U3 AOS1 A SAC1 Flashcards
define summary offences
minor criminal offences
usually heard in the magistrates’ court
do not require a jury
mainly found in the summary offences act 1966 (vic)
maximum imprisonment
2 years for a single offence
5 years for multiple offences
examples include disorderly conduct, drink driving and minor assaults
define indictable offences
serious criminal offences
usually heard in the county court or the supreme court
usually require a judge and jury
a jury is used to determine guilt if the accused pleads not guilty
mainly found in the crimes act 1958 (vic)
examples include rape, murder, fraud and drug offences
define committal proceedings
the pre-trial hearings and processes held in the magistrates’ court for indictable offences
an accused person is charged with an indictable offence and pleads not guilty
no committal proceedings for summary offences
committal proceedings involves several stages before reaching the final part, the committal hearing
define committal hearing
where the magistrate will decide whether there is sufficient evidence to support a conviction for the offence charged at trial
if there is enough evidence
the accused is committed to stand trial and the case is transferred to a higher court that will hear the case
if there is not enough evidence
the accused is discharged and allowed to go free
list the purposes for committal proceedings
ensuring that cases where there is inadequate evidence do not go to trial
finding out whether the accused plans to plead guilty or not guilty
ensuring a fair trial by making sure the prosecution’s case is disclosed to the accused
giving the accused the opportunity to put forward a case at an early stage and possibly cross examine witnesses
define indictable offences heard summarily
serious criminal offences that can be heard in the magistrates’ court as if they were minor criminal offences
mainly found in schedule 2 of the criminal procedure act 2009 (vic)
list the eligibility criteria for an indictable offence to be heard summarily
the accused agrees to it
why?
- quicker than a trial in the county court or supreme court
- the sentence that a magistrate can hand down is far less than if it was heard as an indictable offence
- cheaper to have a case heard in the magistrates’ court
the court agrees it is appropriate
the maximum sentence for the crime is less than 10 years
define the burden of proof
the obligation (or responsibility) of a party to prove the facts of a case
usually rests with the party who initiates the action
in a criminal case, the prosecution holds the burden of proof
outline when the burden of proof can be reversed
if an accused pleads a defence such as self-defence or mental impairment, then they must prove it
‘prove it’ means to provide sufficient evidence to show that the accused reacted in response to another person’s actions
define the standard of proof
the degree or extent to which a case must be proved in court
level of certainty or strength of evidence required
dictates how much evidence is needed to prove a person guilty in court
state and outline the standard of proof in a criminal case
in a criminal case, the standard of proof is beyond reasonable doubt
beyond reasonable doubt is the highest standard of proof, when once the evidence has been presented there must be no doubt in a juror’s mind when they decide on a verdict (if it’s strong enough)
state the similarities and differences between burden of proof and standard of proof
similarities
assist in upholding the presumption of innocence for the accused
both used to determine the guilt
both relate to the party who initiates the case
differences
defintion of burden of proof and standard of proof
burden of proof can be reversed whereas the standard of proof is only on the prosecution
define the presumption of innocence
any person that has been accused of a crime is presumed innocent until they have been found guilty in a court of law
state the ways to uphold the presumption of innocence
burden of proof on the prosecution rather than the accused
imposing a high standard of evidence (standard of proof) on the prosecution rather than the accused
the use of the bail system to allow an accused their liberty prior to the court date
the right to silence during questioning and the trial
not allowing a person’s prior convictions to be revealed until their sentencing (after they have been found guilty)
state the act that the presumption of innocence is under
common law right
charter of human rights and responsibilities act 2006 (vic)