Unit 2 - Levels of Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

what is the definition of “level of evidence”?

A
  • graded down on basis of study quality, imprecision, indirectness (study PICO doesn’t match questiosn PICO) because of inconsistency between studies, or because absolute effect is very small
  • graded up if there is large or very large effect size
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

which is better, a systematic review or an individual study?

A

systematic review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how common is a step/level 1?

A

local and current random sample surveys/censuses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how common is a step/level 2?

A

systematic review of surveys that allow matching to local circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how common is a step/level 3?

A

local non-random sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how common is a step/level 4?

A

case-series

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how accurate is the diagnostic/monitoring test for step/level 1?

A

systematic review of X-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how accurate is the diagnostic/monitoring test for step/level 2?

A

individual X-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how accurate is the diagnostic/monitoring test for step/level 3?

A

non-consecutive studies, or studies without consistently applied reference standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how accurate is the diagnostic/monitoring test for step/level 4?

A

case-control studies, or poor/non-independent reference standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how accurate is the diagnostic/monitoring test for step/level 5?

A

mechanism-based reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what will happen if we don’t add a therapy (prognosis) for step/level one?

A

systematic review of inception cohort studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what will happen if we don’t add a therapy (prognosis) for two?

A

inception cohort studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what will happen if we don’t add a therapy (prognosis) for 3?

A

cohort study or control arm of randomized trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what will happen if we don’t add a therapy (prognosis) for 4?

A

case-series or case-control studies, or poor quality prognostic cohort study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

does this intervention help (treatment benefits) in step/level 1?

A

systematic review`` of randomized trails of n-of-1 trials

17
Q

does this intervention help (treatment benefits) in step/level 2?

A

randomized trial or observational study with dramatic effect

18
Q

does this intervention help (treatment benefits) in step/level 3?

A

non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study

19
Q

does this intervention help (treatment benefits) in step/level 4?

A

case-series, or case-control studies, or historically controlled studies

20
Q

does this intervention help (treatment benefits) in step/level 5?

A

mechanism-based reasoning

21
Q

what are the common/rare (treatment) harms in terms of step/level 1?

A

systematic review of randomized trials, systematic review of nested case-control studies, n-of-1 trial witht he patient you are raising the question about, or observational study with dramatic effect
-if rare, only RCT or n-of-1 trials

22
Q

what are the common/rare (treatment) harms in terms of step/level 2?

A

individual randomized trial or (exceptionally) observational study with dramatic effect
-if rare, then not individual

23
Q

what are the common/rare (treatment) harms in terms of step/level 3?

A

non-randomized controlled cohort/follow up study (post-marketing surveillance) provided there are sufficient numbers to rule out a common harm (for long term, duration of follow-up must be sufficient)

24
Q

what are the common/rare (treatment) harms in terms of step/level 4?

A

case-series, case-control, or historically controlled studies

25
Q

what are the common/rare (treatment) harms in terms of step/level 5

A

mechanism-based reasoning

26
Q

is this screening test worthwhile in regards to step/level 1

A

systematic review of RCT

27
Q

is this screening test worthwhile in regards to step/level 2

A

randomized trial

28
Q

is this screening test worthwhile in regards to step/level 3?

A

non-randomized controlled cohort/follow up study

29
Q

is this screening test worthwhile in regards to step/level 4?

A

case-series, case-control, or historically controlled studies

30
Q

is this screening test worthwhile in regards to step/level 5?

A

mechanism-based learning