Uncategorized Flashcards
Secondary considerations (3)
1)long time need, 2)failure of others, 3)*meets with great commercial success
KSR Rationales (ones I don’t know)
1) combination of elements in prior art to yield predictable results (at least two pieces of prior art someone of ordinary skill could assemble)
2) substitution of one known element for another to yield predictable results (by one or ordinary skill)
3) using known technique to improve similar devices in the same way (prior art includes comparable invention, someone of ordinary skill would be aware)
4) applying known technique to known device to yield predictable results
Two month rule
Activates free period for later of 1. 3 months, 2. first advisory action
Rights for first action vs. final rejection
first action: interview, amend affidavit
final rejection: no right to interview, amend, affidavit
Two most important automatic extension rules
1)available from 1-5 months, 2)5+ months not possible, 3)six month rule for official actions, 4)2 month deadline for filing appeal brief and response to notice of missing parts all have 5 month extensions
Situations where automatic extensions cannot be obtained
1) Office action states
2) Reply brief
3) Request for oral hearing
4) Responding to decision of the Board
5) Anything in an interference
6) Due dates in reexams
Cannot be extended even for cause
1) IDS
2) Statutory due dates
3) Issue fee
4) 3 month deadline to get refund as large entity
5) filing formal drawings when issue fee paid
Due dates calculated from
Mailing date of patent office, not date of receipt by attorney or agent
When shortened statutory period is there
Auto extension of up to 5 months can be requested, as long as doesn’t spill into 6 month limit
Filing a final rejection to a re-exam
Automatically extends the deadline for response by one month
Petition to revive abandoned
Must have 1)response to outstanding action or 2)continuation
Preliminary amendments
1) may be refused if unduly interfere with prep of Office Action and not filed within 3 months of filing date (not extendable)
2) on or after filing, but before action is issued,
3) filed with CPA if intention to file preliminary amendment in the application
Factors indicative of experimental purpose
see 2100-22 in binder
Steps to determining obviousness
1) Determine scope/contents prior art
2) Ascertain differences between prior art and claims in issue
3) Resolve level of ordinary skill in pertinent art
4) evaluate secondary considerations
35 USC 103 tenets to adhere to
1) claimed invention considered as a whole
2) references considered as a whole and must suggest
3) references viewed without benefit of impermissible hindsight vision
4) reasonable expectation of success
Where undue experimentation factors in MPEP?
2164.01a
Relative terminology - MPEP chapter
2173.05(b)
Basic pre AIA oaths and dec requirements
1) believe are true, original, first inventors
2) have reviewed and understand contents of application
3) acknowledge their duty to disclose known to be patentable
4) state citizenship, resident PO address
5) doesn’t have to be in English
Supplemental Oath
1) can be completed by fewer than all inventors
2) submitted when claims amended to include matter initially disclosed but not claimed
3) is a matter of right, even after allowance
4) no fee needed
Inventor’s Oath/Declaration 4 parts
see 600-7 and ADS parts (37 CFR 1.63)
Substitute statement requirements
600-8, 37 CFR 1.64
What must submit for notice of missing parts?
FOT
Where can essential material (claims and requirements for disclosure) be incorporated from?
1)issued US patent, 2)published application
NOT FROM:
1)foreign patent/application
2)publication
3)US patent which incorporates by ref essential material from another patent
Substitute spec
1) until payment issue fee
2) statement contains no new matter
3) marked-up copy (+’s -‘s)
4) not permitted in reissue/re-exam
IDS
1)Everyone associated with patent
2)All 102 acts, not just patent/printed pubs
Time I: within 3 months or before first Action, IDS only needed (or RCE first action)
Time II: Between First action and final allowance - statement or fee also
Time III: After final action, close of prosecution or allowance but BEFORE payment of issue fee - need statement and fee
*IDS in reissue should be there w/in 2 months of filing
IDS Statement
1) Each item from communication from foreign patent office less than 3 months from IDS
2) No item from foreign office and nothing from any w/duty to disclose more than 3 months before date of IDS
IDS Minimum Content
List of items
Copies of all information submitted (US not needed for published patents and apps)
*Translation not required, but concise explanation of anything not in English
What is deadline for Appeal Brief?
1) 2 months from when Notice of Appeal received at PTO
2) may be different from filing date by certificate of Notice of Appeal
3) Notice of Appeal doesn’t need to be signed/ID claims appealed
4) extendable up to 5 months of course
Requirements of Appeal Brief
1)ID real parties in interest (20 days if change) - otherwise assume listed inventors real party of interest
2)1 month to fix defective briefs
3)Related appeals/interferences (will assume none if not listed) must have:
I. same owner
II. known to appellant
III. relate to Board Decision
4)Claim summary
5)arguments to each rejection w/separate headings
6)appendix w/copy of claims appealed
*No new/non-admitted evidence
Amendment after filing appeal
1) may cancel claims that don’t affect other claims
2) rewrite dependent to independent claim format
affidavits before filing of appeal
1) need showing of good cause
2) overcome all outstanding rejections
3) must be submitted before filing the brief
What can do when get Examiner’s answer?
1) reopen prosecution
2) ask appeal be maintained and respond by filing of appeal brief
What can’t reply brief submit?
Amendments, Affidavits or declarations
Two options for new grounds of rejection in Examiner’s answer?
1) Can reopen prosecution, designate as “new ground” w/Petition and fee
2) Submit reply brief with appropriate argument, no petition needed
Oral Hearing
1) requested w/2 months of examiner’s answer, and usual fee paid
2) Deadline only extendable for cause
Reply brief
1) 2 months following Examiner’s answer
2) Extensions for cause
3) Board takes jurisdiction following filing or period for submission expires
4) forwarding fee due regardless of whether brief is filed
Upon remand, examiner may?
1) Submit Supplemental Examiner’s answer
2) Applicant may then reopen prosecution
What can applicant do if board issues new ground of rejection?
1) Submit amendment for reconsideration (can appeal decision)
2) have new rejection reconsidered
3) two month limit for rehearing or having new rejection designated as such
4) Can abandon app and file continuation at any time
5) withdraw appeal -abandon app
6) CAFC, District of Virginia
Affidavits after Notice of Appeal
1) Not admitted without showing of why not earlier presented
2) must overcome all outstanding rejections
Oral argument before Board of Appeals must:
1) Writing by applicant
2) Fee paid
Chart, 1200-5
1) Fee required for Notice of Appeal
2) Reply brief - 2 mos. as matter of right, forwarding fee
3) Request oral hearing - w/in 2 months + fee
4) Board decision - 2 mos. request rehearing
5) Appeal CAFC - 2 mos. + fee
6) Request for rehearing - 2 mos. + fee
MPEP 1812 dates
1) ISA report - 16 months from priority date
2) publication international app - 18 months from priority date
3) written opinion of ISA 30 months from priority date
* 4)Optional prelim. exam - demand from latter of 3 months of issuance of ISA, or 22 months from priority date
Requirements to enter national stage of US
1) Fee, 2)Translation, 3)Oath/Declaration (FOT)
- fee/application by 30 months of priority date
- oath can be made 1 month later w/fee
Elements of international apps
1)request
2)designation one contracting state
3)Name of applicant
4)spec drawing
5-6)Abstract/drawing can come later
MPEP 1821
1) Request has title of invention and ID’s applicant
2) Applicant - inventors and owners
3) Receiving office of international app must have at least one applicant that is a resident or national
4) No US - then can file without naming inventors/getting their signatures
Designation of contracting state
Requires no fee
Priority Claim
1) before 16 months after priority date, certified copy must be submitted to IB or RO
2) w/in 4 months of international filing date
3) PLTIA reprieve
Article 19 amendment to claims before international application publishes
1) one chance
2) IB and language of country
3) Must have received ISA/written opinion
Article 34 amendment
Until 22 months after priority date or 3 months after date of mailing of ISA search report/opinion whatever is later.
*Once in national stage - can amend in US as in normal prosecution
*Requirements for National Phase
1) by 30 months after filing/priority date (whatever is earlier)
2) copy international app + fee
* Can’t be submitted late/deadline extended
Oath translation can be given later w/surcharge
PCT app having IA filing date prior to 11/29/00
1) pre AIA 102e art, once patent based in I.A. has issued
2) FOT must all be received by patent office
3) DUSE rule after 11/29/00 (designate US, publish in English) - international filing date of IA
Term of PCT originated US patent
20 years from filing date of international application (not national stage date)
Minimum parts of PCT for US
EAR-PD 1)English description 2)at one application who is US national/resident 3)Request for treatment as int'l app 4)Priority claim 5)designation of one country - US *Spec, claim drawing Abstract can be submitted later
Tricky issues
1) fee/abstract can be submitted late
2) applicant means inventor/owner
3) priority claim cannot be added late
Post AIA PCT
1) Doesn’t have to publish in English
2) prior art as of its effective filing date
*Filing international app
No later than 12 mos. from priority date
PPH
1) same earliest filing date as intrn’l app
2) one claim allowed and all claims must sufficiently correspond
3) substantive examination of US app has not begun yet (notice missing parts/restriction doesn’t count)
Inter Partes Review
1)not patent owner
2)Cancel as unpatentable one or more claims
3)102 or 103, only prior patents and printed publications
4)Timeline:
9 months after grant of patent or termination of post grant review
5)If used for infringement can file IPR too, within one year of being served lawsuit
6)reasonable likelihood standard for at least one claim
7)estoppel with regards to that claim or any ground petitioner could have raised
Post grant review
1)not owner of patent
2)102, 101, 112, not failure to comply with best mode
3)”more likely than not” at least of the claims is unpatentable standard
4)infringment enacted w/in 3 months of patent grant, will not stay bc post grant review enstated
Timeline:
9 months after patent grant or issuance of reissue
5)Estoppel exists
Covered Business Methods
1) If party sued for infringement/charged with it
2) data processing for finance, but not technological innovations
IPR, PGR, CGM chart
pg. 15
Derivation
1) particularity, oath, substantial evidence
2) *Must be within 1 year of publication of claim
3) ID which app disputed & affidavit of communication of derived invention
4) can appeal to federal circuit