UNIT 3 - Company Decision Making Flashcards
The board of directors of a company wants to call a general meeting on short notice. There are five shareholders with the following shareholdings:
- An accountant – 15,000 ordinary £1 shares
- A financial adviser – 4,000 ordinary £1 shares
- A doctor – 51,000 ordinary £1 shares
- A teacher – 20,000 ordinary £1 shares
- An estate agent – 10,000 ordinary £1 shares
Which of the following best describes which shareholders would need to agree in order for the general meeting to be held on short notice?
A) The doctor, because they hold a majority of the company’s shares.
B) Any three shareholders, because between them they would constitute a majority in number of the shareholders.
C) The accountant, the doctor and the teacher and either the financial adviser or the estate agent, because between them they constitute the required majority in number holding between them at least 90% of the shares.
D) The accountant, the financial adviser, the doctor and the estate agent, because between them they constitute the required majority in number holding the majority of the shares.
E) All five shareholders, because they would all be needed in order for the required majority in number holding between them at least 95% of the shares.
CORRECT ANSWER C - A majority in number of shareholders who between them hold 90% or more of the shares are required in order to agree to a general meeting being held on short notice (s 307(4)–(6) CA 2006). All of the other options are wrong either because they do
not constitute a majority in number of shareholders or because those shareholders do not between them hold 90% or more of the shares.
A private company has the Model Articles of Association with no amendments. It has six directors. A board meeting is scheduled for next week and the chair intends to propose
a resolution to appoint a new director. Four directors (the chair, the finance director, the operations director and the HR director, referred to collectively as the ‘Directors in Favour’) are in favour of the appointment and the other two directors (the IT director and the director of planning) are against it.
Assume that at the board meeting everyone who attends will vote as indicated above and that none of the directors have a personal interest in the matter.
Which of the following best explains who should attend the board meeting in order for the resolution to be passed?
A) As long as any two directors attend the board meeting, the resolution will be passed.
B) As long as the chair and any one other director attend the board meeting, the resolution will be passed.
C) As long as the chair attends the board meeting, the resolution will be passed.
D) As long as any two of the Directors in Favour attend the board meeting, the resolution will be passed.
E) As long as the chair and one of the other Directors in Favour attend the board meeting, the resolution will be passed.
CORRECT ANSWER E - In order for the resolution to be passed, the board meeting must be quorate and a simple majority of directors must vote in favour of the resolution (MA 7). The quorum for a board meeting is two (MA 11), so two of those directors in favour must attend, to ensure there is a quorum. If they did not, the directors who are against the resolution could fail to turn up and the meeting would not be quorate. The chair of the board has
a casting vote (MA 13), so at the board meeting, either three directors or the chair and another director must vote in favour to ensure that there is a majority in favour of the resolution. Option E is the only combination which makes sure the quorum is met and that enough directors are present to outvote the IT director and the director of planning.
A company has an entire issued share capital of 1,000 shares of £1 each. The original shareholders were a nurse, who had 950 shares and a dentist, who had 50 shares. Last week the nurse sold 500 of his shares to the dentist, and the rest of his shares to new shareholders: 200 shares to a local investor and 250 shares to a surgeon.
Which of the following best describes the amendments the company must make to the register of People with Significant Control (‘PSC register’) as a consequence of the sale described above?
A) The company will need to add the local investor and the surgeon to the PSC register.
B) The company will need to add the local investor and the surgeon to the PSC register and remove the nurse.
C) The company will need to add the dentist to the PSC register and remove the nurse.
D) The company will need to add the dentist to the PSC register.
E) The company will need to add the dentist, the local investor and the surgeon to the PSC register and remove the nurse
CORRECT ANSWER C - Only those with over 25% of the company’s shares need to be on the PSC register. Before the transfers, the nurse had 95% of the company’s shares and the dentist had 5% of the company’s shares, so the nurse will have been on the PSC register and the dentist will not have been on it. Following the transfers, the shareholdings changed to the dentist (55%), the local investor (20%) and the surgeon (25%). The local investor does not have enough shares to appear on the register and neither does the surgeon, because they do not have over 25%. The dentist has enough shares to appear and must be added. The nurse should be removed because he has ceased to be a shareholder.
In a company with model articles, which of the following decisions is made by only the directors of a company?
a) Change of company name.
b) Change of accounting reference date.
c) Change of articles.
d) Enter into a substantial property transaction.
e) Remove a director from office.
CORRECT ANSWER B - The directors are able to change the accounting reference date according to s392 CA06. The other decisions are reserved for the shareholders or require shareholder approval.
A private limited company with model articles sends out a written resolution to its members on 1 January.
What will be the lapse date for the written resolution?
A) 1 January.
B) 14 January.
C) 21 January.
D) 28 January.
E) 29 January.
CORRECT ANSWER D - The lapse date will be 28 days after the circulation date and the timer period begins on the circulation date (s297). Almost all time periods in the Companies Act start to run the day after they are initiated, however the 28 days for the lapse date of written resolutions starts to run on the same day as the circulation date. Votes received on 28 January will still be valid but as it is the last day it is referred to as the lapse date.
A private limited company with model articles wishes to pass an ordinary resolution by way of written resolution to appoint a director.
What percentage of the votes of the eligible members will be required to pass the written resolution?
A) More than 50%
B) 51%
C) 75%
D) More than 75%
E) 100%
CORRECT ANSWER A - The percentage required to pass a written resolution does not differ from the percentage required to pass a resolution at a general meeting. Here, an ordinary resolution needs to have more than 50% of the votes in favour to pass.
Who would vote on a special resolution to be passed by way of written resolution?
A) The directors.
B) The shareholders.
C) Both the directors and the shareholders.
D) The chairman.
E) The creditors of the company.
CORRECT ANSWER B - Special resolutions are voted on by the shareholders and this does not change just because it is a written resolution.
Shareholders in a private limited company with model articles vote on an ordinary resolution by way of written resolution.
When calculating if the vote has passed, how would the percentages be calculated?
A) The number of positive votes compared to the number of negative votes.
B) The number of positive votes as a percentage of the shares present and voting.
C) The number of positive votes as a percentage of the total shares of the eligible members.
D) The number of positive votes as a percentage of the shares which vote (ignoring shares which abstain).
E) The number of negative votes as a percentage of 100.
CORRECT ANSWER C - Written resolutions operate slightly differently from general meetings when calculating percentages. In order to pass a written resolution, the votes must match the required percentage against all the shares held by eligible members of the company. It is irrelevant if a shareholder abstains, does not return an answer or votes in the negative. A company with 100 shares held by eligible members must have at least 51 shares that vote for the resolution in order for it to pass an ordinary resolution.
In a general meeting the required percentage is of those present and voting, which can lead to a different result.
What is the minimum time period between the directors circulating a written resolution and the resolution passing?
A) There is no minimum time period.
B) 24 hours.
C) 14 days.
D) 14 clear days.
E) 21 days.
CORRECT ANSWER A - There is no minimum time period. As soon as the written resolution is signed by the requisite percentage of eligible members and returned to the company it is validly passed (s296 CA06).
Who has the power to change the articles of the company?
A) The directors.
B) The shareholders.
C) Either the directors or the shareholders.
D) Both the directors and the shareholders must be in agreement.
E) The shareholders must approve it and the directors must execute it.
CORRECT ANSWER B - The shareholders have the power to amend the articles of the company (s21 CA06).
A private limited company has model articles with one amendment; MA4 has been disapplied. It has one director and one shareholder (who are not the same person). The shareholder and the director disagree on the best strategy for the company.
Will the shareholder or the director usually decide on the company’s strategy?
A) The shareholder.
B) The director.
C) They must both agree.
D) The shareholder, but the director can remove the shareholder and/or appoint new shareholders.
E) The director, but the shareholder can remove the director and/or appoint new directors.
CORRECT ANSWER E - Model article 3 provides that the directors will run the company from day to day. Shareholders are able to remove directors and/or appoint new ones who are more likely to implement the decisions that that the shareholders want.
(Model article 4 provides for the shareholders to direct the directors to take a specified action if the shareholders pass a special resolution. This is very unusual and it is impractical for the shareholders to rely on this power as it only applies to one action. Additionally, directors usually circulate the resolution, and in this case, presumably the shareholder would have to requisition the circulation of the resolution themselves which is more cumbersome.)
A private limited company has model articles. The shareholders wish to vote at a general meeting to approve the long-term service contract (5 years) of one of the directors. The shareholders have not requisitioned a meeting.
What has to happen before the general meeting?
A) Consent to short notice must be agreed by a majority in number of the shareholders and at least 90% of the voting shares.
B) Update the PSC register.
C) General meeting minutes must be drafted.
D) A board meeting to call the general meeting.
E) Filing at Companies House.
CORRECT ANSWER D - The directors must call the general meeting at a board meeting before the general meeting can take place.
In the usual company decision making process, what is the correct order of events?
A) General meeting notice, general meeting, board meeting notice, board meeting, general meeting.
B) General meeting notice, general meeting, board meeting notice, board meeting.
C) Board meeting notice, board meeting, general meeting notice, general meeting, board meeting.
D) Board meeting notice, general meeting notice, general meeting, board meeting.
E) General meeting, board meeting, general meeting notice, board meeting notice.
CORRECT ANSWER C - Notice is given of the board meeting, then the board meeting is held. At that board meeting the notice of the general meeting will be circulated. Then the general meeting will be held. Often decisions require a reconvened or a second board meeting in order to implement the decisions/approvals at the general meeting.
Option D is in the correct order but does not answer the question as well as option C. as it leaves out a key stage.
A company has five shareholders, each with 20% of the voting shares. They are voting on an ordinary resolution to approve the purchase of some land from one of the shareholders. Three of the shareholders are for the resolution and two are against it. The shareholder who is selling the land is for the resolution. All the shareholders are present at the general meeting.
Will the ordinary resolution at a general meeting pass?
A. Yes, because an ordinary resolution requires more than 50% and the vote will be three to two on a show of hands and 60% to 40% on a poll.
B. Yes, because even though the selling shareholder is disqualified from voting, the vote will be tied and therefore will pass.
C. No because an ordinary resolution requires at least 75% of the vote to pass and only 60% of the shareholders are in favour (three to two on a show of hands and 60% to 40% on a poll).
D. No, because the interested shareholder will be disqualified from counting in the quorum and therefore if they are present at the meeting it will be inquorate.
E. No, because even though the selling shareholder is disqualified from voting, the vote will be tied and therefore will not pass.
CORRECT ANSWER A - An ordinary resolution will require more than 50% to pass. The vote will be won on a show of hands or a poll vote. The shareholder is not disqualified from voting or counting in the quorum. The rules for shareholders are not the same as the rules for directors - MA14 does not apply to shareholders. Because shareholders own the company, they have almost no restrictions on when their vote counts. The two notable exceptions to this are when they are voting on buying back their own shares or ratifying a breach of their own duty.
A private limited company with model articles has three shareholders. Shareholder 1 has 95% of the shares, shareholder 2 has 3% of the shares and shareholder 3 has 2% of the shares. Shareholder 1 is in favour of the proposed shareholder resolution and shareholders 2 and 3 are against the resolution and they will fight it in any way they can. The directors wish to have the shareholders pass a special resolution as fast as possible.
What is the fastest option for the company to pass a special shareholder resolution in this case?
A. A general meeting held on normal notice.
B. A general meeting held on short notice.
C. The shareholder requisitions a general meeting.
D. A written resolution of the shareholders.
E. A written resolution of the directors.
CORRECT ANSWER D - A written resolution of the shareholders will be passed as soon as the requisite majority are in favour. Here at least 75% of the eligible members ( as defined in s 289 Companies Act 2006) must be in favour and shareholder 1 has 95%. So as soon as shareholder 1 signs and returns the written resolution it will pass, regardless of what the other two shareholders do. There are no minimum time limits for a written resolution. It could be passed immediately after the board meeting.
Option A is not as fast as a written resolution because they would have to wait a minimum of 14 clear days. Option B seems to be just as fast as a written resolution, but it suffers from the problem that the requirements for short notice are at least 90% of the shares AND a majority in number of shareholders must be in favour. Here 95% of the shares will vote in favour but two out of three will vote against short notice.
Option C is unnecessary as the directors are in favour of the resolution. It also does not improve on the problems with a delay in calling a general meeting.
Option E would pass a resolution of the directors, but we need a resolution of the shareholders. Directors can use a written resolution procedure, but it is not very common as every director must vote in favour in order for it to pass. This extra requirement, along with the fact that there minimum notice requirements for board meetings means that a directors written resolution is not as useful a procedure as the shareholder written resolution.