Unit 3: Area of Study 2 - The Victorian Civil Justice System Flashcards
Parties in a Civil Dispute
- Plaintiff
- Defendant
Plaintiff
Is the party who makes a legal claim against another person because they believe their rights have been infringed
Defendant
Is the party who has been alleged of infringing the rights of the plaintiff
The party who Initiates a Civil Claim
The Plaintiff
Types of Civil Disputes (List 2)
- Defamation
- Negligence
- Family Law
- Breach of Contract
Purpose of Civil Law
Is to restore the plaintiff (as far as possible) to the position they were in before the civil wrong occurred
Institutions that Resolve Civil Disputes (List 2)
- Magistrates Court
- County Court
- Supreme Court
- Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT)
- Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV)
The Party who holds the Burden of Proof
The Plaintiff
The Standard of Proof in a Civil Dispute is…
On the ‘Balance of Probabilities’
What is the ‘Balance of Probabilities’
Is the standard of proof in a civil case and it means that the Plaintiff needs to establish that their version of event/s are more than likely to have occurred that the Defendant’s version of the event/s
Methods to Resolve a Civil Dispute
- Judicial Determination (Courts)
- Mediation
- Conciliation
- Arbitration
Principle of Justice: Fairness
Refers to being treated without favouritism nor discrimination and being able to have a fair and unbiased hearing
How Fairness is Upheld in the Civil Justice System
Both parties should know the case against them and have the opportunity to present their case infront of a Judge and Jury (if there is one)
Principles of Justice: Equality
Is how no person or group should be treated favourably or unfavourably because of an attribute or characteristic
How Equality is Upheld in the Civil Justice System
The availability of legal representation to those with little money
Principles of Justice: Access
Is how people should be able to understand their legal rights and be able to pursue their claims
How Access is upheld in the Civil Justice System
The availability of alternative Dispute Resolution Bodies
The Burden of Proof does not rest with the Prosecution when…
The Defendant counterclaims
Counterclaim
A separate claim made by the Defendant in response to the Plaintiff’s claim
Representative Proceedings
Is when a group of 7 or more people who all have the same claim against the same party file their claim to a Court
Criteria for a Representative Proceeding
- 7 or more people need to be involved
- Their claim needs to arise from the same or related facts or circumstances
- The same legal issue/s need to be decided for all parties
When Representative Proceedings are Appropriate (List 2)
- Workplace Incidents: A spill affects a number of workers
- Medical Malpractice: A doctor operates without a licence on multiple patients
- Large Number of Claims for a Small Loss: A bank overcharges customers
Strengths of Representative Proceedings (List 2)
- Group members can share costs
- More efficient for the Courts
- Provides access by allowing people to pursue a civil action that they otherwise couldn’t afford
- May be funded by a Litigation Funder; A third party who pays for some or all costs associated woth the claim in return for a share of the proceed
Weaknesses of Representative Proceedings (List 2)
- Seen to be a risk for businesses
- Costs involved can be significant
- If there is a Litigation Funder, a significant percentage of any damages awarded or settlement amount will be paid out to the Litigation Funder before group members recieve any funds
Factors to Consider when Initiating a Civil Claim
- Costs
- Limitation of Actions
- Enforcement Issues
- Negotiation Options
- Scope of Liability
Factors to Consider when Initiating a Civil Claim: Costs
- The more complex the case, the more expensive the Lawyers are
- Even if the case is won, all legal expenses may not be reimbursed
Considerations for a Plaintiff Regarding Costs (List 2)
- How much will the dispute cost to resolve?
- Does the Defendant have the required money?
- Do I have the required money?
- Am I eligible for Legal Aid?
- What are the risks?
Availability of Legal Aid for Civil Disputes
Victorian Legal Aid (VLA) is largely directed towards criminal and family matters and is not available for matters such as business disputes and wills
Adverse Costs Order
Is the party that loses the dispute may need to pay some, or if not all of the costs for the other side
Factors to Consider when Initiating a Civil Claim: Limitation of Actions
Refers to the time limits by which the Proceedings must commence
Purposes of Limitation of Actions (List 2)
- To ensure that evidence isn’t lost
- To ensure witnesses don’t forget what happened
- To ensure that disputes can be resolved in a timely manner
Examples of Limitation of Actions (List 2)
- Defamation Claim: Has to be heard within 1 year
- Breach of Contract: Has to be heard within 6 years
- Action to Recover Land Claim: Has to be heard within 15 years
- Under Tort Law Claim: Has to be heard within 6 years
Factors to Consider when Initiating a Civil Claim: Scope of Liability
Refers to the liability of an individual, and is there more than one individual
Possible Defendants in a Civil Case
- Employers
- Insurers
- General persons involved in the wrongdoing
Vicarious Liability
Is where an Employer is liable for te actions of their Employee
Possible Defendants in a Civil Case: Employers
- Employers may become liable of the actions of the Employees under the principle of ‘Vicarious Liability’
- The Plaintiff needs to prove that he Employee committed the wrongdoing whilst they were employed
Possible Defendants in a Civil Case: Insurers
- An insurance policy is an arrangement where an Insurer agrees to compensate the insured for some kind of loss
- Some types of insurance are:
- Workers’ Compensation
- Public Liability Insurance
Possible Defendants in a Civil Case: General Persons Involved in the Wrongdoing
A person may be involved in the wrongdoing if (List 2):
- They helped in the wrongdoing
- Induced or encouraged the wrongdoing
- Were in any way a party to the wrongdoing
- Conspired with others to cause the wrongdoing
Extent of the Defendant’s Liability
- The Defendant may try to claim ‘contributory negligence’ which means that they claim that the Plaintiff contributed to their own injury or loss
- The Defendant may also argue that it was someone else’s fault
Factors to Consider when Initiating a Civil Claim: Enforcement Issues
Refers to if there are any issues with enforcing the Remedy
Examples of Enforcement Issues (List 2)
- The Defendant is a company and have minimal assets
- The Defendant may be in Jail
- The Defendant may be bankrupt or does not have enough money to compensate the Plaintiff
- The Plaintiff may not even know who the Defendant/s are
Factors to Consider when Initiating a Civil Claim: Negotiation Options
- The parties may try to avoid Court and Lawyers all together and sort the matter out themselves
- They could negotiate with Lawyers to agree without going to Court
- They may be able to resolve the dispute through Mediation, Conciliation or Arbitration
When Negotiation is Appropriate (List 1)
- Both parties agree to negotiate
- They want to maintain a working relationship
- They want to reduce costs, time and stress
When Negotiation is not Appropriate (List 1)
- One or both of the parties won’t negotiate
- Attempts to negotiate have already failed
- There have been violence between the parties or an imbalance of power
Strengths of Negotiations (List 2)
- The costs time and stress involved in a formal Civil Trial may be avoided
- The parties have control over the outcome, opposed to it being decided by a third-party
- The parties may be more prepared to accept an outcome that they have helped achieve, as opposed to one being imposed by a Court or Tribunal
Weaknesses of Negotiations (List 2)
- No party can be forced to negotiate
- Some issues may not be negotiable
- The absence of a neutral third-party may encourage one party to take advantage of the other
- Negotiation may be used as a stalling tactic to prevent the other party from using Mediation, Conciliation or Arbitration
Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV)
Is a complaints body which is part of the Victorian Government’s Department of Justice and Regulation
Purposes of Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) (List 2)
- To advice the Victorian Government on Consumer laws
- To provide information and guidance for the public about consumer laws
- Enforces compliance with consumer laws
- Provides Consumer and Traders, Landlords and Tenants with a dispute resolution process and only accepts complaints from Consumers and Tenants
Dispute Resolution Method used at Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV)
Conciliation
Jurisdiction of Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) (List 2)
- The supply of goods and services
- Residential tenancies
- Retirement villages
- Owners’ corporations
When Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) is Appropriate (List 2)
- The dispute is within their Jurisdiction
- The parties have tried to negotiate themselves
- Both parties are willing to attend and participate
When Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) is not Appropriate (List 2)
- The dispute is out of their Jurisdiction
- The matter has already been resolved by the Courts
- The parties have not tried to negotiate amongst themselves
- One party is unwilling to participate
Strengths of Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) (List 1)
- The Conciliation process is free, so it is accessible to all Victorians
- Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) aims to resolve disputes in an informal and timely manner
- Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) will ensure that the process is fair and that both parties have the opportunity to present their case
Weaknesses of Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) (List 2)
- Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) cannot force the parties to participate in Conciliation
- Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) lack enforcement powers and any agreement made via Conciliation can only be enforced by the Courts
- Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) is generally not appropriate in solving large or complex disputes
- Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) can only intervene in certain disputes
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT)
VCAT is a Tribunal that solves a range of Civil and Administrative disputes in Victoria
Purpose of VCAT
To provide a lost-cost, accessible and efficient service to resolve Civil Disputes
Methods of Dispute Resolution at VCAT
- Mediation
- Compulsory Conferences
- Final Hearing
Methods of Dispute Resolution at VCAT: Mediation
- Most disputes at VCAT will go to Mediation prior to a Final Hearing
- If a Mediation session does not work in solving the dispute, VCAT also offers a Short Mediation and Hearing Process for small Civil Claims. This is heard on the same day as the Mediation session at a Hearing my a different VCAT member
Methods of Dispute Resolution at VCAT: Compulsory Conferences
- Are pre-hearing meetings where a VCAT member is present
- The parties try to resolve their dispute via Conciliation
- The VCAT member may suggest potential solutions as well as advise what the likely outcome of the cause will be if it proceeds to a hearing
Methods of Dispute Resolution at VCAT: Final Hearing
VCAT may make a wide range of orders to resolve a dispute such as ordering a party to pay money or ordering an Injunction to be imposed. These orders are Legally Binding and can be enforced with the assistance of the Courts
Jurisdiction of VCAT
VCAT can hear claims about: (List 2)
- Disputes between Landlords and Tenants
- Discrimination
- Sexual Harassment
- Lawyer Conduct
- Domestic Building Works
When VCAT is Appropriate (List 2)
- The dispute is within their Jurisdiction
- The parties have tried to negotiate themselves
- Both parties are happy to only be able to Appeal on the Point of Law
- The parties prefer an informal method of dispute resolution
When VCAT is not Appropriate (List 2)
- The dispute is not in VCAT’s Jurisdiction
- The parties are willing to negotiate
- The parties want greater ability to appeal
- The parties want legal representation
- The claim is for a large sum of money