unit 3 Flashcards

1
Q

mens rea

A

the guilty ideology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

actus reus

A

voluntary guilty action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

intent

A

when someone intends on performing a criminal action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

motive

A

the reason behind why someone commits a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

recklessness

A

taking an unjustifiable risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

negligence

A

doing or omitting something any reasonable person would have otherwise acted upon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

willful blindness

A

when you willingly turn away from the truth or fact in order to earn something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

strict liability offences

A

does not require men’s rea and can be excused by due diligence in court for those not directly involved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

absolute liability offences

A

an offence that does not require mens rea but cannot have any other defence. results in fines, not jail time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

due diligence

A

steps taken by someone to satisfy a legal requirement, usually buying or selling something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

aiding

A

when someone helps the perpetrator commit the crime but is not at the scene them self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

abetting

A

encouraging someone to commit a crime but not providing any physical assistance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

counselling

A

advising, recommending, and persuading someone to commit a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

accessory after the fact

A

knowing that someone is involved in a crime after it happened and providing them assistance instead of reporting them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

party to a common intention

A

same party as the perpetrator, charged with additional crimes that they were not directly involved with, assumed to have the same intentions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

conspiracy

A

an agreement of two or more people to commit an offence intending a criminal objective that is considered an offence of intent

17
Q

what is the judge’s role

A

guides the court and delivers the final verdict

18
Q

what do the defence and crown attorney do?

A

provide defences for their respective client

19
Q

what does the crown do?

A

tries to prove the guilt of the accused

20
Q

what does the accused do?

A

the accused must defend themselves

21
Q

what does the accused do?

A

defend themselves

22
Q

what does the witness do?

A

provide testimonies for what, where, and when of the crime

23
Q

what does the jury do?

A

they are randomly selected from the public to hear the case and provide their own verdict that the judge will take it into consideration

24
Q

court room setup

A

judge sits at the front with the clerk, crown sits on the left and defense is on the right

25
Q

what are hybrid offences?

A

where the prosecutions can choose to proceed the trial with indictment or summarily

26
Q

what is first degree murder

A

premeditated

27
Q

what is second degree murder

A

second is intentional to kill but not planned

28
Q

manslaughter

A

no intention kill

29
Q

non-culpable homicide

A

self-defence

30
Q

what is B & E

A

breaking and entering a place with intention

31
Q

what does impaired mean

A

when someone is under the influence

32
Q

duress

A

coerced or violently pressured to commit a crime

33
Q

what is provocation

A

when a person commits a crime because of events that happened in the past that caused them to lose control

34
Q

details of the shaw case

A
  • child abandonment
  • shaw’s son was killed in car unsupervised
  • let his son play outside by himself downtown toronto
35
Q

Addy case details

A
  • purchased a satellite dish from stranger
  • charged with possession of stolen item
  • argued that mens rea was justified with willful blindness because of red flags ignored
36
Q

details of coffee throw case

A
  • viviya assaulted by having hot coffee thrown on her
  • bystanders record
  • assailant could be charged with assault
  • bystanders could be charged with party to an offence for abetting
37
Q

kerster case

A
  • tried to email and buy sex services of an 11 year old
  • went out with the constable’s wife who was acting to sell the service on an 11 year old
  • went to hotel got arrested, fake 11 year old, no actus reus
38
Q

r v mcgilivray

A
  • driving boat in a known swimming area
  • group of teens signaled that they were there but he hit them
  • killer one injured others
  • his charge was contrary to section 249 of CC at the time