Unit 1 Flashcards
List the property which passes outside of the will and intestacy rules
1) Joint property (held as beneficial joint tenants)
2) Insurance policies on trust (i..e, written on trust for the benefit of specified individuals)
3) Pension benefits of someone who has died in service
4) Trust property – I.e., where someone has a life interest, this dissolves – moreover, the trust property is dealt with according to the terms of the trust and not the deceased life tenant’s will.
What is the residuary gift?
Comprises all of the money / property left after the testator’s debst, expenses of dealing with the estate and other gifts have all been paid.
What happens if there is no residuary gift?
Rest of the estate which is not disposed of under the will goes through intestacy.
What are the 3 requirements for a valid will?
1) Capacity
2) Intention
3) Correct formalities under the Wills Act 1837.
What is the test for testamentary capacity?
1) Soundness of mind, memory and understanding
2) Testators must understand:
– Nature of their act and its broad effects (i.e, they are making a will which will have effect on their death)
AND
– Extent of their property (although not necessarily recollecting every individual item)
AND
– The moral claims they ought to consider (even if they decide to reject such claims and dispose of their property to other beneficiaries).
What is the general rule on the timing of capacity?
Testators must have capacity at the time they execute their wills.
What is the exception to this general rule?
Rule in Parker v Flegate – A will can be valid if the testator has capacity when they give instructions for the will even if they lose capacity by the time the will is executed.
What is the effect of the mental capacity act 2005?
Where a testator is mentally incapable of making a valid will, a statutory will may be made for them under the MCA 2005. (Only if it is in the testator’s best interests).
What is the golden rule?
If a testator lacks capacity, the will is void.
What should a solicitor do when preparing a will for a testator whose mental health is in doubt?
- Solicitor should ask a medical practitioner to provide a written report confirming that the testator has testamentary capacity and also ask the doctor to witness the will.
- Written evidence, including the solicitors’ own view, should be kept in a file note in the case that someone challenges the validity of the will after the testator’s death.
- Report witnessing by a medical practitioner in accordance with the ‘golden rule’ will find it difficult to be challenged on capacity grounds.
Who has the burden of proof?
General rule = It is for the person asserting that a will is valid to prove it.
When can executors rely on the presumption of capacity?
If the will is rational on its face and the testator showed no evidence of mental confusion before making the will.
In terms of intention, at the point of singing the will, what must the testator have?
1) General intention – I.e., intention to make A will
and
2) Specific intention – I.e., intention to make that specific will.
Does the rule in Parker v Felgate apply as an exception for intention?
Yes.
What is the presumption of knowledge and approval?
Where a testator has capacity and has read and executed the will – they are presumed to have requisite knowledge and approval.
What are the 3 exceptions to the presumption of knowledge and approval?
1) Testator blind / illiterate / not signing personally
2) Suspicious circumstances
3) Force, fear, fraud, undue influence and mistake
For exception 1) what are the requirements?
– Where testator is blind / illiterate or did not sign personally, the probate registry required evidence to prove knowledge and approval before they issue a grant of probate
– Good practice to include a statement at the end of the will stating that the will was read by the testator or read to them, who knew and approved its contents.
For exception 2) Suspicious circumstances, what are the requirements?
– E.g., will prepared by a beneficiary who stands to gain the most or who is a close relative of the beneficiary
– The person putting forward the will must remove the suspicion by proving knowledge and approval on part of the testator. I.e., the presumption of knowledge and approval does not apply and must be proven.
– Includes strange circumstances, e.g., where testator has extreme anxiety at the time of considering the will with their solicitor.
Should a solicitor accept instructions from a third party to draw up a will for a testator?
No. Testator should be interviewed in the absence of the third party.
What are the effects of exception 3) Force, fear, fraud, undue influence and mistake?
Where there is a testator with capacity and presumed knowledge and approval of contents of the will, anyone who wishes to challenge the will (or any part of it) must prove one or more of the following to prevent some or all of the will from being admitted to probate
What is force or fear?
Actual or threatened injury.
What is fraud?
Being misled by some pretence
What is undue influence?
(where a testator’s freedom of choice was overcome by intolerable pressure but their judgement remained unconvinced). Undue influence in the context of wills means coercion or duress. Persuasion stopping short of coercion is not undue influence:
– Necessary to prove undue influence in relation to a will. There is no presumption of undue influence & it has to be contested. This makes it very difficult for a person to challenge a will on this basis (they’ll need to collect evidence from family, friends and carers).
– Such a serious allegation that if they fail to substantiate their claims they will be penalised in costs.
What is mistake?
Presumption of knowledge and approval does not apply if all or part of the will was included by mistake.
– Words included without the knowledge and approval of the testator will be omitted from probate.
– Necessary to distinguish between actual mistake (i.e., absence of knowledge and approval) and misunderstanding as to the true legal meaning of words used in the will.
– Misunderstanding does not result in words being omitted.