Unit 2 - Rights and Freedoms Flashcards
To help you understand the various cases and sections of the charter for your quiz.
SCC decision made it legal for stores to stay open on a Sunday
R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd (1985)
Created a test in order to determine the validity of a freedom of expression argument. Based on the test, the SCC decided that a Quebec law that restricted advertising directed to children was valid.
Irwin Toy Co Ltd v. Quebec (AG)
Someone can publish any information, even false information, as long as the expression is not violent, or incites violence
R. v. Zundel (1992)
Teacher was charged with a violation of establishing hate crimes within the classroom; you cannot incite hate-speech in schools
R. V. KEEGSTRA (1990)
Allows students to learn about world religions in school
LOYOLA H.S. V. QUEBEC (2015)
Established restrictions on pending money towards political parties during an election campaign by third parties.
Harper v. Canada (2004)
It gave the right to vote back to Canadians who were sentenced to jail for more than 2 years.
Sauve v. Canada (2002)
The mobility of rights of moving products/goods has to be in accordance to laws already existing. Also, corporations have the same rights as individuals to make a living.
Cdn. Egg Marketing v. Richardson (1998)
SCC decided If a person commits a crime, and its impact has an effect on another country, then that person can be extradited from Canada to the other country to face charges
U.S. V. COTRONI (1989)
This case is the first case to deal with extradition (committing a crime in another country and being sent to that country without receiving the death penalty – Can face penalties IF the individual is a not a Canadian Citizen)
Kindler v. Canada (1991)
SCC decision gave woman the right to choose to have an abortion.
R. v. Morgentaler (1988)
If you commit a crime in a country with the death penalty, you cannot receive the death penalty if you are a Canadian citizen.
U.S. V. BURNS (2001)
Decision focused on the legality of strip searches conducted by the police as part of a search incident to arrest; Police cannot conduct a strip search in public. Must be within the confines of the warrant.
R. v. Golden (2001)
SCC established a test that provides the factors to be considered in determining whether a search conducted by a teacher or principal in the school environment is reasonable.
R v. M (1998)
This cased dealt with the legality of using sniffer dogs in schools. Sniffer dogs are not allowed.
R. v. AM (2008)