U4AO1 - Law-Makers - Parliament and Constitution Flashcards
Define House of Representatives
The lower house of the Commonwealth Parliament, which is comprised of 151 MPs representing electorates across Australia
Role of House of Representatives x5
- Initate new legislation
- Initate money bills
- Represent the people in law-making
- Review legislation and propose amendments
- Scrutinise legislation
Define the Senate
The upper house of the Commonwealth Parliament, which is comprised of 76 senators who represent the six states and two territories across Australia.
Role of the Senate x3
- Scrutinise bills
- Act as a states’ house
- Initiate bills
Role of the Crown in Commonwealth Law-making x3
- Grant royal assent
- Suggest ammendments to legislation after passing both houses (doesn’t happen)
- Summon the Executive Council
Define Legislative Assembly
The lower house of the Victorian Parliament, which is comprised of 88 members of parliament representing the electoral districts across Victoria.
Role of Legislative Assembly x5
- Initate new legislation
- Initate money bills
- Represent the people in law-making
- Review legislation and propose amendments
- Scrutinise legislation
Define Legislative Council
The upper house of the Victorian Parliament which is comprised of 40 members of Parliament who represent eight regions across Victoria.
Role of Legislative Council x2
- Scrutinise legislation
- Initiate legislation
Role of Crown in Victorian Law-making x3
- Grant royal assent
- Act as a Head of State
- Summon the Executive Council
Define Exclusive Powers
Law-making powers granted only to the Commonwealth Parliament by s 51 and s 52 of the Australian Constitution.
Exclusive Power examples x3
- Customs/border protection
- Armed forces
- Currency
Define Concurrent powers
Law-making powers granted to both the Commonwealth and state parliaments, found in s 51
Concurrent powers examples x3
- Marriage and divorce
- Taxation
- Banking
Define Residual power
Law-making powers that are not granted to the Commonwealth Parliament in the Australian Constitution and therefore belong to the state parliaments
Residual power example x3
- Education
- Criminal law
- Police
Quote Section 109 of the Constitution
‘When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.’
Significance of s109 x4
- Resolves inconsistencies
- Restricts law-making power of the states
- Requires case to be brought to High Court to be considered invalid (not automatic)
- Allows previously invalid state laws to come into force if Commonwealth law is changed
Facts of Tassie Dams Case
Tasmania (TAS) wanted to dam the Franklin River, but the Commonwealth opposed this, and as they were a signatory of the World Hertiage Protection treaty, they were able to pass legislation under s 51 (xxix) the External Affairs power to declare the Franklin River heritage protected. After TAS brought this case to the High Court, the Tas Dams case was ruled in favour of the Commonwealth.
Significance of Tas dams case (Cwth & state)
Cwth:
- Broadened power due to ability to make residual areas of law (such as environmental protection) concurrent, and overrule state legislation due to s 109
- Must enter legitmate treaties
- Subject to Constitutional limitations (express powers)
State:
- Narrowed as residual areas of power can become concurrent, and subject to s 109
How does the bicameral structure of parliament affect their ability to make laws (both houses)
- Limited by amount of sitting days in parliament (laws can only be passed during sitting days)
- Limited by both houses + GG having to debate/vote/give amendments for a bill
In the Senate, the cross bench usually holds what?
The balance of power
Strenghts of bicameral structure on ability of parliament to make laws x4
- Stops parliament from passing laws solely for political gain
- All bills are reviewed and debated
- Govt. majority in senate leads to quick bills being passed, overcoming sitting day challenge
- Govt. minority in senate leads to more review, improving the quality of law-making