Unit 2 Flashcards

1
Q

What is ideal and non ideal theory? (Carens)

A

Perfection and compliance (ideal) vs reality (non ideal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Carens’ basic argument for open borders?

A

Equal moral worth between persons; closed borders deny equal worth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does Carens mean by “birthright citizenship is like a feudal privilege?”

A

Problem is NOT citizenship at birth’ inability to change citizenship IS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What makes political community valuable? (Carens)

A

Autonomy- ability to make your own choice
Identity- ability to express and revise their identities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What argument does Carens give for extending birthright citizenship to children of (1) citizens, (2) emigrants, (3) immigrants, and (4) irregular migrants?

A

Citizens: value political community
Emigrants: weighty interest
Immigrants: political community
Irregular: undocumented migrant rights increase over time; state
right to deport decreases over time

ALL: appeal to the equal worth of persons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Putnam’s thesis?

A

Gentrification induced displacement is pro tanto (some things considered) unjust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Putnam’s nexus of domination?

A

The state, landlords, and gentrifying residents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What produces gentrification? (Putnam)

A

Low-income tenants
Unaffordable rent
Affluent influx

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the harms of gentrification? (Putnam)

A

Continuity of residence
Located attachments
Security of shelter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is domination? (Putnam)

A

The capacity to interfere arbitrarily with others’ morally weighty preferences (basic goods)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is first-order domination? (Putnam)

A

landlord-tenant relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is higher-order domination? (Putnam)

A

dependence on arbitrary preferences that determine domination at the first-order level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does higher-order domination occur? (Putnam) (Arrow chart)

A

Potential gentrifiers -> critical mass -> desiredness begets desirablilty -> (back to potential gentrifiers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why is rental housing a special commodity? (Putnam)

A

Basicness (like food or water)
Relationality (obtained with high exit costs, unlike food)
Non-fungibility (equally priced units cannot be substituted without costs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What policy interventions does Putnam propose?

A

Subsidies
Rent control
Increase supply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who is morally responsible for gentrification from most to least important? (Putnam)

A

The state
Landlord
Gentrifiers
Citizens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is M. Friedman’s thesis?

A

The only social responsibility of business is to make profit and abide by the rules of the game (open competition without deception or fraud)

18
Q

Three arguments that M. Friedman gives against social responsibility

A

Social responsibility is vague
Only individualism is coherent
Social responsibility undermines the scope of the political mechanism

19
Q

Non-consequentialist moral argument against social responsibility? (M. Friedman)

A

Socially responsible exec is essentially imposing taxes, which should remain a gov. function

20
Q

Consequentialist moral argument against social resp. (M. Friedman)

A

Knowledge objection: execs have the knowledge to help business, not to make society better
Practical objection: a socially responsible exec will be fired and replaced

21
Q

What is F&F’s thesis?

A

Wealth without limits- reject limitarianism

22
Q

What is limitarianism’s argument? (F&F)

A

Officials should enforce taxes to benefit the poor
Taxing billionaires to abolishment would benefit the poor
Therefore, we should tax billionaires to abolish them

23
Q

What is F&F’s method of argument?

A

Comparative: public officials v the private billionaire
Incentive-based: billionaires, even those who inherit their wealth, have better incentives than public officials
Egalitarian: consistent with distributive equality; abolishing billionaires would make the world less equal, increase poverty, etc.

24
Q

F&F arguments in defense of billionaires

A

Collective Action: billionaires are in a better position to solve collective action problems than public officials
Accountability: billionaires are more accountable than public officials

25
Why is the gov. bad at collective action? (F&F)
Poor incentives: they spend YOUR money, not theirs Exacerbate harm: defense spending, unjust policing, etc.
26
Why are billionaires good at collective action? (F&F)
Take risks: driving moral progress Hedge: against wasteful gov spending Increase opportunities: ex iphones create opportunities "Status-equal": ex Elon bought a platform where people tell him to die
27
Why are billionares more accountable? (F&F)
Consent Scope Responsive Symmetry Non-citizens
28
What is the remedy to social ills? (F&F)
Regulation Reject Cronyism (stop wealthy people from using wealth to buy influence) Meh. Not pressing.
29
What is capitalism? (Marx)
Self ownership of labor Private property and control of means of production Markets are the mech. of input and output, determine surplus usage
30
Marx's arrow chart?
Slavery -> Feudalism -> Capitalism -> Socialism -> Communism
31
According to Marx, where does profit come from?
Theory of surplus Value: All profit comes from labor good-labor=profit
32
How does Marx arrive at TSV? Arrow chart
Labor theory of value -> subsistence-level wage -> TSV -> surplus value
33
What are Marx's moral critiques of capitalism?
Exploitation: using the worker as a means to an end. Capitalist takes SV from worker Alienation: violation of perfect human flourishing
34
What are the 4 violations of human flourishing through alienation? (Marx)
Products of labor Self Others Species Essence- human nature to flourish
35
What is Flanigan's thesis about sweatshop work?
Unacceptable and unavailable alternatives cannot justify regulations on sweatshops
36
What is the choice argument? (Flanigan)
- Gov. should not interfere with permissible and valuable choice - SC are permissible and valuable choices - Regs. interfere with permissible and valuable choice So, reg. on sweatshops bad
37
Why is sweatshop work permissible? (Flanagan)
not intrinsically unjust, other risky jobs are OK
38
Why is sweatshop work valuable? (Flanaghan)
autonomy, financial independence subjective vs objective values
39
Objections to choice argument: (Flanaghan)
Unacceptable alternatives: exploitation, involuntary choice Unavailable alternatives: coordination issue- workers would opt for better conditions if they could
40
Flanaghan's arguments against unACCEPTABLE alternatives
Idealistic- fails to consider whether there are feasible policy descriptions Regulations constrain- don't provide more opportunities and constrain both the employee and employer No special obligations No double disadvantage
41
Flanaghan's arguments against unAVAILABLE alternatives?
Positive sum- still benefit Non-group Repetition- workers continue to stay employed