Unit 1 - Civil Rights Flashcards
Social, economic and political position of African Americans in different parts of the USA (1945)
Jim Crow laws:
- segregated facilities such as schools, parks and transport. This meant that black people had to drink from separate water foundations, eat at separate restaurants and use separate toilets. On buses they were required to sit at the back of the bus and give up their seats to white passengers of no seats were free.
- facilities for the black were under funded and poor quality
- many black people accept this inequality and felt that they couldn’t challenge it. People who did challenge it faces arrest, lost their jobs and faces violence from the Kkk
- in the North, segregation laws were less common and black peoples could legally live, work and vote. However, they had poor houses were overlooked for jobs and were prevented from joining trade unions.
Voting:
- black people were prevented from voting by a range of methods such as expensive poll taxes, intimidation and literacy tests
Education:
- education followed the principle of ‘separate but equal’
- on average southern states spent less than half as much on educating black children than white
Did the position of African Americans change or improve during the Second World War
In the years 1945-55 there were big changes in the position of African Americans… (Economic)
Because of the executive order of fair employment practices commission 1941 (this meant that industries in the war effort couldn’t discriminate)
- during the war many african Americans left the southern countryside to work in towns and cities in the south
- more than half a million migrated to the north to work in new factories (50% of African Americans lived in towns and cities)
- agriculture and factory work had the most demand
- North had higher pay than South for factory workers but not had prospect of working in higher skilled jobs
- those who migrated developed their own communities and cultural life. NAACP, churches, trade unions. (Social)
- over 1.2 millions black men joined the USA army -> segregated canteens, transport to battlefields and trained in different rural camps.
The attitudes of many white soldiers changed and fighting in the war boosted the self esteem of many black people. As a result, soldiers came back more determined to challenge racial injustice.
However…
- approx one million African Americans served in Second World War. they were motivated as they saw nazi racism be defeated in Europe.
- black soldiers returning from war were often treated with disrespect by white people - some even beaten for wearing uniforms or lynched
- many ex soldiers found it difficult to get a job, despite having served the country
- they did however benefit from the 1944 GI Bill of rights, which provided education grants for ex servicemen. Truman helped as he later expressed disgust to how they were being treated also (to secure the rights)
Politics…
- South: before the war less than 2 per cent of black population could vote. By 1945 approx 14 percent had been registered
The influence of Truman in 1947
Background:
-in private Truman was known to be quite racist to non whites however as a president he tried to improve the status of African Americans
- Truman became president in 1945 and he made civil rights an issue. This is probably because he wanted more votes
- however Truman knew it would be difficult as many members of congress were opposed to civil rights legislation. They even used tactics like filibustering to block civil rights legislation such as, the incident of the attempt to introduce the anti lynching lawn
Actions:
- in 1946 Truman signed an executive order announcing the creation of a presidential commission that would investigate the ways in which the rights of African Americans were being violated. As a result, in 1947 ‘to secure these rights’ was released
- this document states that racism was harmful to the country and not in keeping with what america should stand for… Freedom and equality. The report called for anti lynching laws, fair employment rights, voting rights and the abolishment of police brutality. It also expressed that racism has caused a negative effect of the economy as two sets of facilities have to be made which is costly, also less disposable income for black Americans which affects sales.
- over a million copies of the report were printed and it was widely discussed
- in 1948 Truman expressed all these views to congress
Result:
- congress was opposed to many of the reforms so nothing happened
- Truman remained in office till 1953 but later in his presidency his attention went to foreign affairs, Korean War.
- however, Truman used executive Orders to force change:
- executive order 9980 - equal opportunities
- executive order 10308 - defence contracts of firms which practised discrimination
- executive order 9981 - racial equality in armed forces
NAACP orgins and aims + CORE
- thurgood Marshall was a leading civil rights lawyer
- the NAACP was founded in 1909 by racial group activists. They aimed to challenge segregation in the courts and to secure legal equality for african Americans so that they couldn’t be treated different from white U.S. citizens. They did however allow white members aswell. Membership of the NAACP grew significantly during the Second World War, and the organisation had about 45000 members by 1945.
- they used the U.S. constitution to advance. For example, the tried to the government to honour the fourteenth and fifteenth amendments.
CORE:
- created in 1942.
- set up to oppose segregation
- they advocated direct action in contrast to the NAACP
e. g in 1947, core members undertook the journey of reconciliation in which black and white members travelled together on interstate buses in the south to show that the supreme court’s ruling on Morgan v Virginia wasn’t being enforced. The NAACP denounced this as they said it would lead to violence. Two core black members were sentenced to thirty days in jail and two of the white members were sentenced to three months in jail f.
Smith v Allwright - 1944
Lonnie smith wanted to vote in the democrats primary election in Texas, but was denied the charge to vote because he was black.
A primary election is where a political party’s members choose their candidate for an election. Primary elections were important in Texas because the Democratic Party was often the only party with a chance of winning, so the primary was the only meaningful election in the state.
Thurgood Marshall argues smith’s case and Supreme Court ruled that white only primary elections violated the fifteenth amendment
Morgan v Virginia 1946
Irene Morgan refused to give up her seat to a white passenger while travelling on an interstate bus in Virginia. She was fined
Marshall argues her case and the Supreme Court declared that segregation on interstate buses broke the fourteenth amendment
Sweatt v Painter 1950
Herman sweatt, a black student, was refused admission to the law school at the university of texas. The NAACP and Marshall room his case to the Supreme Court.
Before the case was heard a separate law school for african Americas was hurriedly built. However, the Supreme Court ruled that the new law school provided inferior education and poor facilities and that sweatt should be admitted to the university of Texas law schoolZ
De Jure
Legal change
De facto
Real change
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka
Oliver brown lives in Topeka, a town where more facilities, including schools, were segregated. He lives just a few blocks from an all-white school which refused to admit his 7 year old daughter Linda. As a results Linda has to travel across town on her own, crossing railways and busy streets to go to school.
Marshall and the NAACP decided to take the Browns case to the Supreme Court
Result:
- in May 1954 the Supreme Court made a judgment that segregated schools violated the fourteenth amendment. The court rules that all children Shiism have access to their local school, regardless of their colour. The court rejected the ‘separate but equal’ principle.
- earl warren played a key role in convincing the other Supreme Court members to agree
- the court rules that black schools were not equal to white schools, offering lower standards of education, which ensured that they would go on to be low skilled and have poorly paid jobs
However..
- de Jure change as many states simply refused to accept the ruling and progress was slow. Also, white parents wanted schools segregated and resisted the ruling. The court also didn’t set any timescale to ensure that it was being obeyed.
Opposition to brown v board of education
The white citizens’ council:
- a white supremist organisation that attracted membership among the leading members of white communities. The council organised a propaganda campaign in the south against the integration of education and pressures employers to sack civil rights activists. Formed in 1054, they had over 250,000 members
- the southern manifesto, written in 1956, rejected the supreme court’s ruling in brown c board of education and called for lawful opposition to desegregation. It was signed by 101 southern congress men
- by the end of 1956 six southern states had blocked any attempt of desegregated schoolsZ
- the 1950s saw a rise in members of the Kkk. They used terrorism and violence to attack civil rights campaigners.
- > murder of emmett till, 14, on 1955 who was beaten, shot and abducted for allegedly flirting with a white woman. This sparked media attention and people realised civil rights was worth fighting for. His murderers not convicted
Eisenhower:
President from 1953 to 1961. He believed that desegregation would come with time and didn’t want to use federal power to force desegregation. He also regretted appointing earl warren.
Background of Martin Luther King
- he grew up in a segregated society and went to black schools
- he came from a middle class family
- son of a baptist Minster and NAACP activist.
Aims:
- he was heavily influenced by his Christian faith and Gandhi. He had the ideology of love and forgiveness which lead him to wanting peaceful solutions to the problems in society. He didn’t want to use violence and hate.
- he did however recognise the importance of direct action through the Greensboro sit ins and bus boycott
Criticism:
- civil rights groups such as the SNCC thought he was too moderate and too willing to work with White prople. The more moderate NAACP Felt that king was too radical and endangered the civil rights movement.
E.g…
- king using children in Birmingham campaign was seen as too confrontational
- in 1967 when he spoke out on the Vietnamese war this was seen as unpopular
- some claimed that he was arrogant and self promoting
Montgomery bus boycott (1955-56)
- buses throughout the South were segregated. Normally, this meant that the front rows of the bus were reserved for white people whilst black people were forced to sit at the back
- NAACP turned to rosa parks, a long standing member, in order to challenge it
- parks refused to leave her seat and allow a white man to take her place. She was arrested and fined $14
- local buses were boycotted by most black people until desegregation were abolished. As a result 65% of bus revenue was lost. On the 21st of December the boycott desegregated
Result:
The boycott showed that black people could work together and achieve significant results
The highlighted the economic power of the Africans Americans
King emerged as a leading figure in the civil rights struggle
Greensboro sits ins 1960
- students organised the site in. The first one was on the 1st of February 1960 when 4 students sat down at white only seats and ordered coffee. when they weren’t served and asked to leave, they refused and stayed seated till the shore closed. More students joined and the protest was copied throughout the South. Roughly 70,009 students participated in the sit ins across the South
- in July 1869 Woolworth desegregated their lunch counters and within a year, over a hundred cities in the south had taken steps to desecrate their facilities.
Result:
The civil rights movement gained momentum. They showed that black people could work together
A new phase in peaceful protests
The students acted independent on both im the NAACP and kings sclc so some black people criticised him
Showed that non violent direct action could achieve quick and widespread change
Freedom rides 1961
ORGANISED BY CORE - they had achieved little since the journey of reconciliation in 1947 and were inspired so..
Freedom rides attempted to end segregation in interstate buses and other forms of travel
- in 1960 the supreme court ruled that segregation of interstate bus terminals was unconstitutional , so in 1961 core and sncc activists went on freedom rides to prove that it was de Jure not de facto change
- black people say on white only seats on the buses and attempted to use white only restaurants and facilities at bus terminals
As a result…
Buses were firebombed, it’s tyres slit and the rides were beaten. Bull Connor allowed the kk to attack the bus occupants
- the Kennedy administration ordered the bus companies to comply with Supreme Court rulings on the desecration of buses and bus terminals. The bus companies agreed and the freedom rides ended in September 1961
Effects
A triumph for direct action
Core faints respect and sncc participants
It was clear that Kennedy would be more supportive than Eisenhower
Albany Movement 1961-62
The SNCC members organised sit ins in segregated facilities in Albany that were still segregated despite supreme court’s ruling (boynton v Virginia)
boycotts were also used to put pressure of the city’s authorities, but they refused to compromise
King went to Albany and became heavily involved in the protests there. He ended up leading them which led to division as MLK realised that his tactics weren’t successful
Result
After a year of protests, the Albany movement had largely ended in failure. The interstate buses facilities were desegregated, but instead of integrating its facilities the city sold off its swimming pool and closed all its parks. Albany’s city officials also refused to desegregate its schools
Effect
Many civil rights activists questions MLK’s leadership
SNCC became increasing disillusioned with king’s methods of peaceful protest, and began to consider more violent tactics
He was critiqued for not uniting the SNCC and sclc to ensure they worked together effectively
The NAACP wanted no part in the Albany movement as they saw it as confrontational, they didn’t like the sclc and sncc’s tactics
- Laurie Pritchett studied tactics of blacks so when they went it would flop. She treated them w respect and this meant no media attention