UN Flashcards
What is the UN?
- Promotes international cooperation to maintain international order - encouraging respect for HR and promoting social progress.
- Replaced the League of Nations with originally 51 members which grew to 193.
- Most largest, familiar, internationally recognised and powerful IGO in the world.
What is the UN Charter?
The constitution sets out UN powers within international law, members’ rights, how it carries out its key functions and the organs’ powers.
Secretariat
Key institutions of the UN
- Leads the civil service’ elected with a five year mandate.
- Provides studies, information and facilities needed by the UN and itacts as a public spokesperson and sets the UN agenda.
- Limited role but dependent on the geopolitics of the time - struggled to project a distinctive agenda during the Cold War between the USSR and USA.
The UN’s Security Council
- Executive committee.
- Issues binding resolutions in IL, economic sanctions and authorise military action - allows coordinated response to maintain peace and security
- Five permanent members (China, France, Russia, the UK and the USA) with veto powers to block any resolutions and ten non-permanent members elected by regional quotas (2 year terms).
Powers of UNSC in detail
Resolutions and vetos
- Resolutions = requires no veto from a permanent member and a 2/3 majority of permanent and non-p members.
- Veto = prevent issues of the League of Nations - recognises the importance of powerful countries in the UN and states can also abstain.
Powers of the UNSC in detail
The use of the veto
- Russia is the most frequent user, more than other states in the Cold War, followed by the USA as it wasn’t as isolated. Post-Cold War, the USA became the dominant hegemony and user.
- Since 2001, R/China used veto in a more multipolar world - problematic regarding response to the Syrian Conflict, where disagreements have seen frequent veteos.
- France and UK haven’t since 1980 - reflects that as less powerful members, they have fewer national interests at stake.
+ States may not place issues to vote if they knew a perm member would veto (e.g F/R vetoing a UK/US led resolution for the military invasion of Iraq).
Successes of UNSC in preventing and resolving conflict
- UN peacekeeping operations can be successful if they are well-resourced, has an effective mandate with achievable goals - organised over 69 globally.
- 1990 = mandated military action to expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait - following liberation in 1991, another resolution was passed to stop Saddam Hussein launching attacks upon the Iraqi Kurds,
- 2015 = agreed to extensive financial measures to stop the funding of terrorist organisations like al-Qaeda and the Islamic State.
- All permament members have remained within the UN and has maintained the UNSC as a forum for negotiating and diplomacy since 1945 - more effective than LON.
UNSC doesn’t prevent conflict
- Decisions of the permanent five is determined by realist self-interest.
- Unwilling to intervene in the Rwandan Genocide (1994), esp. the USA since the deaths of 18 US servicemen on a humanitarian mission to Somalia in 1993.
- Regardless of agreement on military intervention, UN has no military force and it must request forces from the member states as it has no military force.
- C/R’s geostrategic interest conflict with those of the US, UK and France - difficult to agree on resolution.
- 2013 = demanded the Syrian govt abandon its chemical weaponn programme but conflicted on whether this occured - Trump bombed alleged chemical weapon sites, it was condemned by R for violating Syrian sovereignty.
Further example of UNSC failures because of the Russia-Ukraine conflict
- Russia has assumed presidency of the UNSC in April 2023, despite Ukraine urging members to block the move and he had invaded Ukraine when he last held Pres. in 2022.
- Ironic because Russia’s Pres. Putin is subject to an international arrest warrant for alleged war crimes but is unable to be removed because of the UN Charter.
- Sept 2022 = vetoed a resolution calling for the reversal of its illegal annexation of four regions of Ukraine. Brazil, China, Gabon and India abstained.
Should the UNSC be reformed - yes
- Power of veto prevents accountability = difficult to achieve a consensus on military action, especially when perm members has a geostrategic interest (R supports Syria/China with Myanmar)
- France and the UK are no longer significant world powers - should be replaced or supplemented with others that emerged since 1945 (Brazil, Germany, India) as the balance of power has changed since WWII.
- More non-perm or perm members w/o veto could be a compromise to allow greater diversity without giving new members too much power. Not powerless - permanent members have to make efforts to persuade them to support the resolution.
- UNSC successfully reformed in 1965 - increased from six to 10 as having just 5 perm members challenges the principle of ‘sov equality’.
Should the UNSC be reformed? = no
- 5 perm veto members means a consensus is reached before action is taken, so the case for intervention is very strong (unlike Iraq 2003).
- Impossible for the permament members to agree on new permanent members, having the power of veto - likewise when agreeing new members (Pakistan likely to oppose India’’s membership).
- More countries having veto power would increase the likeliood of resolutions being vetoed - increased likelihood of being in a stalemate.
- Abolishing the veto, or restricting the ability of major powers to protect their national interest could see a return of LON’s - major powers withdrew as they had no facility to defend their national interests.
UN General Assembly
- Parliament - all 193 members have an equal voice and vote where NGOS are allowed to attend address meetings, further widening accessibility and inclusivity as a forum - annually meets at New York.
- Not binding resolutions and carries no force in international law - states can ignore these resolutions.
- No authorative voice on matters of international security.
Functions and powers of UNGA
- May resolve non-compulsory recommendations to states, or suggestions to the Security Council.
- Elects UNSC’s non-permanent members, the secretary-general (on UNSC’s recomendations).
- Considering and debating reports from ECOSOC and the ICJ.
- Decides the budget and elects ICJ judges.
Decision-making
- Challenging and time-consuming as all require a 2/3 majority - difficult to achieve concensus.
- Can take decisive action e.g UDHR in 1945, the foundational and guiding global HR framework, influencing laws. Recently approved the Millennium Declaration and the MDGs and the SDGs.
- Contraversial issues aren’t beyond the UNGA’s powers = granted Palestine non-member observer status in 2012 despite US/Israel opposition - allowed Palestine to sign the Rome Statute and joined the ICC - could investigate Israeli security forces in Palestine territory for alleged war crimes.
Strengths of the UNGA
- Only place where nations can engage in geniune global dialogue to highlight important global issues - UN resolutions carry significant global weight and authority as they represent world opinion, especially as equal voting rights means smaller member states’ rights are recognised.
- 2000 = endorsed the MDGs and in 2015 agreed to replace these with SDGs until 2030.
- 2005 = agreed to UN Responsibility to Protect - each states are responsible to protect its populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.
- 2018 = Presidents of small island states in the Caribbean, Pacific and Indian oceans urged the GA to fulfil the terms of the Paris Treaty as they were the first to suffer from climate change.
Limitations of the GA
- Unbinding resolutions - lacks coercive power.
- Voting equality - critics argue that it is irrational that a tiny city state like Monaco has as much influence as the USA.
- Nations can advance realist self-interest instead of seeking global consensus.
- World leaders can use the Ga to verbally abuse their enemies and try win global support for themselves - in 2018, P. Trump used his speech to attack Iran’s leadership for spreading ‘chaos, death and destruction’ whilst P. Rouhani then attacked Trump’s ‘weakness of intellect.
Economic and Social Councils
- Coordinates the UN’s commitment to economic, social and environmental development.
- GA elects 54 nations that sits for three year terms and seats are allocated to favour representation from the developing world (provides them with greater influence of how development is carried out).
- Monitors the work of the World Health Organisation, UNHCR and the World Food Programme.
Strengths of the ECOSOC
- The UN agencies plays important roles in encouraging global development:
- WHO has coordinated global efforts to eradicate polio and combat leprosy and recently COVID-19.
- World Food Programme is the biggest global humanitarian operation, delivering more than 15 billion emergency food rations each year.
- 2017 = 68.5M people displaced globally - the UNHCR plays the leading role in providing support and protection, coordinating assistance to refugees in conflict zones like the Middle East and Syria.
Weaknesses of the ECOSOC
- Lacks a policy-making function = critics claim it is primarily a global bureaucracy to which many different agencies report w/o a sense of overall vision.
- Although the developing world is given the most influence, the principle decision-makers are the World Bank, WTO and IMF - developing countries are less influential on these bodies.
- The agencies that report to ECOSOC and operate in the same country means there can be a costly overlapping of responsibility and accountability.
The International Court of Justice
- Established in 1945 - judicial arm which attempts to establish global respect for the rule of lawl.
- Arbitrates disputes between members and non-state actors and can request that the ICJ provides advisory opinions on contentious issues.
- To be successful, it’s necessary that states accept ICJ rulings - in 2013, Thailand accepted an ICJ ruling that the disputed Preah Vihear temple belonged to Cambodia and that Thai troops would have to withdraw (liberal example).
- 2019 = ICJ ruled that British control of the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean is illegal - UK govt responded that its decision was only advisory and the island was vital to Britain’s defence (realist example - difficult when larger states don’t recognise).
The Cold War (1945-91)
- Primary mandate was peacekeeping but military standoffs between the USSR/USA dominated -powerless to influence the conflict and only intervened in conflicts distant from the Cold War.
- Spread of decolonisation (1960s) = membership saw an influx of newly independent nations - 17 joined in 1960 alone, 16 from Africa.
- Oct 1971 = with US opposition and support of many Third World nations, the communist People’s Republic of China was given the Chinese seat on UNSC in place of the Republic of China that occupied Taiwan - seen as sign of waning US influence.
- With an increasing Third World presence and the failure of UN mediation in conflicts in the Middle East, Vietnam and Kashmir = increasingly shifted to its secondary goals of economic development and cultural exchange.
- By the 1970s, the UN budget of social and economic development was far greater than its peacekeeping budget.
Post-Cold War (1991-2001)
- 15 new independent states and USA hegemony as Russia was reluctant to oppose its former enemy in UNSC.
- Radical expansion of its peacekeeping duties, taking on more missions in ten years than it had in the previous four decades. Between 1988-2000, the number of adopted UNSC resolutions more than doubled, and the peacekeeping budget increased tenfold.
- Negotiated an end to the Salvadoran Civil War, launched a successful peacekeeping mission in Namibia, and oversaw democratic elections in post-apartheid South Africa and post-Khmer Rouge Cambodia. In 1991, it authorized a US-led coalition that repulsed the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.
Post-Cold War
Other interventions and were all successful?
- Though the UN Charter was written primarily to prevent aggression, in the early 1990s the UN faced a number of simultaneous, serious crises within Somalia, Haiti, Mozambique and the former Yugoslavia.
+ The UN mission in Somalia was widely viewed as a failure after US withdrawal following casualties in the Battle of Mogadishu. - In the late 1990s and 2000s, international interventions authorized took wider forms. E.G, the UN mission in the Sierra Leone War 1991-2002 was supplemented by the British Royal Marines and Afghanistan 2001 was overseen by NATO (ineffective as US withdrew troops in 2022).
War on Terror (2001-9)
- UN was largely sidelined - the US govt was determined to protect its ‘national interest’, having suffered in the 9/11 terror attacks - the most serious attack on US soil since Pearl Harbor.
- Authorised a UNSC Resolution = created the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and the UN was heavily involved in reconstruction/development in Afghanistan throughout the conflict - but ISAF is under US military command.
- Military action in Iraq 2003 was launched without a UNSC resolution, after France and Russia indicated they wouldn’t support the invasion.
- Some meaningful action - under Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, the UN intervened with peacekeepers in crises including the War in Darfur in Sudan and the Kivu Conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo and sent observers and chemical weapon inspectors to the Syrian Civil War.