Unit 1 Introducing FS and SP Flashcards

1
Q

“Hunger”

A

o an uneasy sensation occasioned by the lack of food
o a weakened condition brought about by prolonged lack of food
1.1.1.1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

“Malnutrition”

A

Faulty nutrition due to inadequate or unbalanced intake of nutrients or their impaired assimilation or utilization (first known use of word: 1862) (Merriam-Webster online dictionary)
1.1.1.1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

“Food Security” - current vs. earlier definitions

A

Situation that exists when all people (distribution), at all times (stability), have physical (availability), social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious (utilization) food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences (cultural acceptability) for an active and healthy life (FAO 2002: current widely accepted).

1.1.2.1 Evolving, broadening, more complex definition since 1948 (though practical responses = narrower p.16)

Prior definitions:
 Right to adequate living standard (Universal Declaration of Human rights 1948)
 Improve production, conservation, distribution methods (…) ensure equitable distribution of food supplies (ICESCR 1966).
 Every man, woman, child has inalienable right to be free from hunger and malnutrition (Universal Declaration of Eradication of H&M 1974)
 Availability at all times of adequate world food supplies of basic foodstuffs to sustain a steady expansion of consumption and to offset fluctuation in production and prices (World Food Summit 1974 – 1. int. agreed definition)
 Ensuring that all people (distribution), at all times (stability), have physical (availability) and economic access (access) to basic food that they need. (FAO 1983)
 Food security, at the individual, household, national, regional and global levels [is achieved] when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life (World food summit 1996).

(Unit 1.1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

“Food availability”

&Policy

A

“The availability of SUFFICIENT quantities of food of appropriate QUALITY, supplied through domestic production or import (including food aid)” (FAO 2006)

Policy: Enhance production, trade flows, build stock, aid (emergency).

70s and recent years: Concern due to global food price rise; “availability” in early food security definitions.

(Unit 1, also see Unit 5)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Food “Access”

How was it popularized?

A

“Access by individuals to adequate resources (entitlements) for acquiring appropriate foods for a nutritious diet”

A. Sen’s Analysis (80s) of large scale famines: ¾ famines had no availability decline! Can coexist with export of food. Access by different groups = issue. Changes international debate to access/entitlements.

(Unit 1.1, also see unit 6)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

“Utilisation”

Whose responsibility?

A

“Utilization of food through adequate diet, clean water, sanitation and health care to reach a state of nutritional well-being where all physiological needs are met. This brings out the importance of nonfood inputs in food security.” (FAO 2006)
Determined by healthy food choice and good health to digest.

Whose responsibility? 70s: Agriculturalist, trade specialists, home economists, doctors? Post-70s: Multisectoral, collaborative approach not very successful (ministries of health, welfare, women’s department? ministries of food, agriculture, industrial dev.? – split between agencies). Unresolved issue.

(Unit 1.1, also see Unit 7)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

“Nutrition security”

A

“Nutrition security is achieved when secure access to food is coupled with a sanitary environment, adequate health services, and knowledgeable care to
ensure a healthy and active life for all household members. The ability of an individual to fully reach his or her personal and economic potential, however defined, must depend to a large degree on his or her level of nutrition security.” (Benson 2004)

No internationally agreed definition, confusion due to lack of consistent use of terms (UNCFS).

(Unit 1.1 p.19)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

“Stability” of access to food

What causes unstable access?

A

“To be food secure, a population, household or individual must have access to adequate food at all times. They should not risk losing access to food as a consequence of sudden shocks (eg an economic or climatic crisis) or cyclical events (eg seasonal food insecurity). The concept of
stability can therefore refer to both the availability and access dimensions of food security.” (FAO 2006)

CHRONIC (long-term), TRANSITORY (temporary, due to conflict, price rises, disasters), SEASONAL (annual hungry period) food insecurity

Unit 1.1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does normalisation of crisis refer to?

A

Policy reaction to transitory, but not to chronic food insecurity although chronic (e.g. 13% malnutrition in Somalia) can be more acute (severe) than transitory (e.g. rise from 2.5 to 5% malnutrition in another SSA country). Can be due to confounding “acute” with “transitory”! Important distinction. (Devereux)

Unit 1.1 - stability of access p.20

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dimensions of well-being according to „voices of the poor“ (Narayan, WB, 2000)

A
  1. Material wellbeing (having enough food, assets, work)
  2. Bodily well-being (being and appearing well, physical environment)
  3. Social well-being (being able to care for, bring up, marry, settle children; self-respect and dignity; peace, harmony, good relations with family, community)
  4. Security (civil peace, physically safe and secure environment, physical security, lawfulness and access to justice, old age security, confidence in future)
  5. Freedom of choice and action
  6. Psychological well-being (peace of mind, happiness, harmony)

(Unit 1.2.1.1 p.23)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the main differences between food security and nutrition security, as reflected in the definitions given by FAO (2006) and Benson (2004)?

A

Nutrition depends on additional factors such as health, sanitation, care and knowledge and choice of healthy food. Some of these concepts are supposed to be included in the food security concept of ‘utilisation’, but in practice the focus of food security tends to be on food rather than non-food factors affecting nutrition.
(Unit 1.1 self assessment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Poverty: different definitions based on…

1.2.1

A

o Dimensions of well-being according to „voices of the poor“
o Income poverty, money metric, consumption poverty: lack of goods and services (consumption) and money (income) to purchase these. Widely used. Criticism: money cannot buy happiness, does not measure what is important to people.
-Absolute (below given poverty line) vs. relative (fraction of median income).
-Chronic (always, usually) vs. transient (churning, occasionally) poverty & non-poor (1.2.1 f)
-Lifecycle and dependency ratio - maternity and old age support (1.2.1 g)
o Basic needs: deprivation of material needs, then psychological needs (Maslow’s hierarchy 1943). No agreement on what constitutes “basic needs”. Conceptual issue: making poor choices ”poor”?
o Happiness: quantifies qualitative perceptions of poor people, e.g. Bhutan’s “Gross National Happiness.” Criticism: poor, oppressed people can report being “happy”.
o Capabilities and Human Development: (Sen 1999 “Development as Freedom”). Poverty = unfreedoms to realize full potential; objectives of development = mobilize capabilities & functionings. Taken up in HDR (UNDP 1990), HDI. Human development = process of enlarging people’s choices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

“Vulnerability”
“Shock”
“Uncertainty”
“Risk”

A

Vulnerability
o Condition of weakness, defencelessness
o Lack of ability to cope with or mitigate effect of shocks (vs. resilience: capacity to absorb or mitigate shocks without long-term decline in wellbeing)
o Combination of likely exposure and inability to cope with shocks, thus higher probability of passing below given welfare threshold (poverty, food insecurity) (definition used in module).

  • Shock = uncertain event with negative welfare effect; natural or man-made; idiosyncratic, common, covariate.
  • Uncertainty = potential shock which is not sufficiently predictable to be insurable, e.g. earthquake

Risk
o Potential shock whose probability can be predicted to some extent (insurable)

Unit 1.2.2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
Coping strategies (in developing countries)
and disadvantages
A
Ex post strategies:
food selection (inferior foods), infant feeding, food intake, credit, social capital, extra work, cut non-food consumption, sell assets, socially adverse strategies; most damaging: eating seeds intended for planting; 

Ex ante risk management strategies:

  1. Lower risk activities, e.g. less investment, lower loss (poorest=risk-averse! less lucrative);
  2. diversification of production: no economies of scale; diversify livelihoods: social and health risk – HIV; 3. risk sharing, e.g. share cropping: reduces overall reward
  3. keep buffer, i.e. build up assets, savings in cash or kind, social credit (support networks): opportunity cost, value loss; informal social networks: excludes migrants, minorities, etc; credit: social risk of non-repayment, asset seizure
  4. formal insurance (increasing in poor area: health, crop, weather, vaccination of animals): reduces profit.

(Unit 1.2.2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Causes of poverty trap

and implications

A

Ex-post strategies undermine human and physical capital, no livelihood development (trade-off between current and future consumption )

Ex-ante strategies reduce poor hh profit in favour of stability (trade-off between risk aversion and profit maximisation: poor choose defensive strategy)

Implications: lower household wealth, soc. networks discourage investment at community level, leading to lower economic growth. Social protection can help overcome vulnerability

Poor disproportionately affected by shocks, thus inequality is perpetuated.

Unit 1.2.2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

“Livelihood”

“Sustainable livelihood”

A

“A livelihood comprises the capabilities, assets (including both material and social resources) and activities for a means of living.”
“A livelihood is sustainable when it can cope with and recover from stresses and shocks, maintain or enhance its capabilities and assets, while not undermining the natural resource base.”

(Scoones 2009)
Unit 1.2.3

17
Q

Use of SLF

A

Use of SLF in practice:
identify entry points, starts with hh (vs. macro-economy), holistic perspective; what makes hh vulnerable now and in future? What capitals support them? How are policies and institution affecting present and future livelihoods?
(see 1.2.3.3) Entry points (Swiss development cooperation):
1. Policies, institutional change (pro-poor growth);
2. Services for poor (SP, legal advice);
3. Hh strategy development (diversification…);
4. Promote access to assets (increase Y…);
5. Prevent risk, reduce vulnerability (mitigation)

Unit 1.2.3

18
Q

Limitations of SLF

A
  1. Ignores transformatory shifts in rural economies (markets, technology, globalization);
  2. Hard to scale up /use within sectoral institutions (gvt ministries);
  3. Broad analysis but no particular type of solution;
  4. Depoliticizes: objectifies what are political decisions

Unit 1.2.3

19
Q

How has SP coverage in poor countries changed since 1980s?

What factors influenced the changing discourse?

A

80s/90s: Washington Consensus deems SP a luxury in developing countries, diminished gvt role; markets to provide and benefits to trickle down. Focus on macroeconomic stability (structural adjustment policies);

WC’s social safety net approach: limited, temporary social spending to cushion adverse SAP effects and gain political support

2000s: Changing discourse, increased SP spending due to: MDGs (prioritise social measures, pressure on donors);
PROGRESA (Large-scale cash transfer programme in MX with positive results);
PSNP (Ethiopia’s productive safety nets programme as sustainable alternative to donor aid);
NREGA (India: right to temporary employment for rural poor).

(Unit 1.3)

20
Q

Sources of different values underpinning SP thinking (5)

A

1 What are the desirable moral objectives (e.g. gender equality?)
2 How is poverty defined? Definition (income vs. happiness etc.) determines priorities
3 How can objectives be reached? Market-led vs. state-led theories on growth & HD
4 What is the desirable balance between objectives? (growth vs. poverty reduction, equity vs. efficiency)
5 Are minimum living standards and equality rights, options, or culturally determined? Absolute views (human rights based, moral and legal rights for all) vs. relative views (economist views of trade-offs between short- (cash transfers) and long-term (education) objectives; cultural perspective that local norms supersede international human rights.

(Unit 1.3)

21
Q

What is a paradigm shift?

A

Overturning of previous world-view due to accumulation of new evidence.

e.g. market-led to state-led…
(Unit 1.3)

22
Q

What are the components in SP definitions?

ILO definition?

A

Different definitions by ILO, WB (2001, 2012), European communities, OECD-DAC, UNICEF, some with specific policy implications.

Components:
 Managing risk / vulnerability (All definitions)
 Help poorest meet basic needs /minimum standard (OECD-DAC 2009)
 Lifecycle support (ILO, EC2010)
 Poverty reduction / escape EC2010, WB 2012, OECD-DAC 2009
 Reduce inequalities / inequity (EC 2010, WB 2012)
 Private / public interventions (All public, WB, OECD-DAC, UNICEF private)

Eg ILO 2012 cited by WB 2012 and others: ‘… the set of public measures that a society provides for its members to protect them against economic and social distress that would be caused by the absence or a substantial reduction of income from work as a result of various contingencies (sickness, maternity, employment injury, unemployment, invalidity, old age, and death of the breadwinner), the provision of health care, and the provision of benefits for families with children.’

Unit 1.3

23
Q

Distinction in European Communities’ definition of SP (2010) between objectives:
social insurance
social assistance
inclusion efforts

A

Social insurance: offering protection against risk and adversity throughout life;

Social assistance: offering payments and in kind transfers to support and enable the poor;

Inclusion efforts: enhance the capability of the marginalised

Unit 3.3

24
Q

“Social transfers” vs. “Social insurance”

A

Social transfers (“social assistance”, “safety nets” (Grosh), “social security” or “welfare” (social assistance in OECD countries): NON-CONTRIBUTORY schemes to assist the poorest and reduce their risks, via transfers from wealthier; in cash, in kind, ad hoc or regular; temporary, long-term. Examples: financial, food, emergency food, pensions, public works, school feeding.

Social insurance:
CONTRIBUTORY schemes to reduce impact of shocks and lifecycle events (e.g. pension schemes, unemployment and sick payments, national health insurance).

1.3

25
Q

Consumption smoothing: examples

Unit 1.2 self-assessment

A

a) Borrowing a cup of sugar from a neighbour
c) Storing most of your maize harvest
d) Taking a microfinance loan (even if intended for profit-generating enterprise)

Income smoothing:
b) Vaccinating your chickens against disease

Asset smoothing:
e) Eating fewer meals when food prices rise