UK Supreme Court Cases Flashcards
Regina v Jogge
• Year
• Ruling
2016
The precedent of being found guilty of the same crime under joint enterprise as the individual who committed it overturned, effectively rewritten the law on joint enterprise
Name UK Supreme Court cases that challenge the government’s power
- HM Treasury v Ahmed et al
- R v Commissioner of Police
- Tigre v Business Dept
- Miller and Dos Santos v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU
- Belhaj v Straw
Name UK Supreme Court cases that support the government’s power
- Nicklinson et al V Ministry of Justice
- Beghal v DPP
- MM Lebanon v Home Sec
HM Treasury v Ahmed et al
• Year
• Ruling
2010
Treasury had acted ultra vires in freezing assets of terrorist suspects
R v Commissioner of Police
• Year
• Ruling
2011
Ruled against retention of DNA from people not charged or acquitted of crimes
Tigre v Business Dept
• Year
• Ruling
2015
Ruled in favour of Zambian student (lived in UK 12 years but no indefinite leave to remain) to get student finance
Belhaj v Straw
• Year
• Ruling
2017
Allowed for the opening of cases against former For. Sec. and potentially MI6 and gov over rendition and torture
Miller and Do Santos v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU
• Year
• Ruling
2017
Ruled that parliament had to have a final say on the invoking of Article 50
Nicklinson et al V Ministry of Justice
• Year
• Ruling
2015
Ruling against citizens who wanted to attend a Swiss suicide clinic
Beghal v DPP
• Year
• Ruling
2015
Woman arguing her rights had been violated in her arrest at the airport under Terrorism Act ruled against
MM Lebanon v Home Sec
• Year
• Ruling
2017
UPholds that British citizens wanting to bring a non-EU spouse to the UK must earn over a threshold in income
Name two UK Supreme Court cases that involve Human Rights
- Hirst v United Kingdom - said prisoners being denied vote was a break of human rights
- A v Secretary of State for the Home Department - Belmarsh prisoners (tried in the House of Lords because SUpreme court not created yet)
R (Factortame Ltd) v Sec. of State for Transport
• Year
• Ruling
- 1990
- Ruled against the UK government, showing that the EU had precedent. Also established notion that Supreme Court could suspend Acts of Parliament if in violation of EU law