UK POL: D+P Flashcards
What is direct democracy
System of government with popular participation where people make the policy decisions. People therefore engage with politics on an ongoing basis
What is representative democracy?
Popular participation is indirect, the public do not exercise the power themselves but elect people who will rule on their behalf. Participation is limited, infrequent and brief, restricted to elections every few years.
What are advantages to direct democracy?
- Putting power in the hands of ordinary people increasing understanding + participation
- People obey the laws they make
- Development of citizens within democracy (only pure form)
- Less dependence on self-serving politicians and ensures a legitimate rule
- Increases trust and acceptability of gov.
What are disadvantages to direct democracy?
- Only achievable in relatively small communities (gov mass meetings?) examples are Switz + Slovakia
- Meetings (diplomacy) can’t happen when consulting millions each time
- Citizens cannot carry out their other duties while doing politics
- Citizens may not have time to educate themselves and therefore may be uninformed (e.g. Brexit referendum)
What are advantages to representative democracy
- Only form of democracy which can operate on large systems like UK/US
- Single choice, who to represent you
- Govern people using superior understanding and education
- A certain level of apathy is helpful in maintaining stability: The more passionate and involved citizens become the more disagreements happen (Brexit)
What are the disadvantages of representative democracy?
- Gulf between the government and people which leads to political apathy and powerlessness
- Voting is infrequent allowing people to “switch-off” from politics
- Government by politicians will never be representative of the people, only their ambitions
- 2019 63% people felt system was rigged for the rich and powerful
- Voter turnout is low in local elections: 36% 2004, 25% 2019 and general elections are not as high as they should be to ensure democracy (In the last 30 years highest turnout was 77% in 1992)
Should referendums be used more frequently in the UK? (YES)
- There is support for wider use. 55% of the public agreed important questions should be put to it
- If citizens can initiate referendums this will legitimise gov response + participation
- Direct democracy only pure form of democracy, with more frequent use people will become more educated
Should referendums be used more frequently in the UK? (NO)
- The government will only call referendums for support when they think they’ll win
- People are not informed enough to make the choice alone (+misinformation)
- Referendums in the UK are not constitutionally binding (+constitution is not binding either)
- Disagreements in the result lead to polarisation
Should the process for recalling MPs be easier? (YES)
- Constituents could recall MPs when they fail to deliver on their promises, increasing accountability and trust. Fiona Onasanya suspended from HoC for lying about speeding and criminal conviction: first use of 2015 Recall Act
Should the process for recalling MPs be easier? (no)
- Critics of the 2015 Recall of MPs Act say that it would mean MPs cannot think for themselves and just become mouthpieces (delegate model). Without independence they cannot be held accountable
Argument for devolved governments in a healthy democracy
- Everyone has a say to legitimised government- However, it is inefficient + Welsh turnout 30% no demand for devolved body
- Balance of powers, regions having specific catered focuses (e.g. Scottish health + schools)
Arguments for wide range of political parties and pressure groups in democracy
- Everyone is well represented and can hold the majority and politicians to account
- Widens voter choice and increases participation
- More competition leads to better policy with less loopholes
- Iron triangles and the control of the rich would have less efficiency in a government where there is third party interference and debate
Argument for/against free and fair elections in democracy
- Legitimate governments, giving representation with popular support
- Many may not be informed as to what they are voting for + can lead to decreased participation in areas outside of voting (pressure groups, protests and debates)
Arguments for/against an Independent Judiciary
- Hold the executive to account so politicians can perpetuate self-interest
- Judicial activism may lead to government inefficiency
- Checks and balances on the executive
- On the other hand, they are not elected and cannot be politicians/linked to politicians as they would then not be independent
Arguments for/against free media
- Closes gap between public and government
- Hold government to account independently
- Increases awareness and engagement
- However, can be misleading or exaggerating news. Polarisation and media manipulation by the rich (e.g. Rupert Murdock)
- Some parties have affiliation with specific newspapers (can instruct them, e.g. Daily Mail allies with the conservative party and works with them)