Types of observation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is a structured observation?

A
  • may occur in a natural or laboratory setting
    -often the observer intervenes in order to cause an event to occur
  • records behaviours that are difficult to observe in naturalistic setting
    -focus of observation is determined beforehand
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the advantages of a structured observation?

A

-high in reliability - the observation is manageable and clear, therefore it is easier to replicate to test for consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the disadvantages of a structured observation?

A
  • lack ecological validity - observation is created by the researcher who may manipulate the iv, if done in a lab the behaviour cannot be applied to a real life setting.
    -lack valid findings - fully plan observation before hand, predetermined idea of results, results may not be 100% accurate, subjective
  • unethical - situation set up by researcher, therefore may be distressing to participants.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a naturalistic observation?

A
  • observing subjects in their natural environment
  • looks at behaviour as it occurs in natural setting with no attempts at intervention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the advantages of a naturalistic observation?

A
  • ethical - lets researchers see natural behaviours
  • ecologically valid - set in a natural day to day environment (park, shopping), less chance of demand characteristics ( acting how you think you should)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the disadvantages of a naturalistic observation?

A
  • not reliable - cant control behaviours, may not be able to manipulate iv, distractions, not controlled, harder to replicate and test for consistency.
    -expensive/time consuming - wait for people to appaer and behaviour to naturally occur
  • low validity/objectivity - small sample sizes = more anomalies= less validity, different observers may note down different behaviours, biased
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a covert observation?

A
  • identity of the researcher, nature of research project, and the fact the partcipants are being observed are concealed from those being studied.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the advantages of a covert observation?

A
  • valid - participants unaware of observation and will have natural behaviour (lack of demand characteristics), reduces inaccuracy
  • allows researchers to study things that cannot be studied in other ways - studying unusual groups such as gangs and cults, not possible in overt observations because the researcher would not have access to group.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the disadvantages of a covert observation?

A
  • unethical - don’t have right to withdraw, cannot consent, observation poses some ethical issues and deception
  • validity reduced - practical issues such as hiding that you’re taking notes, may have to take notes after study, some findings may be missed, not as accurate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is an overt observation?

A
  • researcher being open about their intentions in the field and ensuring all members of the social group are aware of what is happening.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the advantages of an overt observation?

A

-no ethical issues - participants have given consent, aware of observation and purpose of observation, no deception, right to withdraw
- high validity - observer is in open, no hiding, more in depth accurate view of behaviour being studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the disadvantages of an overt observation?

A
  • lack validity - the participants know they are being observed so behaviour may not be accurate, participants may change behaviour for observation, more likely to show demand characteristics
    -results not reliable - participants are told about observation and may prepare, results will be inaccurate.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a participant observation?

A
  • the observer participates in ongoing activities and records observations, the observer is a player in the observation and actually takes on the role of being
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the advantages of a participant observation?

A

-high validity- researcher gets an insider viewpoint and better information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the disadvantages of a participant observation?

A
  • low validity - events are interpreted through single observers eyes, who may be emotionally involved in observation, more likely to be bias/objective
  • low validity - easy to influence other peoples behaviour, raising problem of reactivity and unnatural behaviour, conclusions will be less credible
  • unethical - deception as people don’t know they are being observed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a non-participant observation?

A
  • observer does not participate in activities being observed, observer has a distant and separate role, watches and records events
17
Q

What are the advantages of a non-participant observation?

A
  • high in validity - much easier to record data because the observer is not involved in situation, more accurate information of what happened.
  • high validity - researcher does not get involved with participants, more objectivity, less bias
    -high validity - only watch the observation from the side lines, behaviour is more accurate, credible conclusions
18
Q

What are the disadvantages of a non-participant observation?

A
  • low validity - the researcher isn’t taking part in the experience and may not fully understand the behaviour being witnessed makes conclusions less credible.