Unit 2 Flashcards
What should diagnostic (assessment) procedures be?
- systematic & organized for specific purpose
- merely assembling facts is insufficient
- findings must be correlated to provide a meaningful explanation for the clients periodontal condition
What is the rationale behind assessing the overall appraisal of the client
assess physical appearance
- color
- talking
- anxiety
- walking
What is the rational behind assessing the medical history of a client?
-some hygiene procedures can exacerbate some conditions
What is the rational behind assessing the dental history of a client?
- do they attend regularly
- can they afford it
- experiences
- LA reactions
- what’s their chief complaint - what is their priority which is our responsibility to respect
What are some limitations of conventional periodontal diagnostic techniques?
- date respresents a disease/health evaluation at one point in time
- clinicians need to attempt to identify, quantify and determine the extent, severity and relevance of both current clinical signs of inflammation as well as historical evidence of damage
- sites of active disease can not be reliably identified or progression accurately predicted
What do the ideal perio diagnostic tools provide?
- all causes of the condition or differences in client susceptibility to disease
- clear information on whether the infection is progressing or in remission
- whether response to treatment will be positive or negative
Keep in mind that the current view of the natural history of disease susceptibility is related to the entire person vs just the local site (host response is largely generalized)
What do the ideal perio diagnostic tools provide?
- all causes of the condition or differences in client susceptibility to disease
- clear information on whether the infection is progressing or in remission
- whether response to treatment will be positive or negative
Keep in mind that the current view of the natural history of disease susceptibility is related to the entire person vs just the local site (host response is largely generalized)
What are some limitations/disadvantages to clinical perio probing?
- probe won’t reach the base of the sulcus
- size of tip
- tooth morphology
- angulation
- depth/pressure
- presence of calculus
- tissue resistance of JE
- differences in clinician
What is the significance of probing?
- the only reliable method of detecting pockets
- clinical and biologic probing depths are not the same
What are some diagnostic tools that have been developed to resolve some of the limitations of conventional perio probing? Limitations?
Florida Pack
- automated and computer assisted pressure sensitive probe
- standardize the proving force, registration stents to standardize angulation
- recordings are automatically entered with foot switch or voice activated command
What is the role/significance of bleeding on probing as a diagnostic tool for perio disease?
- A reliable indicator of the presence of inflammation
- Non-inflammed sites rarely bleed
- In most cases BOP is an earlier sign of inflammation than color changes
What are limitations of BOP for diagnostic purposes in perio disease?
-Not a good predictor of progressive LOA unless present in multiple sites of advanced disease
What is the significance of suppuration as a diagnostic indicator?
- Signifies the presence of large #’s of PMN’s
- Present in a low # of diseased sites, therefore not itself a good predictor or disease progression
-host response
0larger standing infection
-does not indicate seriousness of infection
What is the difference between pocket depth and CAL?
Pocket depth:
- Distance between base of pocket and margin
- May change due to changes in the position of the margin and migration of JE (margin and JE are not fixed points)
CAL
- Distance between base of pocket and CEJ
- Changes in LOA can result form gain or loss of attachment
- Because one of the measurements is from a fixed point, CAL provides better indication of the amount and/or progression of attachment loss
Briefly describe the methods and limitation in determining whether there is disease activity (active vs. inactive lesion)
- No current accurate method to determine activity or inactivity of a lesion – only indicators of risk
- Difference in CAL will show there has been disease activity but it is not predictive of further loss “isolated data”
- Lesions show signs of inflammation are at high risk for further breakdown
Briefly describe the methods and limitation in determining whether there is disease activity (active vs. inactive lesion)
- No current accurate method to determine activity or inactivity of a lesion – only indicators of risk
- Difference in CAL will show there has been disease activity but it is not predictive of further loss “isolated data”
- Lesions show signs of inflammation are at high risk for further breakdown
What is the value in radiographs when assessing perio disease?
- Diagnosis of p.d., estimation of severity, determination of prognosis & evaluation of outcome
- Most useful in evaluating interprox. bone: level and density
What are the limitation of radiographs when assessing perio disease?
- 2 dimensional picture of a 3 dimensional object
- Does not show depth & width in buc & ling direction
- Shows only hard tissue changes and not minor bone changes
- like CAL, only a measure of past loss and not current disease activity
What are the limitation of radiographs when assessing perio disease?
- 2 dimensional picture of a 3 dimensional object
- Does not show depth & width in buc & ling direction
- Shows only hard tissue changes and not minor bone changes
- like CAL, only a measure of past loss and not current disease activity
How do we currently assess whether there is active disease?
clinical visible signs of inflammation