Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Stake's Classes > Trusts & Estates > Flashcards

Trusts & Estates Flashcards

1
Q

Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank

A

Supreme Court case that holds:

  • an estate tax is not a tax on property, it is a tax on succession
  • the right to take property as a successor is created by law (not a natural right), and the state can condition a right it creates
  • Minor illogical consequences and unfairness do not violate the Equal Protection clause of the 14th amendment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Knowlton v. Moore

A
  • a federal estate tax is constitutional
  • estate and legacy taxes are not taxes on property but taxes on succession
  • differences in tax across persons (such as progressive taxes) do not violate the constitutional requirement that taxes be uniform
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hodel v. Irving

A
  • Congress divided land among Oglala Sioux individuals, which became splintered. In 1983, Congress decided to collect and consolidate those splinters.
  • Supreme Court found this problematic because is abrogated the right to pass property by descent or devise (amounts to a taking)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Babbitt v. Youpee (extends Hodel)

A

-it is a taking if the government takes the right to give to descendants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Priority of claims to assets after a person dies

A
  • Property rights of concurrent owners (usually do not terminate)
  • Government allocation to secured creditors, to the extent of their security
  • Government allocation to private parties (families)
  • Unsecured creditors to pay D’s debts
  • Government via taxes
  • Surviving spouses
  • Allocations by decedents
  • Allocation by default rules
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Homestead allowance

A

Rights of surviving spouse (no minor or dependent children) in decedent’s probate estate ahead of creditors:

  • UPC 22-402: $22,500
  • other states: less or substantially more
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Family allowance

A

Rights of surviving spouse (and minor children the decedent was supporting/was obligated to support) in decedent’s probate estate ahead of creditors:
-UPC 2-404: Up to $27,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Exempt property

A

Rights of surviving spouse (if no spouse, children) in decedent’s probate estate beyond control of decedent and ahead of creditors:
-UPC 2-403: Household furniture, automobiles, furnishings, appliances, and personal effects up to a value of $15,000, or other assets after that

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Do former spouses qualify for homestead allowance, family allowance, exempt property?

A

NO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can rights to homestead allowance, family allowance, exempt property, be waived?

A

UPC 2-213: YES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the federal unified estate and gift tax exemption in 2021?

A

$11,700,000 plus $15,000 per person per year

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can surviving spouses effectively double the decedent’s exclusion?

A

Filing a return at decedent’s death to make the exclusion “portable”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Estate tax

A

The government’s portion depends on the net value of the decedent’s gifts before death and assets remaining at death (at varying marginal rates)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Inheritance tax

A

The government’s portion depends on the amount of each recipient’s gifts and inheritances (at varying marginal rates)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How much wealth in the United States is held by the top 20%?

A

About 83%

-The estimated is 58%, the ideal is 32%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are public goods?

A

Non-rivalrous and non-excludable. Because of free riders, they are not efficiently provided by free markets and must be provided by the government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Arguments for government controlling assets over an exemption of $1-5 million

A
  • Reduce unjust enrichment
  • Advances meritocracy, making race more fair and perhaps improving opportunities for poor kids
  • Move distribution of wealth toward an average ideal
  • Reward public capital fairly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Arguments against government controlling assets over an exemption

A
  • Foster families
  • Optimize incentives (increasing incentives for productivity, reducing incentives to waste assets)
  • Reduces decedent choice
  • Improve democracy by reducing aristocratic control
  • allow decedents to be happier before death
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What duty does a lawyer owe to the intended beneficiaries of a will?

A
  • Common law rule: The intended beneficiary has no privity and therefore the lawyer does not owe a duty to that person
  • Modern rule: Yes, there is a duty unless one of three exceptions applies:
    1. The will was never executed
    2. The suit is for failure to get the client to execute the will
    3. It is inappropriate according to a six-factor balancing test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Parks v. Fink

A

Applies modern rule, where lawyer owes a duty to the intended beneficiary in some kinds of cases, but not if an exception applies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Parks v. Fink Balancing Factors

A

To determine if lawyer owes intended beneficiary a duty:

  1. The extent to which the transaction was intended to benefit the nonclient plaintiff
  2. The foreseeability of harm to the plaintiff
  3. The degree of certainty that the plaintiff suffered injury
  4. The closeness of the connection between the defendant’s conduct and the injury
  5. Preventing future harm
  6. Extent to which the profession would be unduly burdened by a finding of liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is Stake’s proposed variation to the duty owed to beneficiary rule?

A

Lawyer is liable to a beneficiary only if the lawyer would have been liable to the client.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Policy of modern duty rules

A
  • Generate more litigation than common law rule
  • Increase lawyer liability (and as a result, cost of lawyer services)
  • Lawyers might simplify law to reduce liability
  • If lawyers increase care, their reputation may increase
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Reciprocal will

A

The first spouse to die gives the residue of the estate to the surviving spouse; the survivor gives the residuary estate to the survivor’s issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Problems with reciprocal wills

A
  • survivor changes their will
  • survivor remarries
  • spouses have conflicting interests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Potential bars to succession (none of which are actually bars in the US today)

A
  • enslaved persons (no longer a bar)
  • being an alien (not a bar in the US)
  • Minor (not a bar, just might lack legal control over assets)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Guardianship of property

A

In feudal times, a guardian took possession of the ward’s lands. This relationship is still subject to extensive judicial supervision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Conservatorship

A

A conservator of property has investment powers similar to those of trustees. More flexible than guardianship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Custodianship

A

A custodian is given property to hold for the benefit of a minor under uniform acts (often used for modest gifts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Trust

A

Holds property for the benefit of the beneficiaries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Transfer of an expectancy

A
  • Common law: Expectancy is not property, so purported transfer has no effect
  • Many states will enforce in equity a purported transfer, if fair consideration was given
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Renunciation vs. Disclaimer

A

Renunciation is by heirs and disclaimer is by devisees, although they are used interchangeably now. They may do this to an interest after the death of the decedent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

UPC disclaimer

A

The disclaimed interest passes as if X had died just before the time of distribution of that interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Why might a recipient dislciam/renounce?

A
  • To reduce taxes

- To avoid claims of the disclaimant’s creditors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Professional Responsibility relating to reciprocal wills

A
  • Duty to inform client of information needed to make informed decisions relating to representation
  • Duty to not reveal information relating to representation (exceptions: preventing substantial injury from fraud or to rectify fraud)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Engagement letter

A

Can waive conflicts and confidentiality, giving lawyers a way out when the conflict arises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Drye v. United States

A
  • Facts: Drye owed unpaid taxes when his mother died intestate. He disclaimed.
  • Issue: Was the disclaimed inheritance property under the federal law allowing attachment?
  • Holding: YES, even though state law says the money was not his. In the end, disclaimer gave him some control over where the property goes.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Actions that are bars to succession

A
  • transfer of expectancy
  • disclaimer
  • refusing to support minor decedent (cannot inherit from child)
  • killing the decedent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Constructive trust in Mahoney

A

Slayer took inheritance in law but it was held in trust for those who would take if the slayer was barred. Slayer had a duty to turn assets over to the constructive beneficiary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Slayer rule in UPC

A

UPC 2-803

  • intestate estate passes as if slayer disclaimed
  • revoke dispositions under governing instruments (wills and trusts)
  • sever interests with rights of survivorship, making a tenancy in common
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Does the law recognize rights to control images of dead persons (postmortem publicity rights)?

A
  • Common law: NO
  • Many states: unclear
  • IN, CA, and 20 other states: YES, recognize postmortem publicity rights
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Shaw Family Archives v. CMG Worldwide

A
  • Question: Are rights acquired after death controlled by decedent’s will?
  • Facts: Shaw took photographs of Marilyn Monroe and held those copyrights. CMG argues that Shaw’s licensing a photo of MM for a shirt was a violation of MM’s rights of publicity
  • Holding: NO, the will did not pass rights created by a statute after MM’s death.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Are rights acquired after death of decedent devisable?

A

UPC 2-602: YES

Shaw Family Archives v. CMG: NO, will does not pass rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What can be property subject to succession?

A
  • enslaved people
  • minors (NO)
  • unexecuted DNA instructions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Hecht v. Superior Court

A

Kane saved vials of sperm in a bank and devised them to Deborah Hecht. His adult children contested the devise, but Hecht won

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

How many Americans die without a will?

A

Approximately one half

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

What are the possibilities for what happens to property not devised?

A
  • Assets enter commons
  • Escheat to the state
  • List of recipients specified by statute
  • Hearings to determine intent of decedent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Why pass rights to family members first?

A

-The decedent would likely want relatives to succeed, as they are the natural objects of decedent’s bounty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Intestate succession

A

who succeeds to the estate remaining after taxes, creditors, allowances, and assets devised by will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Community property (intestacy)

A
  • Includes earnings from labor during the marriage and earnings from community property
  • Surviving spouse’s half of the community property and the surviving spouse’s separate property is kept by the surviving spouse
  • The decedent’s half of the community property and the decedent’s separate property passes under the will. If it is not devised by the will, it may pass to the surviving spouse or in a way similar to non community property states
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Non-community property (intestacy)

A
  • If decedent is intestate, the surviving spouse takes a share of the decedent’s estate
  • Common law: dower (life estate in 1/3 of lands of which decedent was seized during marriage of an inheritable estate)
  • Traditional statutory rule: 1/3 or 1/2 of probate estate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

UPC rules for intestacy in non-community property states

A
  • If D leaves issue and if D and S have all the same issue, S gets all
  • If D leaves no issue and no surviving parent, S gets all
  • If D leaves no issue and there is a parent, S gets $300K plus 3/4 balance
  • If D has a stepkid and S does not, S gets $225K + 1/2 balance
  • If S has a stepkid, S gets $150K + 1/2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

What stereotype does the UPC endorse with intestate succession in non-community property states?

A

Cinderella

-If one of D’s kids is not S’s, it makes sense to say that D wanted all kids to be treated equally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Classic (strict) per stirpes

A

Starting with the decedent’s children, divide by the stocks (counting living and dead with living descendants); do the same at each generation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

Modern (modified) per stirpes

A

Starting at the oldest generation in which a descendant of the decedent is alive, distribute per stirpes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

1969 UPC (per capita with per capita representation)

A

Skip any generation without living descendants, then distribute to living roots and from any deceased roots by representation as if each root were a decedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

1990 UPC (per capita at each generation)

A

Skip any generation without living descendants. Distribute to living roots. At every generation, collect the shares of deceased roots and drop the bundle to all of their issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

How does intestate succession work if no descendants and no parents survive the decedents?

A
  • UPC: Spouse takes it all

- Other states: siblings of decedent share with spouse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

What do parents take under UPC 2-103 if no issue survives the decedent?

A

Portion that does not go to the spouse goes to the parents (unless they are barred from taking for being a bad parent).

  • The parents’ portion is divided into shares equal to the number of surviving parents and deceased parents with surviving issue
  • If two or more deceased parents have exactly the same surviving descendants, they are deemed to be one deceased parent
  • A deceased parent does not get a share if all of that deceased parent’s surviving descendants are also descendants of one or more surviving parents and none of those surviving parents has any other surviving descendant.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

Under UPC 2-114, what qualifies a parent as a bad parent?

A
  • Parental rights were terminated and not reestablished
  • Child died before 18 and parental rights could have been terminated for non-support, abuse, neglect, or other actions or inactions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

How does intestate succession work under the UPC if no spouse, parents, or descendants of parents survive the decedent?

A

The estate passes to the grandparents and issue of grandparents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

Parentelic distribution

A

Form of distribution to ancestors and collaterals. The UPC is this, stopping with grandparents and their issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

Degree of relationship distribution

A

“Nearest kindred” distribution to ancestors and collaterals. Count the degrees of relationship; count the parent-child steps from one person to another. Break ties in favor of claimant in closer line (parentela). This system favors the closest genetic relative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

What happens when laughing heirs can take?

A

Lots of claims to the estate. This is costly for the estate and can delay distribution to heirs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

How is disclaimer treated under the UPC?

A

To avoid manipulation, take the disclaimed interest and treat it as though it was the disclaimant’s and the disclaimant died intestate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

Do stepchildren take in intestate succession?

A

1990 UPC: NO

2008 UPC: YES, after collaterals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

Hall v. Vallandingham

A
  • Facts: After their father died, children are adopted by their mother’s new husband.
  • Issue: Can the children inherit from their deceased father’s brother?
  • Holding: No, adoption means they are no longer considered children of their deceased father so they cannot inherit from his brother
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

UPC on Adoption

A

Adoption terminates parent-child relationship unless the adoption…

  • was by the spouse of a parent before the adoption
  • was by a relative or the spouse or surviving spouse of a relative of a parent before the adoption
  • occurred after the death of a parent before the adoption
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

If the UPC governed Hall v. Vallandingham, could the deceased father’s relatives inherit from and through the children?

A

2008 UPC: NO, no upward inheritance (but does allow downward inheritance)
2019 UPC: YES, the parent-child relationship continues to exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

Equitable/Virtual Adoption

A
  • Also called estoppel; recognized in a majority of states
  • Allows court to find an adoption where the formalities were not completed
  • Allows unadopted child to be an heir of the parent who failed to complete the adoption.
  • In certain states, may allow the unadopted child to be the devisee of parent who failed to complete adoption or heir of family of that parent.
  • Does not allow the person who failed to complete the adoption to inherit from the unadopted child.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

Did virtual adoption work in O’Neal v. Wilkes?

A

No, there was no legal contract because the parties had no legal authority to execute Hattie’s adoption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

What is the effect of the UPC’s fresh start in adoption?

A
  • A child cannot inherit from or through their genetic mother/father
  • A child can inherit from or through their adopted mother/father
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
73
Q

Can a person be adopted after reaching the age of majority?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
74
Q

What was the common law rule regarding children born out of wedlock?

A

Filius nullius - child of nobody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
75
Q

How did statutes change the common law regarding children born out of wedlock?

A
  • Mother is mother

- Father may be father (may be required to acknowledge child, marry mother, child proves paternity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
76
Q

How does the UPC treat children born out of wedlock?

A

UPC 2-117: A parent-child relationship extends equally to every child and parent, regardless of the marital status of the parent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
77
Q

In Astrue v. Capato, could posthumously conceived children take from their deceased parent?

A
  • In this case under FL law: NO
  • 2008 UPC: YES
  • 2019 UPC: Depends, not clear based on these facts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
78
Q

UPC limitations on posthumously conceived children

A

Requires child to be in utero within 36 months or born within 45 months of decedent’s death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
79
Q

How did the common law treat nearly simultaneous deaths?

A

Depended on the time of deaths, which created costs in trying to determine who died first

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
80
Q

Advancement

A

A gift by the decedent during life that reduces the heir’s share at death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
81
Q

Who can be charged with an advancement?

A

UPC: Heirs (any of those who take by intestate succession)

Many states: narrower definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
82
Q

Old Uniform Simultaneous Death Act

A

If there is “no sufficient evidence” of who died first, then half of joint property goes to each decedent and pretend the other died first for each decedent’s life insurance and other assets.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
83
Q

How does the UPC treat simultaneous deaths?

A

Taker must survive decedent by 120 hours (5 days)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
84
Q

Are negative wills effective?

A

Common law: NO

UPC: YES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
85
Q

Under the UPC, do advancements apply to partial intestacy?

A

YES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
86
Q

What are the presumptions regarding advancements?

A

English statute: Inter vivos gift was advancement
Most states: Inter vivos gift was NOT an advancement
UPC: Inter vivos gift was NOT an advancement, and only a writing can overcome the presumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
87
Q

Hotchpot

A

Add advancements to the probate estate to get the hotchpot estate and divide among all takers. Leave out advancements to advancees who would get less under hotchpot than by their advancements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
88
Q

What are some biases that might impact a parent’s giving?

A
  • Deviation by birth order

- Deviation by sex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
89
Q

What happens if there is more than one will?

A

-A more recent will amends or revokes an earlier will, either expressly or impliedly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
90
Q

Codicil

A

If a newer will revokes an older will only in part. This is read together with the old will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
91
Q

Animus testandi

A

Subjective intent of testator that T intended to make a gift with the will and intended it to be effective at death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
92
Q

What are the requirements for a valid will?

A
  • Intent
  • Capacity
  • Wills Formalities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
93
Q

Mistake in the execution

A

If the decedent did not think the instrument (or part of it) was her will, then she did not intend for the instrument to be her will and it will be denied probate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
94
Q

Can extra provisions be added to a will if the decedent mistakenly thought there were additional provisions in it?

A

No, because they were not executed properly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
95
Q

Is a coerced document admitted to probate?

A

No, because the intent for the contents to be effective in making a gift at death is absent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
96
Q

What is undue influence?

A

It overcomes the testator’s free agency/free will and has the same effect as coercion–denial of probate to all or part of will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
97
Q

Loss of free agency test

A

Identifies undue influence:

  1. Did influencer have opportunity?
  2. Did the influencer have a disposition or motive?
  3. To what degree are the results unnatural?
  4. To what degree was the decedent susceptible to psychological domination?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
98
Q

Unethical/Improper conduct approach

A

Same as loss of free agency test for undue influence, but adds a fifth factor: unethical conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
99
Q

Fraud in the execution

A
  • That led to execution of document lacking animus testandi: deny probate
  • That led to failure to execute will: impose constructive trust on takers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
100
Q

Fraud in the inducement

A
  • One approach: animus testandi was conditional on truth of something told to decedent, so part or all of will is denied probate
  • Another approach: reversed by court of equity via constructive trust
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
101
Q

What are the presumptions if a lawyer or scrivener writes himself into the will as a devisee?

A
  • Traditional will: No presumption
  • Modern rule: presumption of undue influence. Can be rebutted with independent legal advice or clear & convincing evidence of no undue influence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
102
Q

Elements of fraud

A
  • Misrepresentation
  • Made with intent to deceive and purpose to influence
  • Causing or inducing
  • A change of behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
103
Q

Intentional interference with an expectancy of inheritance

A

Elements:

  • Plaintiff has an expectancy (from a previous will, trust, or intestacy)
  • Tortious conduct against decedent (fraud, coercion, duress, etc.)
  • Causation
  • Damages, loss of value to beneficiary

Defenses:

  • D did not owe a duty to P
  • P did not exhaust probate remedies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
104
Q

Are no-contest (in terrorem) clauses honored?

A

UPC & majority of states: YES, unless there is probable cause for the contest
Minority: Yes, with exceptions for certain challenges which are allowed
Florida: No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
105
Q

Doctrine of Republication by Codicil

A

In some states, allows a court to transfer the intent or capacity from a subsequent codicil to an earlier will if that earlier will was executed in compliance with statutory formalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
106
Q

What is the legal age for testamentary capacity?

A

18

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
107
Q

What are the mental requirements for testamentary capacity?

A

Sound mind with burden of proof on contestant to show lack of capacity. Burden is not on proponent to show capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
108
Q

Propounder

A

Proponent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
109
Q

Caveator

A

Contestant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
110
Q

General Capacity

A

Testator must be capable of knowing and understanding:

  • the nature & extent of her property
  • the natural objects of her bounty
  • the connections the will is making and not making between the items of property and those persons
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
111
Q

Might a ward have a capacity to execute a will?

A

YES, if:

  • the standard is lower for capacity to write a will than for capacity to avoid being a ward
  • a person that lacks capacity often enough to become a ward might have a “lucid interval” where they have capacity to write a will
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
112
Q

Disciplinary Board v. Kuhn

A

Lawyer helped client/ward execute will, and court said that ward had no capacity. Lawyer faced discipline & suspension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
113
Q

Specific incapacity (monomania)

A
  • Was there an insane delusion?

- Did it affect a provision of the will?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
114
Q

What is an insane delusion?

A

A belief that is false and persistent (cannot be dislodged by evidence and reason to the contrary)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
115
Q

Determining whether an insane delusion materially affected a dispositive provision of the will

A

Majority: “but for/must have been test”: the dispositive provision of the will would not have been made but for the insane delusion
Minority: “might have been test”: the dispositive provision might have been the product of the insane delusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
116
Q

What is the policy behind enforcing a no-contest clause?

A
  • Saves costs of disputes
  • Reduces false negatives (denial of intended will)
  • Increases false positives (admitting unintended wills)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
117
Q

What happened in Townshend v. Townshend?

A

Testator claimed to have spoken face to face with God, who directed him to free his slaves. The testator’s intent was not honored

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
118
Q

Why require a sound mind?

A
  • Devil speaks through insane people
  • Protect decedent’s family
  • Provide care and support for the aged
  • Protect people of unsound mind from exploitation
  • Enhance legitimacy of law
  • Cost-benefit balancing (more efficient allocations with sound mind)
  • People of sound mind want the sound mind: protect me from my later self
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
119
Q

False Positive

A

Unintended will is admitted to probate (type I error)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
120
Q

False Negative

A

An instrument intended to be a will is denied admission to probate (Type II error)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
121
Q

Functions of Formalities

A
  • Evidentiary (reduce false positives)
  • Protective (reduce predatory behaviors)
  • Cautionary or Ritual
  • Channeling (send people to lawyers)
  • Reduce administrative costs of probate (reducing contested cases)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
122
Q

Formalities for wills

A
  • A writing
  • Signed by testator
  • Attested by witnesses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
123
Q

What must the writing contain?

A
  • Traditional rule: the writing must itself express the animus testandi (objective requirement)
  • UPC: Expression in the will is not required. Extrinsic evidence may establish that a document is a will
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
124
Q

Subscription

A

Signing at the bottom of the will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
125
Q

Are electronic signatures allowed?

A

Yes, in Taylor v. Holt the court admitted a will that was signed electronically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
126
Q

What are the additional formalities for attested wills?

A
  • Statute of Frauds required writing to be attested and subscribed by three witnesses
  • UPC: Must be signed by two individuals who signed within a reasonable time after witnessing the signing of the will OR the testator’s acknowledgement of the signature/will
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
127
Q

Why was the will not admitted to probate in Stevens v. Casdorph?

A

The will had not been signed in the presence of two witnesses, the witnesses did not sign in the presence of the testator, and the witnesses did not sign in each other’s presences. The court required strict compliance with the statutory requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
128
Q

What does the 2008 UPC say about notarized wills?

A

One notary is as good as two witnesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
129
Q

When do attesting witnesses need to be competent?

A
  • At time testator signs or acknowledges will/signature

- At time witness signs

130
Q

When does a witness in probate litigation need to be competent?

A
  • At time testator signs or acknowledges will/signature
  • At time witness signs (if they are also attesting witness)
  • At time of probate
131
Q

What makes a person incompetent to be a witness to a will?

A
  • Mental incompetence

- Financial interest of a necessary witness

132
Q

What happens when a necessary witness has a financial interest in the will?

A
  • Statute of Frauds: strike the witness and deny probate
  • Some purging statutes: probate will but strike gift
  • Some purging statutes: probate will but strike gain from gift
  • UPC: probate will, strike nothing
133
Q

Living probate/ante-mortem proceeding

A

Offered in some states. A person can prove a will’s validity while they are still alive.

134
Q

Holographic Wills

A

Informal wills; do not need to comply with witness requirements

135
Q

What are the requirements for an informal will?

A
  • Signature (sometimes subscription)
  • Dated (maybe)
  • Written in hand of testator
136
Q

Need the expression of the intent that this document be the testator’s will be in the hand of the decedent?

A
  • Traditional rule: YES

- UPC: NO, other portions or extrinsic evidence can establish intent

137
Q

In jurisdictions allowing holographic wills, what do courts do when part of an informal document is not in the hand of the decedent?

A
  • Oldest approach: deny probate if any part is not in T’s hand
  • UPC: signature and material portions must be in T’s hand
138
Q

Nuncupative Wills

A

Oral wills, allowed in some states under limited circumstances

139
Q

What happened in Matter of Snide?

A

Spouses signed the wrong wills, court carved narrow exception to admit the signed will even though it was not in strict compliance with formalities.

140
Q

What is UPC 2-503 harmless error?

A
  • Clear and convincing evidence that an instrument was intended to be a will is enough for probate
  • Intended to reduce false negatives
141
Q

In re Estate of Horton

A
  • Decedent committed suicide after writing a note on his phone
  • Trial court found clear and convincing evidence that he intended to leave a farewell note on his phone as his will. A handwritten note described how to reach the file
142
Q

What are the costs of UPC 2-503 harmless error?

A
  • May increase false positives
  • May increase attempts to defraud and influence
  • Reduces certainty that planning will not be undone
  • Reduces incentives to create good evidence of intent when it is cheap to do so
  • Reduces channeling to lawyers, who can improve planning for death
  • Increases administrative costs
143
Q

Integration of Wills Doctrine

A

The will is all of the papers present at the time and place of execution and intended to be part of the will

144
Q

Incorporation by reference doctrine

A

A writing that is not part of a will might be given testatmentary effect if it is incorporated by reference into a valid will. This type of document is not part of the formal will, but it is part of the probate file

145
Q

Requirements of incorporation by reference

A
  • Language in the will manifests an intent to incorporate another writing (required by UPC and all jurisdictions)
  • will must identify the writing (some variation required by UPC and all states)
  • the writing must exist at the time the will is executed
  • existence of document at death (not a UPC requirement)
  • will refers to the document as being in existence at the time of the execution (not a UPC requirement)
146
Q

What effect does a codicil have on the date of a will?

A

Updates the will as of the later date of the codicil

147
Q

UPC 2-513: Subsequent statement or list having testamentary effect

A
  • will must refer to writing
  • only for tangible personalty not specifically devised by will (not money)
  • writing describes items and persons with reasonable certainty
  • signature
148
Q

act of independent significant doctrine (UPC 2-512)

A
  • creates an exception to the formalities in cases where there is no testamentary intent
  • if contingency affecting disposition might be determined by factors other than testator’s purpose to make a devise or bequest (like having an additional child)
149
Q

what are the three approaches to dealing with mistakes in wills?

A
  • strict compliance
  • courts carve narrow exceptions
  • UPC 2-503 dispense with formalities
150
Q

what is private ordering?

A

Requiring an individual testator to opt in or opt out of certain UPC provisions (such as 2-503)

151
Q

Why require writings to have existed at the time the will was executed?

A

D could opt out of formalities in the future, imposing costs on others, externalities, and spillovers

152
Q

Methods of revocation by law

A

Divorce, marriage

153
Q

What impact does divorce have on a will?

A

Common law: Divorce works a total revocation of wills existing at divorce
UPC 2-804: Divorce works a partial revocation of gifts in wills and other instruments to the former spouse and their kin, who are treated as having disclaimed

154
Q

What impact does marriage have on a will?

A

Some states: Marriage totally revokes wills that did not provide for marriage
UPC 2-804(f): Marriage does nto revoke wills.

155
Q

What is required for volitional revocation of a will?

A
  • Intent to revoke will (animo revocandi)

- Capacity, as for a will

156
Q

What are the two methods of volitional revocation?

A
  • By instrument

- By revocatory (physical) act

157
Q

Was the will revoked in Milbourne v. Milbourne?

A

No, because the later will was executed under undue influence. Additionally, statement of intent to caretaker does not count as a revocation

158
Q

Was there a volitional revocation in Thompson v. Royall?

A
  • Judge wrote “this will is null and void” on the back of the will and the testator signed.
  • Not a revocation by instrument because there were not attesting witnesses and not a holograph.
  • Not a revocation by physical act because the will was not defaced
159
Q

Examples of revocation by physical act

A

Obliteration, cancellation, destruction

160
Q

Must revocation by physical act actually touch the words of the will?

A
  • Some courts: YES

- UPC 2-507: No

161
Q

Can a physical revocatory act be done on a copy of a will?

A

No, it must be the original

162
Q

Is partial revocation by physical act allowed?

A
  • Allowed or allowed with limits by some states
  • Not allowed by some states including Indiana
  • Allowed by the UPC
163
Q

Non-revocation (ineffective revocation)

A

When a volitional revocation is ignored even though the revocation seems to meet all requirements for a valid revocation

164
Q

Dependent Relative Revocation

A

The revocation of a will was dependent or conditional on a related will (or part of the same will) being admitted to probate. Since the related will or part is not being admitted, the condition is not met and the will or part is not revoked.

165
Q

Can the presumption of DRR be overcome?

A

Yes, if recognizing the revocation gets closer to the decedent’s intent

166
Q

What are the requirements of a revocatory act?

A

-Performed by D or D’s agent at D’s direction in D’s conscious presence
-Physical act must be performed, not just ordered or intended
-To the will, not a copy
-Traditionally, the physical act must touch the words of the will
-Presumption of revocatory act with intent to revoke if will last in D’s possession
and cannot be found or is defaced

167
Q

Can a revoked will be brought back to life?

A

Yes, under a process called revival

168
Q

If Will 1 is partially revoked by Will 2, and then Will 2 is revoked by revocatory act, what is the effect on Will 1?

A

It is rebuttably presumed alive

169
Q

How do some states approach revival?

A
  • Some states do not have revival

- In other states, Will 2 supersedes Will 1. Revoking Will 2 uncovers Will 1.

170
Q

Plain Meaning Rule (traditional rule)

A

If language accurately describes property or a likely beneficiary of the testator, the court will not admit extrinsic evidence that something else or someone else was actually intended by testator. (might be meaning that is plain to estates lawyer)

171
Q

No reformation rule (traditional rule)

A

The subjective intent of the decedent will not be a basis for reforming the instrument.

172
Q

If Will 1 is revoked by revocatory act, can it be revived under the UPC?

A

No, it is fully dead

173
Q

What are the traditional rules regarding mistake in the execution?

A

-if words were mistakenly included, we can exclude them because they lacked
intent.
-If intended provisions are omitted, admit the will anyway, but no reformation is allowed, no words can be added. We cannot include in the will words that
were not executed in compliance with the Wills Act formalities (unless they
are incorporated by reference).

174
Q

What are the traditional rules regarding mistake in the inducement?

A

If words were executed in compliance with the Wills Act and were intended to be a will, admit them to probate despite mistakes in the inducement

175
Q

UPC 2-805 Reformation Rules

A

– Reform instrument to follow clear and convincing evidence of testator’s intent.
– Applies in cases of mistake in the inducement or execution. Allows evidence of intent in more cases.
– Many jurisdictions have not adopted it.

176
Q

According to Knupp, can extrinsic evidence be used to fill in the gaps for a patent ambiguity?

A

No, only for a latent ambiguity

177
Q

According to Breckner v. Prestwood, what evidence can be heard to clear up a patent ambiguity?

A

Circumstances of D’s life, friendships, etc.

178
Q

According to Breckner v. Prestwood, what evidence can be heard to clear up a latent ambiguity?

A

What D intended AND circumstances of D’s life, friendships, etc.

179
Q

What ambiguity was present in Breckner v. Prestwood?

A

Patent (two distinct provisions giving personal property to a named beneficiary and a charity)

180
Q

What is the modern trend with patent and latent ambiguities?

A

Reject the distinction and allow extrinsic evidence to clear up any ambiguity.

181
Q

Does the UPC allow extrinsic evidence for issues of construction?

A

YES, for any issue of construction.

182
Q

What is the effect of allowing extrinsic evidence in all cases?

A

Rejects the plain meaning rule

183
Q

Specific devise example

A

I give to X my ring (reference to specific asset)

184
Q

General devise example

A

I give to X $100

185
Q

Demonstrative devise example

A

I give to X $100 from the sale of my stock (this is specific to the extent of stock proceeds, general to the extent other sources are used to make up the rest of the gift).

186
Q

Residuary devise example

A

I give to X the residue of my estate

187
Q

Class gift example

A

“I give the residue to my children,” NOT “I give the residue to Laura, Alison, and Christopher.”

188
Q

What gifts are void?

A

Gifts to…

  • an animal
  • God
  • A devisee who was dead at the time the will is executed
189
Q

What is lapse?

A

A gift to…

  • Common law: Devisee alive at execution of will but dead before the testator
  • UPC: Devisee alive at execution of will but dead before 120 hours after death of testator
190
Q

What do antilapse statutes do?

A

Provide substitute takers in some situations (but not all situations)

191
Q

Is there antilapse under the common law?

A

NO! Antilapse rules are statutory

192
Q

What did court apply in Breckner v. Prestwood to resolve the patent ambiguity?

A

Ejustem generis, which limited the scope of personal property

193
Q

Does a gift lapse if an alternative taker is specified for that particular gift?

A

NO

194
Q

What happens to a specific or general devise if the devisee cannot take?

A

Goes to residuary devisees

195
Q

What happens to a residuary devise if the devisee cannot take?

A
  • Common law: Intestate successor (no residue of residue)

- UPC: Other residuary devisees

196
Q

What are the requirements of most lapse statutes (including UPC 2-603)?

A
  • A substitute taker (descendant surviving at the time of D’s death)
  • Relationship between testator and devisee (under the UPC, a grandparent or descendant of grandparent of D. In some states, descendant of D).
197
Q

Do lapse statutes create default or limiting rules?

A

Default

198
Q

Do words of survivorship suffice for a will to opt out of the lapse statute?

A
  • Majority of states: YES

- UPC: NO

199
Q

Do lapse statutes apply to some class gifts?

A

Yes, in most states and under the UPC, if one member of the class dies, the gift can go to a substitute taker

200
Q

Ademption by extinction

A
  • Common law: If property is gone, gift is adeemed by extinction
  • UPC 2-606: Devisee gets gifts still in the estate plus (1) unpaid purchase price, (2) unpaid condemnation award, (3) unpaid insurance, (4) property obtained from foreclosure on unpaid obligation, (5) tangible replacement property, (6) pecuniary devise equal to the value of the specific devise to the extent the testator did not intend to adeem
201
Q

Devise of stock that increases after will execution

A

-Traditional rule:
Specific devise - devise increases, number of shares grows
General devise - devise and number of shares stays the same
-UPC 2-605: If testator had enough shares both at time of will execution and at death, number of shares grows

202
Q

Does the devise grow if the increase in shares was before the will was executed?

A
  • Strunk: Yes

- UPC: No

203
Q

Can a gift to spouse B satisfy the devise to A?

A

A change in the 1990 UPC implies that a gift to B can adeem by satisfaction the devise to A

204
Q

What is the priority when some distribution must be reduced?

A

Abatement order:

  1. Property not disposed of by the will
  2. Residuary devises
  3. General devises
  4. Specific devises
205
Q

What is ademption by satisfaction?

A

Gift to devisee during life of testator with intent to adeem gift to devisee

206
Q

Who pays the debt on pledged property in a specific devise?

A
  • Common law: Presume debt paid out of residue

- UPC: Presume specific devisee pays debt

207
Q

What is pretermission?

A

Omission of heirs from will executed before the person was an heir apparent

208
Q

What are the default rules for pretermission of spouse?

A

UPC 2-301: Might provide a share of the estate to the pretermitted spouse

  • Exceptions: not intestate share if it looks like D did not intend S to take
  • Intestate share of estaet minus gifts to some children
209
Q

What is the default rule for pretermission of child of D not in D’s will?

A
  • After-born and after-adopted children are protected someitmes.
  • After-known children are not protected
  • UPC 2-302 adds protection for children D failed to provide for only because D thought they were dead
210
Q

Should you have a contract relating to a will?

A

No, they are generally a bad idea and have limited enforcement

211
Q

Inter vivos gifts

A

Gratuitous transfers that take effect during life.
Requirements: intent, delivery, acceptance
Cannot be revoked

212
Q

Gifts causa mortis

A

Extra requirement: anticipated death from some peril

  • Revocable automatically if you survive peril
  • Volitionally revocable if there is intentional revocation
213
Q

Tenancy by the entirety

A
  • Unities: marriage, time, title, interest, possession

- Cannot be unilaterally severed other than by divorce

214
Q

Joint tenancy

A
  • Unities: time, title, interest, possession

- One joint tenant can unilaterally sever her portion into a Tenancy in Common, revoking right of survivorship

215
Q

Tenancy in Common

A

Unity: possession

216
Q

Right of survivorship in TxE and JT

A

When one party dies, that party’s interest vanishes. The interest of the remaining party swells

217
Q

Partition by Sale

A

Any tenant in common or joint tenant has the power to sell an interest to a person outside the family. That person can ask for a partition by sale. If the court grants the sale, the entire property can e purchased by the highest bidder, a person outside the family, which displaces the heirs outside the family

218
Q

Payment on death contracts

A

“When I die, pay X.”

  • If they work, the title changes at death. They are revocable and amendable.
  • Under common law, these were viewed as testamentary and not valid unless executed in compliance with the wills act formalities
  • UPC 6-101: Statutes in almost all states allow them to be enforced even though they act like a will
219
Q

What was the first exception to the Wills Act?

A

Life insurance

220
Q

Can life insurance beneficiary designations be changed by divorce?

A

Yes

  • UPC: YES, automatic revocation
  • Hillman v. Maretta: For federal employee life insurance, NO
221
Q

Can life insurance beneficiary designations be changed by a will?

A
  • Yes, in some states

- Cook case: NO

222
Q

What are pay on death accounts?

A
  • Mutual funds
  • POD brokerage account
  • Banks and brokerages (like mulitparty bank accounts)
  • Medical Savings Accounts
  • IRAs
223
Q

Does divorce revoke a POD designation in a pension covered by ERISA (Egelhoff case)?

A

ERISA displaces the state law, so the pension POD designation controls. In Egelhoff, D’s former wife won

224
Q

what type of trust is involuntary?

A

Constructive trust imposed for fairness

225
Q

What does it take to create a trust?

A

Capacity, intent, manifestation of intent, res, beneficiary, trustee, active duty for trustee

226
Q

What capacity is required for trusts?

A
  • Testamentary: Capacity to execute a will

- Inter vivos: Capacity to execute a deed or make a gift

227
Q

Are specific “magic words” required to demonstrate intent to create a trust?

A

No, and the settlor does not need to know what a trust is. There simply must be an objective manifestation of intent to give one party legal title for the benefit of another.

228
Q

What is the res?

A

Property in the trust, which must be identified with reasonable certainty

229
Q

Are pets definite beneficiaries in trust?

A
  • Common law: Honorary trusts are allowed for pets, but they are not real trusts
  • UTC 408/UPC 2-907: A trust may be created for animals alive during the life of the settlor. Any extra money goes to settlor or settlor’s successors
230
Q

What are the requirements of trust beneficiaries?

A
  • Some person capable of holding title
  • Someone different from the trustee
  • Someone other than grantor, unless intent is to set up a grantor trust
231
Q

Will a trust fail for want of a trustee?

A

No, the court can appoint a trustee

232
Q

Will a trust fail for want of an active duty for a trustee to perform?

A

Yes. If the trustee has no active duty to perform, it is a passive trust.

233
Q

Revocable trusts

A
  • Testamentary in nature
  • Do not comply with Wills Acts
  • Void under old common law, but are now valid even without Wills Act compliance
  • Traditional rule: Right to revoke or amend had to be retained in the trust instrument and settlor had to follow method specified
  • UTC: Default is that a trust is revocable and amendable, and settlor can amend by following terms of trust or some other method manifesting clear and convincing evidence of settlor’s intent
234
Q

Pourover Will

A

When a will devises assets to a trust

235
Q

Can a will fund an inter vivos trust that has no res before the death of the testator?

A
  • Old common law: No

- UTATA, UPC: Yes, providing the res that brings an inter vivos trust to life.

236
Q

Who is the trustee’s duty to when the trust is revocable?

A

The settlor

237
Q

Rights in the res for revocable trust

A
  • Settlor holds rights
  • Trustee’s duties are to settlor
  • Settlor’s creditors can compel distribution of property before death, and often after death
  • Beneficiary has no legally enforceable interest and their creditors cannot compel a distribution
238
Q

Rights of creditors to reach assets in an irrevocable trust

A
  • Settlor has no rights unless they are also a beneficiary, so creditors cannot reach trust property
  • Trustees have no beneficial rights unless they are also a beneficiary, so their creditors cannot reach the trust property
239
Q

Hamilton Order

A

Order secured by creditor that trustee must pay the creditor before paying the beneficiary. Creditor cannot compel payments by trustee, but can attach payments the trustee decides to make.
*prohibited by statute in some states

240
Q

Rights in the res of a mandatory (irrevocable) trust

A
  • Beneficiary can compel a distribution as specified in the trust instrument
  • Creditor can compel same distribution
241
Q

Rights in the res of a discretionary trust subject to an ascertainable standard

A
  • If no creditor will intercept distribution, beneficiary can compel distribution as per standard
  • If creditor will intercept distribution and standard is one that depends on debtor actually receiving the distribution (such as support or comfort), creditor cannot compel a distribution because it would not serve specified purpose
242
Q

Rights in res of discretionary trust not subject to a standard

A
  • Beneficiary cannot compel distribution unless court finds abuse of discretion
  • creditor cannot compel distribution, unless court finds abuse of discretion and only to that extent
  • creditor can get a Hamilton order
243
Q

Protective trust

A

shifts from subject to a standard to completely discretionary when creditor tries to attach, so creditor gets nothing

244
Q

Exception creditors w/ discretionary trust

A
  • May include spouse, former spouse, child with support order
  • Common law: no different from other creditors
  • UTC 504: These creditors can compel a distribution if the trustee has abused discretion
245
Q

Spendthrift trusts

A

Stops some creditors of beneficiaries from reaching trust assets
-Exception creditors can reach despite spendthrift clause

246
Q

Scheffel v. Krueger

A

Victim of child abuse cannot recover from perpetrator’s spendthrift trust

247
Q

Exception creditors under the UPC

A
  • spouse, former spouse, or child with support order
  • IRS claims for federal taxes
  • Lawyer claims for providing services for the protection of a beneficiary’s interest in the trust
248
Q

Asset Protection Trust (self-settled trust)

A

S creates a trust for S’s own benefit that is unreachable by S’s creditors

  • Not allowed under common law
  • Minority of states allow it now
249
Q

Duties of trustees

A
  • prudence
  • loyalty
  • care
  • act impartially
  • other subsidiary duties (collect and conserve property, not to comingle, keep & render accounts, inform, not to delegate, inquire)
250
Q

When can a trust be terminated?

A
  • Trust terms say so
  • Trust reached its maximum age under statutes limiting duration
  • illegal
  • impossible
  • uneconomic (UTC 414)
  • settlor and all beneficiaries agree
251
Q

Can a trust be terminated if the settlor and some beneficiaries agree?

A
  • Traditional rule: NO

- UTC 411: YES, if other beneficiaries will be protected

252
Q

Can a trust be terminated if the settlor is dead and all beneficiaries agree?

A
  • England: YES

- USA: Claflin rule

253
Q

Claflin Rule

A

As long as the trust might serve a material purpose, do not terminate it. The court protects the settlor’s intent
*Protection limited to period of RAP

254
Q

Reforming a trust

A

A Court may reform a trust to correct mistakes in accordance with settlor’s intention

255
Q

UTC requirements for reforming trust

A

Clear and convincing evidence that both the settlor’s intent and the terms of the trust were affected by a mistake

256
Q

Administrative deviation

A

change in the management of the property

257
Q

Distributive deviation

A

change in the distributions from the trust, who takes, or what or when it is taken

258
Q

When can a court grant an administrative deviation?

A

Traditional (equitable deviation doctrine):
-compliance with the terms would substantially impair the accomplishment of a material purpose of the settlor AND
-circumstances have changed in ways that the settlor did not anticipate
UTC 412: Continuation of trust on its existing terms “would be impracticable or wasteful or impair the trust’s administration”

259
Q

What does Stake think of APT?

A

Race to the bottom

260
Q

When can a court grant a distributive deviation?

A
  • Traditional rule: court did not allow change in share of one beneficiary who would then qualify ofr public assistance
  • UTC 412/modern trend: A court may modify or terminate the trust if there are circumstances not anticipated by the settlor and modification or termination would further the purposes of the trust
261
Q

Supplemental Needs Trust

A

Can provide only the benefits the state will not provide, maximizing support from the state.
*Terms provide that trustee shall not make distribution that would disqualify beneficiary from state support

262
Q

Decanting a Trust

A

Pouring first trust’s assets into a second trust. Does not require judicial approval.

263
Q

What is the problem if it is hard for beneficiaries to remove the trustee?

A

Trustee with discretion might deviate from the intent of the settlor, devoting too little attention to the needs of the beneficiaries

264
Q

What is the problem if it is easy for beneficiaries to remove the trustee?

A

Beneficiaries might press trustee to deviate from the intent of the settlor by threatening to remove trustee

265
Q

Can the beneficiaries demand a change in the trustee?

A
  • Common law: Unless the trust instrument allowed this, only for cause
  • UTC: If co-trustees are no cooperating or if there is a substantial change in circumstances/all qualified beneficiaries request
266
Q

What might trust protectors be empowered to do?

A

-approve equitable deviations
-terminate trust
-remove trustee
(Approve changes that a court might not allow)

267
Q

Advantages of trusts over wills

A
  • jurisdiction choice
  • standards for incompetence of a person can be established and applied without litigation
  • Not automatically on record
268
Q

Advantages of wills over trusts

A
  • non claim statutes bar creditors of estates

- formalities reduce opportunities for overreaching and malefaction

269
Q

What is a charitable purpose?

A

UTC 405: Relief of poverty, advancement of education or religion, promotion of health/governmental/municipal purposes, other purposes that benefit community

270
Q

Charitable Trust characteristics

A
  • Need not have a definite beneficiary
  • Must have a charitable purpose (not merely benevolent)
  • Court may cy pres a charitable trust if impracticable
271
Q

Cy pres

A

Reforming a trust instead of terminating it to operate as nearly as possible to what the settlor intended.

272
Q

Is specific charitable intent enough for reforming a trust?

A

No, the settlor must have general charitable intent

273
Q

Does “children” include adoptees?

A
  • In most jurisdictions, adopted minor child is presumed to be included in a class gift made by an adoptive parent’s ancestor
  • UPC: default rules that turn in part on whether adopting parent performed functions of a parent
274
Q

Powers of Appointment

A

Donee of a power can transfer appointive property to objects (or permissible appointees) of the power. Transfer occurs when donee exercises power.

275
Q

Inter vivos power of appointment

A

Created by “Donee may appoint by deed”

276
Q

Testamentary power of appointment

A

Created by “Donee may appoint by will”

277
Q

Exclusive power of appointment

A

allows donee to appoint to some objects (permissible appointees) and exclude others

278
Q

Nonexclusive power of appointment

A

Requires donee to appoint to all permissible appointees

279
Q

General power of appointment

A
  • Objects include at least one of donee, donee’s estate, creditors of either
  • income to property is taxable to donee
  • appointments are treated as gifts from the donee to the objects
  • creditors of donee might be able to reach property
280
Q

When can creditors of a donee reach the appointive property if the donee has a general power?

A
  • Common law: If he never exercised it, it was not his. Creditors cannot reach
  • UTC: Creditors can reach whether or not person has exercised power.
281
Q

What happens if takers in default of appointment are named?

A

Named takers in default take because they have a vested interest subject to divestment by appointment

282
Q

What happens if there are no takers in default of appointment named?

A
  • Nongeneral: Permissible appointees take unless they are too numerous
  • General: Donor takes (or donor’s estate if donor is dead)
283
Q

What happens if there is fraud on a special power?

A

Object gets nothing

284
Q

Freehold estates (seisin if legal interest in land)

A
  • Fee simple: Can last forever
  • Fee tail: Lasts as long as it can be passed down to issue
  • Life estate: Can last for the lifetime of a human or set of humans
285
Q

Nonfreehold estates (no seisin)

A
  • Term of years: until a fixed ending time
  • Periodic tenancy: repeating period until terminated by either at the end of a period
  • Tenancy at will: until either party lacks the will to continue
  • Tenancy at sufferance: until the landlord chooses
286
Q

Defeasible

A

An interest that may terminate before reaching its maximum duration

287
Q

Two ways to make an interest defeasible

A
  • Special limitation: temporal language such as during, while, as long as, for so long as, until
  • Condition subsequent: conditional language such as if, but if, provided, on the condition that
288
Q

Present interest

A

interest that is possessory now, vested in possession and interest

289
Q

future interest

A

will become possessory, if at all, in the future. A set of rights that exist today, but not yet vested in possession

290
Q

Future Interests Retained by Transferor

A
  • Reversion: if O did not transfer a vested estate of the same quantum as she had (in O or O’s heirs)
  • Possibility of reverter: O transfers a vested estate of same quantum while attaching to that estate a special limitation operating in O’s favor.
  • Right of Entry: O transfers an estate but attaches a condition subsequent that operates in her own favor (not automatic, must be exercised)
291
Q

Requirements for Remainders

A

Cannot be a remainder if it…

  • could cause seisin to spring from O in the future
  • could cut short a previous transferee’s vested estate by a condition
  • follows a vested interest
292
Q

Vested Remainder

A

Has an ascertainable taker AND there is no unsatisfied condition precedent

293
Q

Contingent Remainder

A

Has no ascertainable taker OR there is an unsatisfied condition precedent

294
Q

Can someone be an heir of the living?

A

NO

295
Q

What is a condition precedent?

A

The words of the condition precede the taker or are wrapped up in the description of the taker

296
Q

Is release possible for a power of appointment?

A

YES

297
Q

How were contingent remainders destructible under the common law?

A
  • Merger

- If it failed to vest in interest in time to vest in possession

298
Q

Springing executory interest

A

Takes from the grantor or grantor’s heir

299
Q

Shifting executory interest

A

Takes by cutting off a vested grantee

300
Q

When is an executory interest vested in interest?

A

When it vests in possession

301
Q

Determinable interest

A

an interest that might end early by a special limitation and the limitation operates in favor of the transferor or a remainderperson

302
Q

Special fertility rules when identifying future interests

A
  • a person can conceive children until death

- a person cannot conceive children after death

303
Q

Merger Doctrine

A

If one person holds two vested legal estates in land, a vested LE followed by a vested remainder or a reversion in FS, the former merges into the latter

304
Q

Does the common law require survival to the time of possession?

A

NO

305
Q

Surplusage

A

Conditional language that restates a condition or limitation already expressed. Those words are ignored

306
Q

Does the UPC require survival to the time of possession?

A

YES, there is a survival requirement

  • A future interest in trust is contingent on survival until date of distribution
  • If holder does not survive but leaves issue, make a substitute gift to the issue of the holder of the future interest
307
Q

Heirs

A

Those who would take by intestacy. They must survive A, at the least

  • Traditional rule: only need to survive to A’s death
  • UPC: Must survive until time of distribution
308
Q

Rule in Shelley’s Case

A

Applies when one instrument creates a life estate in A and a remainder in A’s heirs. A will have fee simple.

309
Q

Doctrine of Worthier Title

A

If O gives a life estate to A, then remainder to O’s heirs, the DoWT creates a reversion in fee simple for O.

310
Q

Rule of Convenience

A

The class closes when any member of the class is entitled to possession and enjoyment of a share. At that point, no more people can enter the class.

311
Q

Rule Against Perpetuities

A

An interest is void if it might vest too late. If it is valid, you can find a validating life.

312
Q

Void under RAP

A

The offending interest is struck from the instrument, but the entire instrument is not void

313
Q

Class Gift Rule

A 
Bad as to one, bad as to all.
If an interest might vest in any member of the class too late, the class gift is void for all members of the class
314
Q

Time period for RAP

A

More than 21 years plus periods of actual gestation after the deaths of all persons alive when the perpetuities period starts to run

  • Wills: death of testator
  • Ordinary gifts: at delivery
  • Inter vivos transfers in revocable trust: when irrevocable
315
Q

What is the effect of statutes that made CRM indestructible?

A

Made some CRMs void under the RAP

316
Q

How does RAP apply to general powers of appointment?

A

Power is void if it might become exercisable too late. Interest created by exercise of power is void if it might vest too late, starting at exercise

317
Q

How does RAP apply to other powers of appointment (not general)

A

An interest created by the power is void if it might vest too late–measured from time power was created

318
Q

RAP Reforms

A
  • Carve exceptions for cases with bad results (statutes or common law)
  • Cy pres for all instruments or trusts
  • wait and see for common law period (until measuring lives end, plus 21 years + 10 months)
  • wait and see for a fixed period
  • abolition of RAP
319
Q

When is an interest good under USRAP?

A
  • it vests or terminates within 90 years OR

- it is good under common law

320
Q

Benefits of RAP

A
  • Facilitates efficient transfer of resources
  • Reduces dead hand control of the behavior of the living
  • Reduces uncertainty from contingent changes in ownership
  • Adds enjoyment from ownership of future interests
  • Avoids problem of first-generation monopoly
  • Reduces problem of accumulations
  • Reduces problem of multiplication of beneficiaries
321
Q

Costs of RAP

A
  • Injustice when transferor’s intent is ignored because of bad drafting
  • Some desired transfers are impossible, so testators feel constrained
  • Upsets grantees when RAP invalidates their gifts
  • Testators are disappointed when results do not conform to expectations

Stake's Classes (3 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions