Unit 1: Language and Interaction: Frames, DMs, speech activities Flashcards
What are the characteristics of discourse markers?
- They are deictic expressions (they work as signals) as they guide the interlocutors’ attention to a common focus of attention.
- They are cues of contextual conditions of the interlocutor’s identity
- They are deictic expressions that have a core meaning that doesn’t change, but their interpretation changes every time they are used. 4. They take on unique and situated meaning in each context and contribute to creating the context.
- DMs have an organizational dimension/a cohesive function: They orient the interlocutor’s attention to the different parts of a text and indicate the relationship between them.
- They also express modal meaning and social meaning simultaneously
- They are DISCOURSE DEICTICS (not just text deictics) because, in addition to their cohesive function, they include the interpersonal or social dimension and the modal dimension of deixis. Their function goes beyond the text.
- They indicate relationships between discourse units at multiple planes of discourse organization.
What is deixis? Are all discourse markers deictic? What types of deixis can you mention?
Deixis is a property and it is to do with pointing at someone, at a place or at a moment in time. There are four types of deixis: personal deixis, Spatial deixis, temporal deixis and discourse deixis.
No, not all DMs are deictics.
Why are DMs contextualization cues?
Because DMs contribute to the signalling of contextual presuppositions
What English discourse markers indicate the initiation of a self-repair?
The initiation of a self-repair can be indicated by the discourse markers “I mean”, “Look”, “Listen” and “Well” acting mainly at the ideational plane of discourse organization.
How do self-repairs, on the one hand, and background-repairs, on the other hand, reveal that speakers design their talk taking their audience into consideration?
Self-repairs are SEQUENTIAL UNITS that involve repairing, correcting, or modifying what the speaker has just said. This correction/modification of the previos ideational unit shows that the speaker monitors his/her own speech and analyses if the audience accepts the assertion or not.
In discourse analysis, background repairs, indicate the segment that interrupts the dramatic action. These segments add background information that was not mention in the orientation section. In this repairs, there are DMs that function as brackets (because…anyway) indicating the beginning and the end of a segment (bracketing function).
What is the best approach to account for discourse markers: a grammatical one or an interactional one?
Interactional approaches is the best approach as it encompases the cohesive and modal functions explains its relations to the dimension of activity.
Discourse markers are “pointers” since they focus our interlocutors’ attention on the basis of a common orientation? What is this property?
The property of deixis
Why can’t we say DMs mark?
Because they only function as signals and cues of contextual conditions. If the DMs weren’t present, the meaning of the proportions would still be the same
Do DMs have a semantic meaning?
Yes, but it is bleached. Their contribution is pragmatic rather than semantic.
Are DMs cohesive?
Yes, they signal relationships bw discourse units at different planes of discourse organization.
What is the contribution of DMs to the speech activity?
They can signal a shift in frame and orient/guide the interlocutors’ attention to a common focus of attention. They can signal when a turn begins and ends, they can signal the type of speech act, and they can also signal the ideas that the interlocutors want to express.
What is the contribution of discourse markers to social relations?
DMs can evoke a relationship of closeness or distance (soc meaning), as well as symmetrical and asymmetrical relationships (soc relationship). For instance, the DM y’know evokes a relationship of closeness since it signals that the information is assumed to be shared among the interlocutors.
What is the contribution of DMs to the text?
Cohesion
What is the importance/relevance of DM in the online (ongoing) production of discourse?
The use of discourse markers guides interlocutors, guides interpretations, signals how discourse is organized.
They orient interlocutors’ attention to segments of the text and signal the relationship between them.
What segment is typically prefaced by “well” and “look” in mid-turn position?
A dispreferred response.
Which discourse marker typically signals that, after a detour, a speaker is going back to a previous content unit/action?
The DM “anyway”, which is resumptive, as it signals that the speaker will resume a previous idea.
What do code choice and discourse markers have in common in relation to the speech activity?
Code choice and DMs can index shifts in frame. For instance, shifting from English to Spanish to talk about gossip during an English lesson at school can signal a change from the frame lesson to the frame gossip. In the same way, the DM ‘well’ can also signal a shift from the frame break to the frame lesson when a teacher says ‘Well, the break is over. Let’s start the class.’