Unit 3: Area of Study 2 - Consequences of the Russian Revolution Flashcards
Model to use when Responding to Area of Study 2
- Challenge
- Response
- Outcome
Years that Resulted from the Revolution
1917-1927
Dates of Issing New Decrees
October 1917 - January 1918
Challenge of Issuing New Decrees
The Bolsheviks needed to expand their support base, as they only had support in the big industrial cities and needed to consolidate the power of Sovnarkom
Response to Issuing New Decrees
Every day from when they seized power until January 1918, Sovnarkom issued 116 new decrees, which was about nearly 2 per day. The Declaration on the Rights of the People’s of Russia (November 2, 1917) recognised the right of non-Russian ethnic minorities to self-determination, which leads to the recognition of Finland declaring their independence
Examples of New Decrees (List 2)
- The Decree on Peace (October 26, 1917) called for immediate peace negotiations to end WWI
- The Decree on Land (October 26, 1917) authorised the redistribution of Gentry, church and crown land by local Peasant Soviets
- The Decree on the Hours of Work (October 29, 1917) introduced the 8-hour work day, guaranteed paid overtime work and other general working rights
Outcome of Issuing New Decrees
Lenin and the Bolsheviks has projected the image of that they were trying to help the lower classes but secured limited support from the broad mass of poor Peasants and workers
Date of the Formation of the Cheka
December 7, 1917
Challenge of Felix Dzershinsky and the Cheka
Lenin was setting up a coercive apparatus, a way of eliminating Counter-Revolutionaries or threats from trators to the Revolution
Response to Felix Dzershinsky and the Cheka
Just 6 weeks after his Government was established, he created the Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage (The Cheka). At the start, it was very small and by January 1918, it only had 120 agents. It was led by Felix Dzershinsky who instructed Cheka agents to see themselves as “soldiers” on the ‘internal front’ of the Civil War with the Bourgeoisie. To start with, the Cheka started out with maintaining surveillance of suspected Counter-Revolutionary groups, which included rival Socialist Parties such as the SR’s. They would torture people to extract confessions and would spy on people
Outcome of Felix Dzershinsky and the Cheka
The Cheka gradually developed into a secret police force that modelled the Tsarist Okhrana. If helped transform the Soviet Government into a single-party dictatorship by eliminating dissent
Challenge of State Capitalism
Lenin set an economic policy by December 1917 as he believed that Russia’s economy was not advanced enough to make the transition to Socialism and Communism
Responses to State Capitalism
- Lenin originally affirmed that free trade and private enterprise would remain legal in Russia, but they would be regulated so that the evils of Capitalism would be minimised and that Capitalism would serve the needs of the dictatorship of the Proletariat. This meant that he adopted a contradictory approach as he wanted to continue Capitalist development but he stood for the rights of the workers. This was called State Capitalism
- To placate factory workers, in November 1917, Lenin issued the Decree of Workers’ Control, which stated that every factory would be run democratically with an elected factory committee setting rules such as the length of the work day and the pay rates
Outcomes of State Capitalism
- Factory Committees voted to give factory workers huge pay increases, to get rid of unpopular rules and to not do as much work. This led to the Russian economy falling rapidly as the productivity in the factories decreasing
- State Capitalism therefore proved to be insufficient to meet the demands of the Sovnarkom and the Red Army during the Russian Civil War. The Soviet Government needed to prioritise which industries would receive scarce fuel supplies. State Capitalism was short-lived and replaced by War Communism in 1918
Date of the Dismissal of the Constituent Assembly
January 5, 1918
Challenge of the Dismissal of the Constituent Assembly
The Bolsheviks were forced to permit elections for the Constituent Assembly in November 1917
Responses to the Dismissal of the Constituent Assembly
Lenin does not want to appear as a dictator, so he lets the elections go ahead in November 1917. The Bolsheviks win 24% of the votes. However, the SR’s won 47% of the votes. Lenin refused to accept the authority of a SR dominated authority. He said that it would be a “Bourgeois parliament” and it would be a “retrograde step” from a Soviet democracy. He refused to give up control
- The Constituent Assembly convened on January 5, 1918. After it refused to accept the authority of the Soviet Government, Lenin used 5,000 troops to dismiss the Constituent Assembly
Outcome of the Dismissal of the Constituent Assembly
Lenin has prevented any public challenge to Bolshevik authority. However, he has done so in a way that shows that he is building a one-party dictatorship, which alienates the other political parties in Russia who to start off with are willing to give Lenin the benefit of the doubt but increasingly during 1918 start to mount attacks on the Bolsheviks, establishing rival Governments
Date of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
March 3, 1918
Challenge of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
Lenin needed to fulfil his promise to withdraw from WWI
Response to the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
Peace negotiations to withdraw from the war began in December 1917. The German Government however offered fairly harsh terms in exchange for peace. Essentially, they wanted the Soviet Government to pay massive indemnities to make up for all of the damage that Germany has suffered and the Germans will annex (take over and build on) all the territory that they have captured. These negotiations went on for months and Germany impatiently resumed an offensive in February 1918 and captured Ukraine in 5 days. Fearing that the Germans would advance and capture Petrograd, Lenin argued “It is a question of signing the peace terms now or signing the death sentence of the Soviet Government three weeks later.” On March 3, 1918, the representatives of Sovnarkom signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with the Central Powers, making peace with Germany, officially ending its involvement in WWI
Outcomes of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
- A positive outcome of this is that by signing the Treaty, it saved the Soviet Government from being overthrown and fulfils Lenin’s promise of peace, which helps increase the legitimacy of the Soviet Government, which makes all the workers, Peasants and soldiers increasingly see the Soviet Government as a force for good
- A negative outcome of signing the Treaty is that it has had a profoundly bad impact on the Russian economy. The Germans turned Ukraine into a ‘puppet state’, which meant that Germany had control over its actions. Ukraine previously supplied Russia with 40% of its food and produced 40% of its coal output. Without food and coal imports, the Russian economy was about to collapse. This is why Lenin had to implement the extreme policies of War Communism