Trusts group 3 Flashcards
Diplock’s Will
Charitable OR Benevolent = VOID
Re McDuff
For charitable, philanthropic or… = VOID b/c philanthropic ≠ charitable
Re Bennett
Crt can apply Ejusdem generis rule to interpretation & discard w/ necessity of reading “or” disjunctively
Salusbury v Denton
Crt CAN apply doctrine of severance and non-charitable addition from gift so that it = charitable MAXIM ‘Equity = Equlity’
Gillingham Bus
Worthy causes can = charitable;
Disaster appeals get tax relief & can be saved by Cy-Pres if Charitable;
If not – monies can go to families at T’ees discretion b/c family ≠ public;
If not – no tax relief, no cy-pres;
Wykes
T. for welfare = charitable b/c similar to poverty
Re Coulthurst
Poverty Head – poverty can include those who ‘go short’
Sanders
Houses for working class ≠ poverty
Re Darling
Gifts for benefit of poor = charitable
Dingle v Turner HOL
If aim = relieve poverty then = charitable;
If gift to particular ppl to relieve poverty ≠ charitable;
T. to pay pension to poor employees = Charitable
IRC v McMullen
Advancement of Education head – wording = wide “process of instruction, training… containing spiritual, moral, mental, physical elements”
Brit school Egyptology
Education – promote study of Egypt = Charitable
London Zoo
Zoo = charitable
Royal Choral Society
Choral singing = Charitable
Brighton college v Marriott
School for noblemen = charitable
Re Pinion
Preserving S’ors collection of paintings = mass of junk & ≠ charitable
Besterman
Research can = charitable but subject matter must be useful and knowledge passed on
s.2(2)(g) CA 2006
Education – sport – only amateur sport allowed
Oppenheim
Public benefit not =
if m’brshp = based on personal nexus
if m’brshp = based on contract
S.2(3)(a) CA 2006
Religion = mono/poly/atheistic beliefs
South place ethical society
Religion not need ethical purpose;
Religion needs –
worship of supreme being;
belief in a God;
Scientologists 2005
Not Charitable b/c not worship supreme being
Neville estates
Law adopts neutral stances on religion but assumes some is better than none;
Public sayings of mass = charitable;
Thornton v Howe
Crt won’t recognise a religion if tenants subvert morality