Unit 3- Ethical Theories Flashcards

Case Sample- Proctor and Gamble- So-called 'Trade Secrets' and Invasion of privacy

1
Q

What are the 2 Branches of Ethical Theory and briefly explain them and give examples

A

Teleological Theory- Looks at the end result to determine morality. E.g. Utilitarianism

Deontological Theory- Looks at the action itself to determine morality. E.g. Kantian Ethics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Complete the phrase: In Teleological Ethics Morality is

A

Determined by the consequences of actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Teleological Ethics see morality as a

A

means to an end

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Utilitarianism

A

Theory is saying that morality should be based on achieving happiness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Principle of Utilitarianism

A

The greatest good for the greatest number

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Four Theses of Utilitarianism

A

Hedonism
Egoism
Consequentialism- right/wrong dependent of consequences
Universalism (related to Kant’s theory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Variations of Utilitarianism (2)

A

Act Utilitarianism- we are obligated to do the specific act that produces the greatest amount of happiness

Rule Utilitarianism- we should follow moral rules that, when acted upon, generally produce the greatest amount of happiness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How To Apply Utilitarian Principles

A
  1. Determine what alternative actions/policies are available
  2. For each alternative, estimate direct & indirect costs and benefits produced by the action for all persons
  3. For each action, [benefits - costs] to determine the net utility of each action.​
  4. Choose action with highest net utility- this is the ethical choice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Critics of Utilitarianism

A

Critics say not all values can be measured.​

Response: monetary or other commonsense measures can measure everything.​

Critics say utilitarianism fails with rights and justice.​

Response: rule-utilitarianism can deal with rights and justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cost Benefit Analysis

A

,,,,,,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Kantian Ethics

A

Right/Wrong is based on characteristics of action and not the end results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Universalizability:

A

must be possible to will the principle of your action for everybody without inconsistency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Universalizability Principle

A

If act is wrong for one, it is wrong for all

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Deontological Doctrine

A

Not use people as a “means to an end”
Individual rights not to be sacrificed
We have an obligation to do right regardless of utility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a Right?

A

An Individual’s entitlement to something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the kinds of rights

A

Legal: Entitlement that derives from legal system
Moral: Rights that all human beings everywhere possess by virtue of being human.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The three kinds of Moral Rights

A
  1. Negative rights- require others to leave us alone
  2. Positive Rights- requires others to act positively on our behalf
  3. Contractual or special rights- requires others to keep their agreements.
18
Q

General Info on Moral rights

A
  1. Can be violated even when “no one is hurt”- Breaching privacy example
  2. Provide people with autonomy and equality in the free pursuit of their interests
  3. Provide a basis for justifying one’s actions and for invoking the protection/aid of others
19
Q

Contractual Rights

A
  1. Created with specific agreements and conferred only on the parties involved.​
  2. Require publicly accepted rules on what constitutes agreements and what obligations agreements impose.​
  3. Underlie the special rights and duties imposed by accepting a position or role in an institution or organization.
20
Q

Kant and Moral Rights

A

Individuals generally must be left equally free to pursue their interests.​

Moral rights identify the specific interests individuals should be entitled to freely pursue. ​

An interest is important enough to raise to be a right if:​

a. we would not be willing to have everyone deprived of the freedom to pursue that interest​
b. the freedom to pursue that interest is needed to live as free and rational beings.​

21
Q

Kant’s Imperative

A

We must act only on reasons we would be willing to have anyone in a similar situation act on.​

Requires universalizability and reversibility.​

Side Note: Similar to questions: ​

“What if everyone did that?”​

“How would you like it if someone did that to you?”

22
Q

Kant’s Imperative (Second Version)

A
  1. Don’t use people as a “means to an end”

2. Humans have a certain dignity that differentiates them form mere objects

23
Q

Kantism in Business

A
  • Imperatives provide standards for making rules
  • Emphasises the absolute value and dignity of individuals
  • Stresses the importance on acting on the basis of right intentions
24
Q

Criticisms of Kant

A
  1. Both versions of the categorical imperative are unclear.​
  2. Rights can conflict and Kant’s theory cannot resolve such conflicts.​
  3. Kant’s theory implies moral judgments that are mistaken.​
25
Q

Justice

A

Deals with fairness

26
Q

Aristotle Categorization of Justice

A

Distributive- distribution of benefits/burdens
Compensative- compensating persons for wrongs done to them
Retributive- punishing wrong doers

27
Q

Aristotle’s Principle of Distributive Justice

A

The aim is equality (treating like cases alike), which can be expressed in an equation: A’s Share of P = A’s share of Q
B’s share of P B’s share of Q

Basically, pay/reward= work/any factor that requires a reward
The output should be fair based on input

28
Q

Justifying features in Aristotle’s Distributive Justice (Q)

A

Ability
Effort- energy exerted, sacrifices made
Accomplishment-
Need- having a lack of resources

29
Q

Rawl’s Egalitarian Theory Principles

A
  1. Each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive total system of basic liberties compatible with a similar system of liberty for all.
  2. Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both:
    a. to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged, and
    b. attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity.
30
Q

Libertarian Philosophy

A

Freedom from human constraint is necessarily good and all constraints imposed by others is necessarily evil except when needed to prevent the imposition of greater human constraints

31
Q

Robert Nozicks’ Libertarian Philosophy

A
  1. The only moral right is the negative right to freedom
  2. Right to freedom requires freedom of private property, freedom of contract, free markets, elimination of taxes to pay for social welfare programs.
32
Q

Difference between Rawls’s theory and Nozick’s theory ​

A
  1. Historical principles- considers the founding principles behind the distribution of justice
  2. Principles of Aristotle and Rawl are Patterned- Pattern is that a certain output is based on a certain input(Aristotle), and Equal reward for actions done (Rawl- Egalitarian Theory)
33
Q

Main Principles of Nozick’s Theory

A
  1. Just transfer- good is redistributed to you in a legal and ethical manner. E.g Inheritance, money transfers etc.
  2. Just original acquisition- you, who become the original owner of the good, acquire/purchase it in a legal and ethical manner.
  3. Just rectification- Injustices are corrected and goods redistributed in an ethical manner
34
Q

Virtue in Business- Aristotle Theory of Moral Virtue

A

Virtues are habits that enable a person to live according to reason by habitually choosing the mean between extremes in actions and emotions​.

35
Q

Criticisms of Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics Theory

A

A primary problem with this theory is that people have varying definitions of what traits are considered virtuous.

36
Q

Other theories on Virtue

A
  1. Aquinas​- virtues are habits that enable a person to live reasonably in this world and be united with God in the next​
  2. MacIntyre​- virtues are dispositions that enable a person to achieve the good at which human “practices” aim​
  3. Pincoffs​- virtues are dispositions we use when choosing between persons or potential future selves​
37
Q

Objections to Virtue Theories

A

“It is inconsistent with psychology which showed that behaviour is determined by the external situation, not moral character.​”

Response: moral character determines behaviour in a person’s familiar environment.​
Response: recent psychology shows behaviour is determined by one’s moral identity which includes one’s virtues and vices.

38
Q

Conscious​ Moral Decisions​

A
  • Made when wrong/right is an unclear, more complex situation
  • Is used in new, strange, or unusual situations for which the brain has no matching prototypes.​
  • Evaluate the reasonableness of our intuitions, cultural beliefs, and the norms stored in our prototypes.​
39
Q

Unconscious Moral Decisions​

A

​- made when wrong/ right is clear

  • Made by the brain’s “X-system” using stored prototypes to automatically and unconsciously identify what it perceives and what it should do.​
  • Comprise most of our moral decisions.
40
Q

Compare and Contrast Utilitarianism and Kantianism

A

Utilitarianism Kantism

Morality based on end result of happiness

Morality Based on intrinsic features of Behaviour

Morality is a means to an end

                  treat the agents as                                                                                                                    ends (the vital reason for achieving                                                                                        the end) not as mere means 

Greatest good for the greatest number

Individual rights should not be given up for the masses. Trade off’s forbidden

Pursuit of Happiness

Pursuit of universal morality and equity