Trying to Preserve Autocracy, 1855-94 Flashcards
What was the significance of the two following terms of the Emancipation Edict:
1) Serfs were declared ‘free’ and could marry who they chose, own property, set up businesses, travel and enjoy legal rights.
2) Serfs were given their own cottage and an allotment of land.
1) Enterprising peasants could buy up land, increase output and make money from the sale of surplus grain.
2) Those prepared to sell land could move to an industrialising city and obtain regular wages.
3) Land allocations varied; for some, these were insufficient to live on.
4) Peasant ‘rights’ often remained theoretical because of the other terms of the Edict.
What was the significance of the following term of the Emancipation Edict:
1) Landlords were granted government bonds as compensation.
1) Landowners could use compensation to redeem debts and invest in industrial enterprises.
2) Some could only just pay off debts and were forced to sell off their remaining land.
What was the significance of the following term of the Emancipation Edict:
1) Serfs were required to make 49 annual ‘redemption payments’ for the land they were given.
1) Redemption payments provoked unrest.
2) Land prices were sometimes fixed above market value, leaving freed serfs in considerable debt.
3) Some peasants had to work for their old masters or rent land from them (paid back with crops) to survive.
4) The ‘purchasing power’ of the peasants remained low; some became drifting landless labourers.
What was the significance of the following term of the Emancipation Edict:
1) The mir was responsible for the collection of taxes, including redemption dues.
2) Freed serfs had to remain within the mir until the redemption payments were complete.
3) The mir supervised the farming of allocated land.
1) Mirs constrained the peasants, preventing them from leaving the countryside.
2) Mirs tended to promote restrictive and backward farming practices.
What was the significance of the following term of the Emancipation Edict:
1) Landowners were allowed to retain meadows, pasture, woodland and personal land.
2) Communal open fields were controlled by the mir for use by everyone.
1) Some former serfs struggled to make a living without the use of additional land.
2) Serfs lost their landlords ‘protection.’
What was the significance of the following term of the Emancipation Edict:
1) The obruk (labour service) remained for a two-year period of ‘temporary obligation.’
1) Peasants were resentful; there were 647 peasant riots in four months after the decree.
Please give me five military reforms of 1874.
1) Conscription (for those over 20 years old) was made compulsory for all classes.
2) Length of service was reduced from 25 to 15 years, nine years of which were spent in ‘reserve.’
3) Welfare improvements, e.g. the abolition of corporal punishment and army service was no longer to be given as a punishment.
4) Military colleges were established to train officers.
5) Modern weaponry was introduced.
How successful were the military reforms of 1874?
1) A smaller but better-trained army was created.
2) Costs of the military to the government were reduced.
3) Literacy was improved through army education campaigns.
4) Officers were still mainly aristocrats and the upper classes served less time, or ‘bought’ their way out of service.
5) In the war against Turkey from 1877 to 1878, victory took longer than expected; in 1914, Russia suffered defeat.
Please give me three local government reforms of 1864 and 1870.
1) Rural councils (known as Zemstva) were established at district and provincial levels (1864).
2) Councils were to be elected through an indirect system giving an initial vote to the nobles, townspeople, Church and peasants but weighted in favour of the nobility.
3) Zemstva were given power to improve public services, including relief for the poor, and to develop industry.
How successful were local government reforms of 1864 and 1870?
1) Zemstva offered some representative government at local level.
2) They were dominated by nobles and ‘professionals’; peasants had limited influence.
3) They made significant improvements in welfare and education.
4) They provided a forum for debate on, and criticism of, government policies.
5) They had no control over taxation and law and order, Tsarist-appointed provincial governors could overturn their decisions.
Please give me four judicial reforms of 1864.
1) The reforms established a single system of local, provincial and national courts.
2) Criminal cases were before barristers and a jury.
3) All classes were judged equal before the law and proceedings were open to the public and reporters.
4) Judges’ training and pay were improved.
How successful were the judicial reforms of 1864?
1) A fairer and less corrupt system was created.
2) The jury system could undermine government control, e.g. in the case of Vera Zasulich, who was acquitted of terrorism, although guilty. As a result, from 1878, political crimes were tried in special courts.
3) Ecclesiastical and military courts continued and the reform was not applicable to Poland.
Improving standards of literacy and numeracy were necessary for Russia’s modernisation. The liberal-minded minister Alexander Golovin led some important changes - what five educational reforms were introduced to 1863-64?
1) The Zemstva took responsibility for primary education (replacing the Church).
2) Free primary education was made available to all - regardless of class and sex.
3) New vocational schools were set up at secondary level.
4) Students from both types of secondary school could progress to university.
5) Universities were made self-governing in 1863 and began offering broader and more liberal courses.
Please give me four strengths of Golovin’s educational reforms between 1856 and 1880?
1) The number of primary schools tripled.
2) The number of children in primary education more than doubled.
3) There was a greater selection of subjects - for boys and girls.
4) The number of students at university tripled.
Please give me four problems with Golovin’s educational reforms between 1856 and 1880?
1) The primary curriculum was still based on religion and offered basic reading, writing and arithmetic.
2) Secondary education was still fee-paying so was limited to the better-off.
3) More radical students joined opposition movements committed to violence.
Please give me three ways that Alexander’s reforms in the 1860s stimulated excitement and the emergence of opposition.
1) The relaxation of censorship laws encouraged the spread of more radical books.
2) Educational changes led to growth of more independent, radical student organisations.
3) Legal reforms promoted legal careers and attracted the educated middle classes who were critical of government.