booths findings?
-Class A - 0.9% of the population - bottom of social hierarchy - semi criminals - Booth believed that people were born into this class and rarely escaped
-Class B - 7.5% of the pop - causal, low paid workers, no security of employment - these people were (due to mental health, physical state or moral) incapable of bettering themselves
-Class C - irregular nature of work meant they was a constant struggle for survival
-Class D - low incomes but work was regular so could budget for survival
-Class E & F - 51.5% of population - regular employment - paid enough - lead conformable life
-Class G & H - lower and upper middle classes - 17.8% of the population
Were Booths findings reliable?
-Openly admitted he relied on observation only - Booth did not take into account income when defining poverty - subjective and unreliable
-Helen Bosanquet of the COS - objected social survey method by Booth - no underpinning philosophy - ‘poverty line’ was flawed - attacked statistical basis of Booth’s findings - claimed that it underestimated the income level of families - biased as she campaigned for the COS
-Looked for poverty when doing the study
-Classes were uneasy mix of the economic and moral
Poverty line
The level below which families have insufficient money to maintain a minimum acceptable standard of living - as standard of living rises, so does poverty line
Facts about Benjamin Seebohm Rowntree?
-devoted Quaker
-he believed that healthy, contented worked were also efficient workers, he believed in a democracy in the workplace a minimum wage, family allowances and old age pensions
Facts about Rowntrees investigation?
-conducted 3 surveys of poverty in York that provided a variety of statistical data which supported his findings
-aim was to find out both the numbers of people living in poverty and the nature of that poverty
-he hoped to build on Booth’s work and give more precision to the ‘poverty line’
-his first survey was in 1899 the second survey was completed in 1941 and the third in 1951
-he used one full-time investigator who carried out house-to-house visits as well as relying on information from clergymen, teachers and voluntary workers
What were Rowntrees findings?
-28% of the population in York were in obvious need and living in squalor
-the necessary minimum wage for a family to live in a state of physical efficiency was 21 shillings a week - this was were he drew the poverty line
-York lived below poverty line and Rowntree defined this as ‘primary poverty’
-the remaining 18% lived in a ‘secondary poverty’ these people were on the brink of ‘primary poverty’ surviving on the bare necessities of life with no savings
-uncovered what he called the ‘poverty cycle’:
1. childhood was a time of poverty, conditions improved when children earned a wage
2. couples, who had children, slipped below the poverty line and remained there until children began to earn
3. couples fell below the poverty line when they became old and couldnt work
How reliable were Rowntree’s findings?
-focuses on working classes in York, he defined these as families where the head of the household was a wage earner and no servants were employed
-around 11,560 households were visited and information 46,754 exactly 2/3 of the population
-looked at people’s houses to judge their level poverty - didn’t necessarily reflect eachother
-Helen Bosanquet of the COS - objected Rowntree
What were similarities between Booth and Rowntree?
-Don’t look at income
-Judged on observation
-Looked for poverty
-Same woman criticised surveys - Helen Bosanquet
-investigated the nature of poverty
-completed detailed investigation and collected statistical data
-relied on information from clergymen, teachers and voluntary workers
-highlighted a poverty line and said that around 30% were in poverty
-said the poor were poor because of no fault of their own
What were differences between Booth and Rowntree?
-Booths investigation took 17 years but Rowntrees took 2 years
-Booth worked in London and Rowntree in York
-Booth divided the pop into classes but Rowntree defined the poor into primary poverty and secondary poverty
Socialist
A political and economic ideology which promotes equal opportunity for all where there is increased government intervention and business is state owned - it prioritises society as a whole
Key facts about the Fabian Society?
-1884 - founded
-Socialists
-Gradual with non confrontational methods to push for change
-Key individuals include Emmeline Pankhurst and HG Wells
-Became present after the fellowship of the new life
Who were some key members of the Fabian society?
HG Wells - author
Emeline Pankhurst - suffragette
Beatrice Webb - wrote about industrial Britain and developing a research methodology
How did the Fabian Society protest for change?
-held meetings that published numerous pamphlets
-lobbied politicians on a wide range of topics from poor law reform to international alliances but all having at their core the need to advance national and international socialism
-Didn’t use violence as they preferred to utilise the power of local government and trade unions
What did the Fabians want to achieve?
-social justice
-equality
-more radical in their policies than the early 20th century reforms of the liberal govenrment would suggest
What did the Fabians do in 1906 and then in 1911?
-In 1906, the Fabians lobbied for the minimum wage to stop British companies trying to remain competitive by lowering wages
-1911, they created a universal health service that would enable Britain to be physically fit to defend their country
Did the Fabians support the Boer War? Why?
-they believed that imperialism would be the basis of British foreign policy as the pursuit of empire would enable Britain to become the centre of a worldwide empire not a collection of islands
-They believed that no small nations should have a place in the world of empires
-They advocated for a citizen army to form and replace he professional one which would be full of healthy men if the govenrmet supported their proposals for a universal health service and Factory Acts so that those in half time employment would be trained and educated
What political party did the Fabians help set up? When?
-1900 - sent delegates to the Labour Party Foundation Conference - led to the creation of the LRC (Labour representative committee) (other left wing societies were affiliates)
-26 LRC candidates elected in 1906, they set up a party in the commons (Labour Party) - showed the growing interest in the country in socialism
-Membership of Fabian society tripled numbering 2500 in 1908
-Student section created in 1912 with 500 members in 1914