TX Crim. Pro. & Evidence Flashcards
Contacts between police and citizens:
Voluntary Encounters - No 4th Amendment implications Temporary Detentions - Require reasonable suspicion that one has committed or is about to commit an offense (articulable explanation of why officer thinks suspect might be armed for pat down of outer clothing) Arrests - Must be based on probable cause with or without a warrant
Arrests
Actual restraint or custody of an individual Test is whehther they would have felt free to decline the officer’s request or terminate the contact. Seizure requires an application of physical force or submission to showing of authority
2 Kinds of Arrest
Warantless and under warrant
Probable Cause
Exists when officer has reasonably trustworthy info that would lead reasonable person to believe an offense has been or is being committed May be based on info from citizen, personal knowledge, or a reliable informant (not solely on uncorroborated anonymous tip) Probable cause = valid search
Illegal Arrests
No pretextual arrests. If officer has probable cause, subjective intent is irrelevant. Illegal arrest does not require reversal of conviction but resulting evidence is generally subject to exclusion If defendant is arrested without probable cause, given Miranda warnings, and voluntarily confesses, confession is inadmissible as product of illegal arrest
Warrantless Arrest
Probable cause required In TX, warrantless arrest is unreasonable unless authorized by statute: 1. Presence or view of officer 2. Suspicious places or circumstances 3. Violation of protective order 4. Preventing consequences of theft 5. Presence or view of magistrate 6. Assaults 7. Fleeing felons 8. Fugitives from another state 9. Interfering with emergency calls 10. Suspect makes admissible confession of felony
Arrests Under Warrant
Probable cause required Warrant required for entry into private premises unless consent or exigent circumstances Officers must knock before forcible entry unless futile, dangerous, or likely to result in destruction of evidence Violation of knock requirement does not require suppression of evidence Warrant extends to entire state and any peace officer (unless issued by mayor)
Requirements for Arrest Warrant
- Written order by magistrate issued in the name of “The State of TX” 2. Name or reasonable description of offender 3. Nature of offense 4. Signed and dated by magistrate, and 5. Office of magistrate stated
Time, Force, and Notice Connected with Arrest
a. Arrest may be at any time b. Only reasonable force allowed c. Notice of authority and purpose required prior to arrest at residence d. After proper notice, police may break down door e. Accused must be informed of authority under which arrest is made, but…. f. Officer not required to have actual possession of warrant
Initial Appearance Before Magistrate
- After arrest, must be taken before magistrate “without unnecessary delay” (no later than 48 hours) 2. This is “Initial Appearance” 3. Magistrate shall inform D of: a. charges b. Right to counsel c. Miranda rights, including right to terminate interview at any time d. Right to examining trial (only pre-indictment felonies) 4. Set bail if authorized by law
Search & Seizure
Search - Governmental activity that invades subjective reasonable expectation of privacy Seizure (person) - Detention of person where person is not “free to leave” based on a reasonable-innocent person standard, not the subjective intent or belief of either the officer or D Seizure (property) - Significant governmental intrusion into a person’s right of possession
Search & Seizure: Standards
- Arrest ALWAYS constitutes seizure of person 2. Investigative detention/stop is seizure, consensual encounters are not 3. Investigative detention/stop requires reasonable suspicion 4. 4A only applies to government officials 5. Only unreasonable seizures violate 4A
Searches Under Warrant
Search warrant orders peace officer to search for property, seize it, and return to magistrate Procedure: 1. Sworn affidavit presented to magistrate 2. Magistrate determines whether probable cause exists under totality of circumstances Search warrant may order arrest of person if affidavit establishes probable cause the person has committed a crime Same knock and announce requirement as arrest warrant
Probable Cause for Search Warrant Must Show:
- Specific offense committed 2. Property sought is evidence of offense 3. Property is at location to be searched
Four Corners Rule
Court issuing search warrant can only rely on info contained in affidavit Affidavit becomes public info when warrant executed
Contents of Search Warrant
- Runs in the name of “The State of TX” 2. ID’s thing to be sized and property to be searched 3. Commands peace officer to conduct search; and 4. Dated and signed by magistrate and name also typed
Execution of Search Warrant
Without delay, but in no case longer than 3 days of issuance (exclusive of issued and executed dates) Copy must be given to or left for owner
TX Statutory Good-Faith Exception
When magistrate has issued defective warrant based on probable cause, if executing officer objectively believes in good faith the warrant is valid, evidence is admissible
Test for Unreasonableness of Search and Seizure
Court balances the degree of intrusion into person’s privacy against the legitimate reasons for the intrusion
Exceptions to Search Warrant Requirement
- Consent 2. Search incident to lawful arrest 3. Auto exception 4. Inventory searches 5. Exigent circumstances 6. Plain view exception 7. Border searches 8. Community caretaking function 9. Recovery of abandoned property 10. Terry pat-down
4th Amendment Standing Requirements
- D asserts his 4A rights were violated 2. Evidence obtained is intended to be used against him in criminal trial; and 3. D is victim of alleged illegal search or seizure Test is whether D has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched or property seized Passenger in vehicle generally lack standing to challenge search of glove compartment or area beneath passenger seat, but does have standing to challenge a search of his person or personal property in his possession
Circumstances that Diminish Reasonable Expectation of Privacy
- Penal institutions 2. Public schools 3. Administrative searches (e.g., boats) 4. Probationers’ homes
Confessions
Bedrock principal = voluntariness Voluntariness determined by totality of circumstances surrounding the statement (look to age of accused, length of interrogation, and whether force, threats, or deception were used) Burden to show voluntariness on state Involuntary statements always inadmissible, even for impeachment
Reasons a Confession May Be Inadmissible
- Involuntary 2. Direct product of Miranda violation 3. 6A right to counsel has been violated 4. Direct product of illegal arrest 5. Unnecessary delay bringing D before magistrate 6. Violation of TX confession statute
Miranda Warnings
For custodial interrogations of criminal suspects, police must inform suspects of their rights and suspects must waive those rights before questioning Only required prior to custodial Interrogation
Custody
Arrest or any significant restraint on freedom of movement of an individual. A person is only in custody if he reasonably believeshe has been deprived of freedom to a degree associated with a formal arrest Officer’s subjective intent irrelevant Not all interviews are custodial (e.g., routine traffic stop, voluntary interview)
Interrogation
Express questions designed to elicit a statement, or; Its functional equivalent (i.e., words or conduct by the police which they know or should know is reasonably likely to produce a statement by teh accused
Examples Where Miranda Does not Apply
- Routine traffic stop 2. Routine investigatory question 3. Suspect voluntarily submits to questioning 4. Routine questions during booking procedures
5A Right to Counsel
Once suspect has clearly and unambiguously requrested counsel, 5A prohibits further interrogation until lawyer made available to him (unless D initiates further discussions) Once 5A right to counsel invoked, it applies to interrogations about all other crimes of which suspect may be suspected
Admissibility After Miranda Violations
Mere violations of Miranda rules not grounds for suppression of physical evidence Even if arrest is illegal, statement might be admissible if taint between arrest and confession attenuated
Jackson v. Denno: Procedures Required When an Accused Challenges Voluntariness of His Statement
- Initiated by motion to suppress 2. Trial court must then hold a hearing outside the presence of the jury and make an independent finding whether statement was voluntary 3. Court must enter order stating conclusions of law with specific findings of fact re. whether confession is voluntary 4. Conclusions may not be made known to jury 5. In TX, D may challenge voluntariness even though trial court has found confession to be voluntary 6. If court finds statement voluntary, and D raises issue by positive evidence adduced before the jury, the confession is not admissible for any purpose unless the jury believes beyond a reasonable doubt the statement was voluntary
Mandatory Recording of Custodial Interrogations
a. Applies only to interrogations in “places of detention” b. Applies only to agencies that employ officers who routinely conduct custodial interrogations c. Applies only to specified crimes (e.g., murder, kidnapping, trafficking, sex offenses against children, educator/student improprieties)
Admissibility of Written Statements Requires:
- D was given proper Miranda warnings 2. D knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his rights 3. Confession is either handwritten by D or signed by D
Admissibility of Oral Statements Requires:
Electronic recording was made 2. D received proper Miranda warnings 3. D knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his rights 4. Recording device could make accurate recording, operator was competent, and recording is accurate and unaltered 5. All voices on recording are identified; and 6. D attorney has been given accurate and complete copy of all recordings at least 20 days prior to trial
Exceptions as to When Unrecorded Oral Statement or Confession may be Admissible
- D confesses in open court, before grand jury, or at examining trial 2. Spontaneous statements by D 3. Oral confession corroborated by other reliable evidence 4. Statement not a product of custodial interrogation; or 5. to impeach credibility of D’s testimony
Pre-Arrest vs. Post-Arrest Silence
If D testifies at trial, pre-arrest silence is admissible to impeach his credibility Post-Miranda silence is never admissible to impeach ***TX Rule: All post-arrest silence is inadmissible for impeachment