Unit 2 Flashcards
CR
Conditional response
(pp. 60–62) define and what terms are used in place of these terms?
CS
Conditional stimulus
GSR
Galvanic skin response
NS
Neutral stimulus
S
Stimulus
UR
Unconditional response
US
Unconditional stimulus
ISI
interstimulus interval
Pavlov’s early life, career > study in dogs
Study: digestive processes and the salivary reflex
Life:
Career:
What psychic secretions did Pavlov study?
When and why?
(p. 59, 57-60)
What: Events in the dogs environment
When:
Why: Fascinated by The dogs began to salivate before receiving food.????
The experiment in which the dog learned to salivate at the sight of a black square after it had been paired with a CS for salivating is an example of XXX?
Higher Order
neutral stimulus
(p. 61)
the conditional stimulus before it is able to elicit the conditional response (does not elicit a particular conditioned or unconditioned response)
IE: hand clap before it could elicit the conditional response, salivation
Describe Wallace and Rosen’s demonstration.
How does this assist in survival? (pp. 60–61)
rats show a strong response to an odorous chemical derived from fox feces.
Survival:
IE: an organism whose behaviour is subject to Pavlovian conditioning is more likely to survive than an organism whose behaviour is not subject to such conditioning (p. 63)
original
Is the presentation of the two stimuli (i.e., the neutral stimulus and the unconditional stimulus) independent of the behaviour of the animal?
(p. 63)
why
higher-order Pavlovian conditioning
(pp. 63–64)
neutral stimulus is paried with a conditional stimulus to function as an unconditional stimulus
Why does higher-order conditioning increase the importance of Pavlovian conditioning?
(pp. 63–64)
Describe Graham and Desjardins’ (1980) study. (pp. 63–64)
experimenters used Pavlovian conditioning to influence the mating behaviour of male rats
second-order conditioning
the CS (CS-0) predicts another previously established CS (CS-1). The CS-1 obtained its ability to elicit a CR because it was paired with a US for a UR.
third-order conditioning
CS-0 is paired with a CS-1 that gained its ability to elicit a response by being paired with a previously established CS (CS-2), whereas CS-2 gained its eliciting function by being paired with a US
Effectiveness of second-order, third, etc. conditioning
note: number of steps that the CS is removed from a US.
second-order conditioning can be quite effective, third-order conditioning (and further removed orders) have not generally been demonstrated to be very potent forms of conditioning. Fifth-order conditioning has been noted if the US is a shock, but generally the further away you get from the pairing with the US, the weaker the CR is likely to be.
Describe Staats and Staats’ (1957) classic experiment.
(pp. 63–64)
verbal higher-order conditioning
How can response latency be used to measure Pavlovian conditioning? How is the use of latency as a measure of Pavlovian conditioning problematic? (pp. 65–66)
Describe the use of test trials to measure Pavlovian conditioning.
(p. 65)
original IE of this use of test trials
Describe the method of measuring Pavlovian conditioning by means of intensity or amplitude of the CR.
IE
(p. 65)
original