unit 3 aos 1 part b legal studies Flashcards
what are the roles of the magistrate or judge
- act impartially when making decesions
- manage hearing or trial
- magistrate: decides verdict
- sentencing an offender
acting impartially when making decesions
- unbiased when making decisions
- must be no apprehension that they are unbias
- if there is any, they should be removed from case
not withstanding: sometimes bias can happen which means fairness not achieved
manage hearing or trial
- ensuring correct court procedures to both parties
- controlling events/ witness
- whether evidence is permissible
- adjust trial process based on disparity or disadvantage
notwithstanding this, often comments are made towards one sides counsel meaning equality is not achieved
magistrate decides the verdict
- deciding whether the accused is guilty based on facts and law beyond reasonable doubt
one limitation is there is no public participation hindering access
sentence an offender
- hear from both parties and hear from victims
- allow the parties to submit appropriate submission about offending and the sentencing (including victims through victim impact statements)
notwithstanding this there can be risks that they have subconscious biases hindering fairness
roles of the jury
- be objective in delivering verdict
- listen to and remember evidence
- understanding judges directions and summing up
be objective in delivering verdict
- unbiased and bring an open mind
- putting aside prejudice
notwithstanding this jury members may have unconscious biases or prejudices hindering fairness
listen to and remember evidence
- makes sense of all evidence
- must not undertake any investigation research or inquiries prior or during the case
one limitation is that jurors may struggle to recall all the evidence accurately, especially in long or complex trials hindering fairness
understanding judges directions + summing up
- when instructions are given to jury about points of law
- asking for explanations on things they don’t understanding
notwithstanding this jury trials may result in further delays as rules, evidence and processes need to be explained to the jury hindering access
role of the parties
- prosecution has to disclose information about accused
- participate in hearing and trial
- make submissions about sentencing
prosecution disclosing information about accused
- disclose evidence, name, statements and relavent conviction about prosecutions witness
notwithstanding this sometimes police wait to see what the defence requests rather than providing disclosure upfront/proactively as required which hinders fairness
participate in hearing and trial
- present opening address
- cross examining witness
- present closing address
one limitation is the access for self-represented accused, as they may not be able to fully understand and participate in the hearing or trial hindering access
make submission about sentencing
- plea hearing at which the parties can make submissions about sentencing, the offender is also entitled to make submissions about sentencing.
- accused will try to obtain the least possible sentence available
notwithstanding this based on objective legal principles rather than the persuasive ability or strategic arguments of either party hindering fairness
why is a legal practitioner needed for an accused
- to understand complex legal process/ terminology which most accused are unfamiliar with
- to give an accused to opportunity to test the prosecutions evidence
- to ensure closed processes (plea.negs) are done fairly and without pressure to plead guilty
- for accused who may find it difficult to objectively asses the strength of their case and risk of going to trial
- magistrate or judge can assist self represented accused but cannot extend to advocating or giving specific advice