unit 3 aos1 victorian criminal justice system part A Flashcards
criminal justice system
a set of processes and institutions used to investigate and determine criminal cases
2 purposes of the criminal justice system
decide whether an accused is guilty of an offence and impose a sanction in cases where an accused has been found or pleaded guilty to an offence.
3 stages of a criminal case
investigation, determination, corrections
sanction
a penalty (fine or prison sentence) imposed by a court on a person guilty of a criminal offence
australian constitution
a set of rules and principles that guide the way Australia is governed. The australian constitution is set out in Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
commonwealth offences
crimes that break a law passed by the commonwealth parliament
statute
a law made by parliament; a bill that has passed through parliament and has recieved royal assent
each state and territory has its own criminal justice system and laws that establish: (3)
what is considered a crime, the processes used to decide if someone is guilty, the maximum penalty that can be imposed for each specific crime.
3 courts of victoria in hierarchy order
the magistrate’s, the county court, the supreme court
2 parties in a criminal case
prosecution and accused
the prosecution
used to describe the party that presents the evidence in court on behalf of the state against a person accused of commiting the crime.
a prosecutor
the representative of the prosecution who is responsible for conducting the criminal case and appearing in court
who prosecutes serious crimes in the county and supreme courts (in victoria)
the office of public prosecutions (OPP) and the director of public prosecutions (DPP)
director of public prosecutions (DPP)
the independent officer responsible for commencing, preparing and conducting prosecutions of indictable offences on behalf of the State of Victoria. OPP may do this on behalf of the DPP
jury
an independent group of people chosen at random to determine questions of fact in a trial and reach a decision (i.e. a verdict)
summary offence (+3 examples)
a minor offence generally heard in the magistrates’ court. may include drink driving, disorderly conduct and minor assaults.
indictable offences
a serious offence generally heard before a judge and jury in the county court or supreme court of victoria
what occurs when an accused pleads not guilty for an indictable offence?
committal proceedings
committal proceedings
the pre trial hearings and processes held in the magistrate’s court for indictable offences.
what is the purpose of committal proceedings?
the purposes of committal proceedings is to ensure that it is a case with adequate evidence before going to court or even finding out whether the accused will plead guilty or not guilty.
indictable offences heard summarily
a serious offence that is dealt with as a summary offence if the court and the accused agree. this is determined by statute (Criminal Procedure Act 2009).
what are 3 reasons as to why someone would prefer to have their indictable offence heard summarily?
quicker, cheaper and the maximum penalty that can be handed down is less than if it were heard as an indictable offence.
burden of proof
the obligation (i.e. responsibility) of a party to prove a case. The burden of proof usually rests with the party who initiates the action (i.e. the plaintiff in a civil dispute and the prosecution in a criminal case)
standard of proof
the degree or extent to which a case must be proved in court. In a criminal case, the prosecution must prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.
beyond reasonable doubt
the standard of proof in criminal cases. This requires the prosecution to prove there is no reasonable doubt that the accused committed the offence
presumption of innocence
the right of a person accused of a crime to be presumed not guilty unless proven otherwise.
what is the presumption of innocence protected by?
the charter of human rights and responsibilities act 2006.
common law
law made by judges through decisions made in cases . Also known as case law or judgemade law (as opposed to statute law)
5 ways the presumption of innocence is upheld
an accused has the right to silence, police must reasonably believe a person has committed a crime before they can be arrested, for indictable offences the prosecution must prove there is enough evidence to support a conviction before going to trial, a person’s prior convictions cannot be revealed until sentencing, an offender has the right to appeal a wronful conviction.
rule of law
the principle that everyone in society is bound by law and must obey the law
what are the 3 rights of an accused?
the right to be tried without unreasonable delay, the right to silence, the right to be tried by a jury
the right to be tried without unreasonable delay
The accused has the right to have their charges heard in a timely manner. Delays should only occur if they are considered reasonable without discrimination
why is the right to be tried without unreasonable delay important? (3)
They can make it more difficult to conduct a trial because memories fade over time. Delays = costs.
Interferes with concept of innocent until proven guilty.
how is the right to be tried without unreasonable delay protected?
Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) – sections 21 and 25
the right to a trial by jury
A trial by jury is where a person’s peers within the community decide the outcome of the case – in a criminal case, whether or not the accused is guilty
how is the right to be trialled by a jury protected? (2)
Juries Act 2000 (Vic) for state indictable offences and Section 80 of the Australian Constitution for Commonwealth indictable offences
the right to silence
the protection given to an accused person to not have to say anything. The right to silence can include the refusal to answer questions. There can be no negative consequences for an accused person who invokes this right. This includes any assumptions about guilt based on the refusal to speak.
how is the right to silence protected?
Both common law and statute law protect the right to silence, and a judge should direct the jury on this topic.