Unit 3 Flashcards

1
Q

what is the meaning of democracy

A

the voice of the people, everyone has a say in the outcome of a vote/election.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is a representative government

A

a government that you choose to represent you by voting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the rule of law, and three aspects of it

A

system used by the Australian government

aspects include
- the law is accessible and known
- presumption of innocence
- independent and impartial jury
- laws are made open and transparent
- fair and prompt trials
- the separation of powers (legislature, judiciary and executive)
- people can only be punished in accordance with the law
- the law is open to criticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is a responsible government

A

a government that does the right tine and doesn’t offer empty promises for more votes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how is a responsible government different to a Populus goverment

A

Populus government do what people want, whereas responsible governments do what is right over what people want

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

describe the Australian Constitution

A

its creation allowed Australia to become a political and legal entity on the 1st January 1901. It is the founding and most important law in Australia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does S51 if the constitution say

A

refers to the exclusive powers (those held by the federal government)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the definition of residual powers

A

the powers that are not mentioned under S51 of the constitution, those possessed by the state rather than federal government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are some examples of residual powers

A
  • education
  • health
  • roads
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what does S109 of the constitution mean

A

it answers for when there is an argument between the federal and state governments regarding a legal issue, and how the federal government wins over the state governments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is S128

A

section of the constitution that manages changes to the constitution. stipulates that there must be a double majority, a majority of votes from the people and majority of votes from the states of Australia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the separation of powers

A

the separation of the powers of the legislature, executive and judiciary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what do the legislature do

A

the form laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

that do the executive do

A

they carry out laws, and are the cabinet ministers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what do the judiciary do

A

they interpret and make judgements on laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are concurrent powers

A

powers that are held by both the state and federal governments, e.g. health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is a double dissolution

A

when both houses are dissolved by the governor general, which happened to the government led by Whitlam in 1975.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what is a joint sitting

A

a meeting between bot houses of parliament to resolve an issue or talk on an issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what is a unicameral system.

A

means one house

positives include:
- more representative
- not complicated or expensive

negatives
- no house of review
- prone to corruption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what is a bicameral system

A

means two houses

positives
- has a house of review (way of making sure people don’t stuff up - senate
- it works

negatives
- more complicated
- not truly democratic (12 senators per state, no matter how small or large it is)
- complicated and expensive

21
Q

what are bureaucratic procedures

A

people do what they should when employed by the government of government agencies.

22
Q

what is the high court

A

primarily adjudicate constitutional matters. also deals with appeals. very occasionally deals with criminal matters.

23
Q

local government

A

one of the three levels of government. not mentioned in the constitution. local government act describes this power

24
Q

what are the three arms of government

A

same as the separation of powers, legislature, executive and judiciary

25
what are the three levels of government
three levels are federal state and local governments
26
27
what is the division of powers
exclusive, concurrent and residual powers.
28
what is a single majority and some aspects of it
when a house only controls the majority of seats in the house of reps, but not the senate. positives - the parties have to negotiate with each other more - promotes responsibility because of this negatives - laws get passed slower or not at all because the houses don't always agree.
29
what is a double majority, and pros and cons of this
a double majority is when both houses are controlled by one political party. pros - laws get passed almost immediately cons - no negotiation - bills always get passed no matter what
30
what is a minority government
when a party doesn't have the number of seats outright, but they win government by having rotes from the cross benches. cross benches are incredibly important in this instance, and negotiations are promoted because of this.
31
what is a bill
a formulation of idea for a law when it it first introduced into the lower house of parliament
32
what is an act
a law after the bill for that law has been passed in both houses
33
what is a division
the votes that take place during the passage of a bill
34
what is a royal asscent
when the governor general sings off on the bill on behalf of the king, turning it into an act
35
what are the 2 types of precedent, describe
1. binding precedent, exactly the same a provides a outline for what the outcome will be 2. persuasive, has aspects that are similar aspects, but is not exactly the same as the current case.
36
describe the governor general
- kings representative in Australia. - can get involved in bills
37
pros and cons of government as a law making body
pros - promotes debate - everyone's views are expressed - representative - negotiation/feedback (responsible) - opposition holds government accountable cons - government always wins, opposition always looses - inefficient (time and money consuming) - senate not democratically representative
38
why is the senate not democratically representative
because there are 12 senators per state, no matter the size, so smaller states like TAS have more sway compared to larger states like WA
39
outline Mabo V Queensland (No. 2)
- recognized native title rites - inserted native title into Australian law, and the fact that Indigenous people have been present is Australia for thousands of years before colonization - created a way for Indigenous people to claim traditional, land, and compensation rights - challenged the British's concept of land ownership, and that the sovereign abolished pre-existing rights
40
Wik Peoples v Queensland
- statutory leases not extinguishing native title rights - follows Mabo - was first voted in favour of Queensland, but was appealed, and was decided in favour of the Wik people. - granting a lease does not extinguish any native title rights
41
New South Wales v. Commonwealth (2006)
- WorkChoices legislation was a valid exercise of federal legislative power under the constitution - plaintiffs argued that the legislation was constitutionally invalid, as not supported by the heads of power - ruled in favour of the commonwealth, commonwealth was valid and did not interfere with the state powers - sought to change the employer-employee relationship
42
Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd
- case against copyright theft - claimed that iiNet was authorizing copyright infringements by not preventing piracy - plaintiffs argued that it was failing to enforce its used agreements - case was found in favour of iiNet - iiNet was not responsible for dealing with people pirating. iiNet was not the means on infringement, an did not have the relevant power to prevent unlawful downloads.
43
R v. Bayliss & Cullen (1986)
- Set a precedent for abortion - Cullen and Bayliss were charged with unlawfully using force to a woman with the intent to procure her miscarriage - They were found not guilty Interpretation of section 282 of the criminal code - performing an abortion was not a criminal offence if not doing so threatened the mother's physical or mental health
44
Al Masri v. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2002)
- Examined the legality of continued or indefinite detention of an asylum seeker
45
Deitric v queen
- Had 70 grams of heroin and got busted - Not guilty unless you are found guilty under a court of law - He was not given the appropriate legal representation, and as such, he did not get his right to a fair trial which means that you aren't guilty. He walked free
46
Fitzgerald Inquiry
- Investigation conducted in Queensland from 1987-1988 - Primarily focused on widespread corruption withing the Queensland police force and government officials - Prompted by media reports and allegations into police corruption and involvement in illegal activities, including prostitution and gambling. - Led to significant reforms in Queensland, exposed high profile officials - Resulted in a new emphasis on accountability, transparency and anti-corruption measures within Queensland.
47
Kevin and Jennifer v Attorney-General for the commonwealth (2001)
- Addressed the legal recognition of gender identity in marriage - Kevin was a transgender man who wanted to marry Jennifer, and sought confirmation that his marriage was valid under Australian law. - The Family Court ruled in favour of Kevin, that gender should be determined at the time of marriage based on a persons lived gender, not their gender at birth - Landmark case for transgender rights Set a precedent for legally recognising gender transition in marital law.
48