U1 Overring Legal Obligations - Equality Act Flashcards

1
Q

Who do the overriding obligations apply to?

A

All legal proffesionals, irrespective of if they are regulated or not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 2 overriding obligations?

A
  1. The Equality Act 2010
  2. Anti-Money Laundering Legislation (Proceeds of crime act 2002)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How many protected characteristics are there as per the Equality Act of 2010?

A

9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 9 Protected Characteristics of the Equality Act of 2010?

A
  1. Age
  2. Disability
  3. Gender Reassignment
  4. Marriage / Civil Partnerships
  5. Pregnancy and Maternity
  6. Race
  7. Religion or Beliefs
  8. Sex
  9. Sexual Orientation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 6 prohbited conducts arrising from the equality act of 2010?

A
  1. Direct Discrimination
  2. Indrect Discrimnation
  3. Discrimination Arrising From Disability
  4. Harassement
  5. Victimisation
  6. Not complying with the duty to make resonable adjustments (direct discrmination)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 3 elements for Direct Discrimination for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010?

A

They were treated less favourably then someone else because of their protected characteristic.

  1. The victim must show that another person would have been treated differently
  2. Their treatment was less favourable
  3. The reason for the less favourable treatment was because of their protected characteristic.

Direct discrimination can also be constituted by failing to make reasonable adjustments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is indrect discrimination?

Give an example

A

When a policy, practice, or rule applies generally BUT has the effect of adversley impacting those who share a protected characteristic.

For Example: a company may have a policy that all employees must be able to travel at very short notice. Whilst this applies generally to all employees, it is likely to adversely impact female employees as they are more likely to have childcare responsibilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When may Indirect Discrimination be justified?

A

when the discrimination is a proportionate way of achieving a legitimate aim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the diffrence in grounds that need establishing for Direct Discrination v Discrimnation arrising from a disability?

A

Unlike direct discrimination, the claimant is not required to compare their treatment with others.

They just need to show they was treated less favourably because of their disability, or something arrising from their disability?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can discriination arising from disability be jusified?

A

May be justified when the discrimination is a proportionate way of achieving a legitimate aim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What 2 prohbited conducts can be justified in accordance with the equality act of 2010?

A
  1. Indrect Discrimnation
  2. Discrimination arrising from a disability

May be justified when the discrimination is a proportionate way of achieving a legitimate aim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is harrasment for the purposes of the equality act 2010?

How does this apply to sexual harrasment?

A

Harassment is where:

  1. someone is subject to unwanted conduct that relates to certain protected characteristics (all but marriage / civil partnership) and
  2. The unwanted conduct:

a) Violated the victims dignity

b) or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offence environment for that person.

Sexual Harassment

The above also applies to sexual harassment if the victim is treated less favourably than they would have been treated because they rejected or submitted to the unwanted conduct even without a protected characteristic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Victimisation for the purposes of the equality act?

A

Where a person is subject to a detriment (disadvantage) because it is believed the person has done, or will do, a protected act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a protected act for the purposes of victimisation under the equality act?

A

Protected Acts:

  1. Bring Proceedings under the Equality Act
  2. Give evidence or information in proceedings brought under the equality act
  3. Do anything that is related to the Provisions of the Equality Act
  4. Alleging that another person has done something in breach of the quality Act

NB: It does not need to be shown the victim has a protected characteristic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the positive obligation of the equality act?

A

The act provides a duty to make reasonable adjustments.

Not making reasonable adjustments constitutes direct discrimination.

Reasonable steps must be taken to prevent a disabled person being put at a SUBSTANTIAL DISADVANTAGE because of:

  1. A provision, criterion, or practice (i.e the practice of only providing information in a standard format)
  2. A physical feature (i.e not having wheel chair access)
  3. Lack of provision of an auxiliary aid (Specalist equipement)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are solicitors obligations as service providers in accordance with the equality act 2010?

A

All service providers are prohibited from treating service users in certain ways.

Therefore, a solicitor must not:

  1. Discriminate against or victimise a prospective client in respect of terms of service
  2. Discriminate or victimise a client by terminating services provided to a client / perspective client
  3. Discriminate against or victimise a client by subjecting the client to any other detriment
  4. Harass a client / prospective client.
17
Q

Is the duty to make reasonable adjustments a proactive duty?

A

Yes, Firms must adopt a proactive rather than restrictive approach, this means they should take reasonable steps regardless of whether a disabled client has made a complaint. What is reasonable will have regard to factors such as cost and resources of the firm.

18
Q

What is the diffrence in the duty to make reasonable adjustments for clients v employees.

A

For clients, the firm must take a proactive approach. For example, they should wait for a disabled person to complain there is no wheel chair acsess, they should ensure in the first place they have made reasonable adjustments.

For employees, firms are only required to make adjustments when they know, or are ought to know, that the employee is disabled and is likley to suffer a disadvantage.

19
Q

Can employeers be vicariously liable for their employees breach of the equality act?

A

Employers can be liable for their employees breaches of the equality act, even if they was unaware of the conduct.

However, they may escape liability if they can show they took reasonable steps to prevent such behaviour (such as providing training)

20
Q

What are the unlawful acts frims are not allowed to do when hiring with regards to the equality act?

A

Firms cannot discriminate or victimise in respect of:

  1. Recruitment arrangements
  2. declining to offer employment
  3. Terms of employment

For example, only higher Ing people younger than 40

21
Q

What are the unlawful act frims are not allowed to do to their employees with regard to the equality act 2010?

A

Firms must not subject an employee to harassment and must not discriminate against or victimise an employee:

  1. as to their terms of employment
  2. in the way it affords access to opportunities for promotion, transfer or training, or for receiving any other benefit, facility or service.
  3. By dismissing the employee or
  4. By subjecting the employee to any detriment.
22
Q

What is postive action? When is it allowed?

A

(Reverse discrimination as i call it)

Firms may treat an employee or prospective employee more favourable because of their protected characteristic.

This is only lawful where the firm reasonably believes that persons who share a protected characteristic:

  1. Suffer a disadvantage connected to the characteristic, or
  2. have different needs, or
  3. are disproportionately underrepresented in respect of a particular activity,

And the positive action is proportionate way of redressing the situation.

This can apply in employment, but can only be lawful if the candidate with the protected characteristic is as suitable for the role as others. Positive action can only be used where there is a tierbreak situation between 2 equally suitable candidates.