TX Civ Pro & Evidence Flashcards
challenge SMJ
plea to the jrd
challenge PJ
special appearance
proper venue
1) county in which all or a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred
2) if natural person, county of residence at time COA accrued
3) if not natural person, county of D’s principal office in the state
4) if none of the above, county where P resided at time COA accrued
Permissive venue for breach of warranty by manufacturer of consumer good
county of P’s residence at time COA accrued
Permissive venue for suit on a written contract
county in which D is required to perform
deadline for P’s response to D’s motion to transfer venue
30 days prior to hearing on the motion to transfer venue (present prima facie proof)
interlocutory appeal of motion to transfer venue?
No. Appeal after final judgment. Need “reversible error.”
motion to transfer venue versus motion to change venue
MTV asks if trial court is proper venue. MCV asks if such prejudice against D in county of suit that D cannot obtain a fair and impartial trial.
what is motion to quash?
what happens if moving party wins?
D challenges the procedure used to serve D or defects in citation. Not challenging court’s power over D.
Moving party required to file an answer by 10am on first Monday after the expiration of 20 days from date service or citation quashed. P does not have to reissue citation.
What is a plea in abatement? Which pleas in abatements must be pleaded under oath?
challenge P’s pleadings by alleging facts arising outside the petition that justify the suspension or dismissal of the case. Defect in parties (ex: capacity) or allegation (another suit is pending).
1) P lacks capacity
2) there is another suit pending in TX between same parties involving same claim
[file a verified denial, then file verified plea in abatement]
objection to a pleading based on defects in substance (ex: relief not allowed by law) or form (ex: vagueness).
Special exception
Answer due date
10am on first Monday after expiration of 20 days from date D served
General denial
denies all of P’s allegations
special denial
to challenge P’s general allegation that all conditions precedent have occurred, D must specifically deny those conditions D maintains have not been met. If D does not, P need not prove those matters, as her allegations are taken as true.
which affirmative defenses must be verified (signed affidavit under oath)?
1) a contract is usurious
2) no consideration
3) failure of consideration
4) denial of the execution of an instrument in writing
5) denial of the genuineness of an assignment