Unit 2: Questions Flashcards

1
Q

Gammon v Hong Kong ltd

A

Strict liability
Outlined rules for strict liability
1. Must be in favour of MR
2. Can’t be used when criminal case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Shah v London

A

Strict liability - Social concern

Child under 16 bought lottery ticket (gambling)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v White

A

Causation - But for Test

Cyanide in mothers cup, died before drinking. But for his actions she would have still died

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Alpha cell v Woodward

A

Strict liability - protecting enviroment

Tried to prevent pollution, but polluted water when making paper in factory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v smith

A

Causation

D kept falling off stretcher and died of injuries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Jordan

A

Causation - Novus Actus

Wrong antibiotics were given and died of result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Roberts

A

Causation - D’s own actions

Jumped out of car, feared driver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Blaue

A

Thin skull rule

Could not have blood transfusion and died. Take victim as you find them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hill v Baxter

A

Omissions

If driving and attacked by bees, would not be guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define omissions

A

Failure to act when you have a duty to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dytham

A

Omission - contact duty

Policeman did not stop a fight when on duty outside a club

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Miller

A

Omissions - failure to act in situation

cigarette on a mattress caused fire, woke up and did not out fire out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v pittwood

A

Omissions- contractual duty

Did not close train gate when on break while in duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Gibbons v proctor

A

Omissions- family relationship

Man did not feed child as it was stepdaughter not actual daughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define Mens Rea

A

Having the guilty mind, can be split into three parts:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mohan

A

MR - Direct intent

“The decision to bring about, lies within such powers to the actual actual consequence”

17
Q

Woolin

A

MR - Indirect intent

Threw baby in pram, missed and baby died

18
Q

R v Cunningham

A

MR - Recklessness

Tried to break gas meter, caused gas leak and damaged neighbours

19
Q

Define recklessness

A

MR
Having an unjustified risk
And D takes the risk anyway

20
Q

Define indirect intent

A

MR
Result was virtually certain to happen
D knew the risk, but took it anyway

21
Q

Define strict liability

A

Offences that do not require Mens Rea only Actus Rea

22
Q

Sweet v Parsley

A

Strict Liability

Teacher allowed student to use summer cottage, was not aware of drug abuse

23
Q

Reasons for Strict liability

A
Strict liability
 Saves time - "speeding tickets"
 Protecting Public
 Social concern 
 Protecting enviroment
24
Q

R v Latimer

A

Transferred Malice

Man tried to hit someone with belt, missed and hit someone else

25
Q

Pembleton

A

Transferred Malice

Threw stone into crowd, missed and broke window

26
Q

Define Transferred Malice

A

When the crime moved from the intended victims to the actual victim. Must be both from the same nature