U3 AOS1 The Australian Criminal Justice System (4) Flashcards
Cross-examination
The process of questioning witnesses called by the prosecution, to test the accuracy and reliability of the evidence they present in court.
Legal practitioner
An individual with legal training, qualified to give evidence and appeal in court. Generally, a solicitor prepares legal documentation (e.g., the hand-up brief presented during a committal proceeding) and a barrister is responsible for representing a party in a trial (e.g., making legal arguments etc).
Responsibilities of the prosecution in the opening and closing address
When the barrister outlines their case at the beginning (opening address) and end (closing address) of the trial this includes a summary of the evidence they will present/have presented, the facts they want the court to accept as true based on this evidence, and a summary of legal arguments as to why the accused is guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
Responsibilities of the prosecution in the presentation of the case to a judge and jury
The responsibility of the prosecution to present all relevant evidence, by calling witnesses for examination in front of the judge and jury throughout the trial. This means asking questions of the witnesses they call, with witnesses’ responses informing the court as to the facts in the dispute.
Responsibilities of the defence in the opening and closing address
Accused person’s barrister will summarise legal arguments for why accused is not guilty (raising lawful defences) and/or challenge whether the prosecution has proven the accused person is guilty beyond reasonable doubt (which may include summarising any doubts raised during the trial about the accuracy of the evidence presented by prosecution witnesses).
Responsibilities of the defence in the presentation of the case to a judge and jury
The accused person’s legal representative will cross examine witnesses called by the prosecution, to test the accuracy and reliability of the evidence they present in court.
List three responsibilities that are similar to the prosecution and the defence
All legal practitioners have a duty to assist the court, by raising all relevant legal principles that the court may need to consider in reaching a verdict (even if such legal principles are in conflict with their client’s interests);
All legal practitioners have a duty not to mislead the court and a duty to act with courtesy towards the court and all witnesses;
All legal representatives advise the judge as to which legal principles should be presented to the jury in the judge’s final directions;
List the purposes of sanctions as protected in section 5 of the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic)
Punishment, deterrence (i.e., specific and general), rehabilitation, denunciation, and protection.
What is the purpose of punishment as a sanction?
A sanction imposed that is more severe to ensures offenders ‘pay’ for the impact their crimes have had on victims of crime and or society as a whole therefore sentencing judges use the totality and proportionality principles.
The totality principle
Requires a sentencing judge to impose a sentence that is should be just appropriate to reflect the entire or overall impact of an offender’s crimes where the offender has been convicted of a number of crimes.
The proportionality principle
A sentence should reflect the gravity of the offender’s criminal behaviour that is, ‘how much’ someone should be punished should more or less equate to ‘how much’ detriment that offender’s crimes have caused.
Sanctions
A penalty imposed by a court after an accused person is found guilty on an offence or pleads guilty to an offence.
The principle of parsimony
A sentencing judge must take the five purposes set out in the Sentencing Act into consideration when imposing a sentence but must not impose a sentence that is more severe than necessary to achieve the purpose of the sentence imposed.
What is the purpose of deterrence as a sanction?
A means to ‘make an example’ of the offender in an effort to sway the offender or possible future offenders away from committing similar crimes through the imposition of a more severe criminal sanction that of which will usually be accompanied by comments from the court stating that the longer sanction is designed to specifically and/or generally discourage such offending.
Specific deterrence
Occurs when the offender themselves is discouraged from committing offences of the same or similar character through the provision of a sanction.