UE 8: Moral Hazard in Teams Flashcards
What are the components of Holmström (1982)?
- A team 0f > 2 members
- Members take actions, ai, that cannot be directly observed (strategy set)
- Actions imply private (non-monetary) costs vi, which are differentiable, strictly convex, and increasing
- Combinations of actions produce a joint monetary outcome, x, that must be allocated, which is differentiable, concave, and strictly increasing
- A sharing function determines the share, si, of the output
What is the question of Holmström (1982)?
Can joint output 𝑥 be allocated so that there exists a Pareto optimal Nash equilibrium of the non-cooperative game?
What would be the implication of a Pareto optimal Nash equilibrium in Holmström (1982)?
That 𝑠′(𝑥(𝑎∗)) = 1
- The derivative of the sharing function of the outcome given an optimal action is 1
Can a Nash EQ exist in Holmström (1982)?
No, as 𝑠′(𝑥(𝑎∗)) = 1 is matched with the fact that the addition of all the derivatives of the sharing function must also be 1 via the budget constraint, which is a contradiction.
It’s only possible if the balanced budget constraint is weakened.