UNIT 2: What is Power Flashcards
Focusing on theories of Gramsci and Foucault, namely; ideology, hegemony, subjectification, discursive power to understand politics in the realm of civil society, the state and the individual
Gramsci tasks of the political party
- Formulate national popular collective will
- Realize intellectual and moreal reforms
- formulate and guide a collective will
Gramsci on relation of force
- Relation of social forces independent of human will i.e social classes which have specific functions in the production process
- relations of political forces (dependent on consciousness and politicization of classes)
- Relation of military forces (the repressive apparatus of the state)
Gramsci philosophy of praxis
- The merging of the philosophical and empirical traditions
- extension of ML tradition of considering socialism in a non-utopian, materialist basis
- a unity of theory and practice realised in the sphere of ideologies
- practicable only in the sphere of relations of political forces i.e with the condition of an advanced political consciousness
Gramsci on hegemony (description)
Ideology constructed by ruling class and taken to be common sense; the manner through which the masses consent to their subjugation; accepted even by contradictory members of society bc it is the discourse that follows in ‘normal times’; legitimating norms and ideas
Ideology
ideas in service of power; systematized conceptions of the world and it’s structuring in service of the legitimation of a ruling class.
Gramsci on ideology and civil society
politics and power operate in civil society through ideology in service of maintaining structural hegemony; civil society distinct from state mechanism but operates under the superstructure of the state, defined by it’s law and is in service of constructing the conditions necessary for the state’s continuation; exerts a collective pressure
Gramsci theory of the state
the entire complex of practical and theoretical activities with which the ruling class not only justifies and maintains its dominance but manages to win the active consent of those over whom it rules
Althusser materialist conception of ideology
- “not sufficient to renew the means of production, social formation must in the first instance create the conditions of reproduction a)the forces of production and b)the relations of production”
- ideology determines the way a human being acts, thinks and produces
- rejects notion of an independent human will that can function outside of the superstructural (ideological) determinants
Gramsci up down and down up mobility of power
- ideology and hegemony function from top down to instill common sense and manufacture consent of subjugated classes
- through class conscientization (the realisation of a collective end and subsequent generation of collective will) and praxis, organic intellectuals can arise
- organic intellectuals challenge hegemonic ideology, generating a new revolutionary ideological power that allows social group to modify power relations and reconstruct society in accordance with the new collective will
Michel Foucault
- French post structuralist
- studied under Althusser
- theorized power and society through discourse analysis and genealogy
- power is ubiquitous; omnipresent; diffused to the “very grains of individuals” rather than strictly structuralist in the marxist paradigm
- looked at the political technology of the body; how power operates on the physical, material person
Foucault and objectification/subjection
- power arises through discursive norms that categorize man into subjects
- subjects may be political/economic (proletariat/producing), sexual (gay, straight), gendered (man, woman), pathologized (mad, sane) etc
- domination and social/political hierarchies function through the process of subjection
- identities are not intrinsic and are gained through socialization, these identities then ensure forms of discrimination and marginalisation
Foucault on power and subjects (quote)
“this form of power applies itself to immediate everyday life which catergorizes the individual, marks him by his own individuality, attaches him to his own identity, imposes a law of truth on him which he must recognize and which others must recognize in him. It is a form of power which makes individuals subjects”
Foucault and the state
- centrality of the state over emphasized in political analysis
- state has both totalizing and individualising power
- wrong to equate power with law and repression of the state apparatus
- state has power in disciplinary normalization
foucault on power
- the name that one attributes to a complex strategical situation in a particular society: power is not an institution, and not a structure; neither is it a certain strength that we are endowed with. Power is omnipresent, it comes from everywhere and is produced at every moment
- no binary opposition between rulers and ruled
- power relations are both intentional and non subjective, no power without aim and objective but there are no headquarters of power either
- diffused
Foucault and governmentality general
- concerning how to govern oneself and how to govern others
- speaks of governance not simple in the context of government over a polity
- establish a continuity in both an upward and downward direction, transmitting to individual behaviour and the ruling of the state
- discipline and the management of a population not only in terms of an aggregate but of the individual