Turorial 9: Antecedents Of MA Success Flashcards
Take mode
The seller can elevate price.
The buyer doesn’t understand its new market => failure
Give mode
1- be a smarter provider of growth capital (scope and scale economies)
2- provide better managerial oversight
3- transfer valuable skills (redeployment of personnel)
4- share valuable capabilities (rather than transfer)
How to success with culture in MA
- really understand the cultures of the two organisations
- take the time to do it right (manage human side)
- leverage transparency to keep people engaged
- bring people together for a purposeful dialogue
- celebrate success and failures
- care about learning and development (for employees)
- ensure leaders are prepared to coach teams
- build connections between people
Culture challenges
- no dollar value
CEOs don’t know how to mission their people to change their culture
Culture
Is the purpose , the set of values and the behaviours that are shared by a group of people that define how things get donne in an organisation.
Critical steps to integrate cultures after a merger
1- ceo decide the culture agenda
2- diagnose the differences
3- explicitly define the future culture
4- activate the new culture and embed it in the system and in the organisation
Pre and post merger issues
Pre: complementarity and cultural fit
Post: degree and speed of integration
Literature streams
- the financial economic school (stock)
- the strategic management school (relatedness, Similarity, complementarity)
- the organisation behaviour school (culture and people)
- the process school
Complementarity
Different characteristics that are independent and mutually supportive.
The greater the complementarity the greater the M&A success, cultural fit the speed and degree of integration
Cultural fit
The greater the ft the greater the MA success, speed and degree of integration.
Degree of integration
The greater the degree the greater the MA performance
-> positive effect on synergy and potential realisation vs. More change and coordination costs => better ressource redeployment and exploitation
The greater the degree the lower the speed
-> enormous changes (result asap)
Speed of integration
The greater the speed the greater the success
- > less uncertainty, resistance
- > fasted synergy and potential realisation
Fast speed
- fast exploitation of synergies
- fast ROI
- reduced uncertainty among employers
- minimise time spent in a suboptimal position
- take advantage of the momentum in the direct aftermath of the deal
Slow speed
- minimise conflict
- enhance trust between partners
- reduced disruption of existing resources and processes
+/- of cultural fit
+ lower demand for formal integration
- this effect decreases with an increase in the relative size of the target
- informal coordination cannot guarantee the desired integration and the proposed synergy realisation