Trusts Flashcards
Settlor = person creating the trust
Express trusts
Settlor intends to create and declares so expressly
Types:
1. Private
a. Inter vivos trusts (lifetime trusts)
b. Testamatory trust
- Charitable
Types of express private trusts
- Fixed
- Discretionary
- Purpose
Implied trusts
Settlor does not expressly state a clear intention to create a trust but equity implies the intention to create a trust in order to achieve a fair result
Types:
1. Resulting
2. Constructive
Express private trusts - three certainties
- Intention - intention of settlor to create the trust must be clear and certain
- Subject matter - must be certain
- Objects - must be certain - clear who beneficiaries are
Certainty of intention
- Settlor must clearly show they intend to place trustee under binding obligation
- Shown by words or conduct
Settlor cannot create a trust in property they plan to acquire - they must own the property or an interest in the property at time of creation of trust
Settlor must intend that trust takes effect immediately
Certainty of subject matter
Must be clear what property is subject to trust
A description of a fractional share of an intangible asset like company shares shows a certainty of subject matter.
Descriptions like “the bulk of my property” and “one of my houses in London” are not sufficiently certain.
There is no certainty of subject matter in an interest that the settlor does not yet have, such as the expectation of inheriting under a will.
Fixed trusts
Trustee has no discretion as to how the trust property is to be shared among beneficiaries
Fixed trusts: test for certainty of objects
Complete list test - trust will fail if complete list of beneficiaries can’t be drawn up e.g. best friends = trust fails
Conceptual and evidential certainty required
Not being able to find a specific beneficiary will not cause trust to fail - apply to court for order to distribute funds despite being unable to locate beneficiary
Discretionary trusts
Trustee has discretion on how to share out the trust property amongst an identifiable group of beneficiaries
Discretionary trust: test for certainty of object
Given postulant test - it must be possible to say with certainty whether or not a given individual is a member of the group or class that may benefit
Conceptual certainty required
Evidential certainty not required
A discretionary trust will fail if the proposed class of objects is so large it makes it administratively unworkable
If a trust fails for lack of certainty of objects, the law implies a resulting trust over property in question in favour of the settlor or settlor’s successors i.e goes back to settlor o whoever inherited settlor’s property
Beneficiary principle
Trust must have ascertainable human beneficiaries
A valid express trust requires at least one trustee otherwise trust will fail
A testamentary trust will not fail for lack of trustee. If there is only one trustee who dies the court can appoint a new trustee so the trust continues
Who can be a trustee?
Anyone who has capacity to hold property for their own benefit
Minors cannot be trustees
There is generally no minimum or maximum number of trustees for a valid trust
EXCEPTION: trust of land - at least two but no more than four trustees
Rules against perpetuity
Prevents settlor from making trusts that will last for a very long period of time
Two rules:
1. Remoteness of vesting rule:
- Applies to contingent interests (interest which are conditional on a future event)
- Interest must vest within perpetuity period of 125 years
2. Inalienability rule:
- Applies to express trusts for non-charitable purpose trusts
- Trust limited to 21 years or life in being plus 21 years
Criteria for valid express inter vivos trust
- Three certainties satisfied
- Appropriate trustees selected
- No breach of perpetuity rules
- Trust validly created
Creation of inter vivos trusts
- Settlor can declare themselves trustee (through words or conduct) and is instantly and validly created
Exception: trust of land must be in writing
- Trust with another as trustee - two requirements for trust to be valid:
a. Settlor must transfer property to trustee (constituting the trust - transferring legal title to property to trustees)
b. Settlor must make valid declaration of trust (through words or conduct with exception of land which must be in writing)
Constituting the trust
Transferring legal title to property to trustees
Methods of transfer:
1. Land: transfer document needed which must be delivered to trustees
2. Chattels: simply handed over
Equity will not assist a volunteer (beneficiary)
If the trust is invalid it will simply fail, equity will not step in and fix this as the beneficiary is receiving a gift and has not paid for the assets in question
Exceptions:
1. Every effort test: imperfect trust still valid if settlor did everything to transfer property and put property outside settlor’s control
- Donatio mortis causa (gift by reasons of death): gift made in contemplation of imminent death
- Fortuitous vesting rule/rule in Strong v Bird: settlor dies before trust is properly constituted but intended trustee is settlor’s personal representative and so trust treated as validly constituted BUT will not apply if clear settlor changed their mind about the gift before their death
- Proprietary estoppel: gift valid when beneficiary relied on assurance to their detriment
Testamentary trusts - requirements
- Valid will
- Three certainties (intention, subject and object)
- Perpetuity rules satisfied
- No transfer requirement at time of creation
General rule for testamentary trusts is that all terms of the trust must appear in the will
Exceptions:
1. Secret trust: trust not revealed in will
2. Half secret trust: trust revealed in will but beneficiary not identified
Secret trusts
- Beneficiary must prove terms of trust by clear and convincing evidence
- Timing of communication to trustee irrelevant
- Trust fails if trustee fails to accept it or did not know about it until after settlor’s death
Half secret trusts
- Communication of beneficairy’s identity must be made to trustee on or before will execution
- Will cannot refer to future communication e.g. testator will tell trustee of full details of half secret trust at a later date
If a half secret trust fails the law will imply a resulting trust.
Fixed trusts
Specific interest of each beneficiary is clealry defined
Vested interest
No conditions attached to interest
Contingent interest
Condition attached to interest
Limited interest
No right to trust capital (benficairy)
For example: lifetime interest
Absolute interest
Right to capital and income (beneficiary)
Lifetime interest
Beneficiary can only claim income generated from trust assets during their lifetime e.g. from shares
Beneficial entitlement: discretionary trusts
Trustee has discretion
No potential beneficiary can take enforcement action to insist on receiving a share of the assets or income BUT anyone who falls within the potential class of beneficiaries can take action against the trustee for any breach of trust
Mixed trust
Includes fixed and discretionary aspects
Rule in Saunders v Vautier
Beneficiaries can terminate trust if they:
- Together have absolute interest
- Are adults of sound mind
Rule cannot be relied upon if one or more of beneficiaries is a minor
Applies to fixed and discretionary trusts
Implied trusts
No intention to create a trust has been expressly stated BUT equity steps in to imply a trust in order to achieve a fair outcome
Implied trusts: resulting trusts
Implied by law based on the presumed intention of settlor where they haven’t expressed an intention to create a trust
An equitable interest is created in trust property that goes back to settlor if settlor is still alive
When resulting trusts arise
- Voluntary transfer or purchase in name of another
a. Unexplained gifts of property to others
b. Property purchased in name of one person but some or all of price paid by another
- Money must be used to purchase property
- Money must be provided at or before time title vests in trustee
- Claimant has burden of proving they paid towards purchase price - Failure to exhaust beneficial interest under express trust
When a person provides the purchase money for property but the legal title is transferred to another person, the general presumption is that the other person holds the legal title on resulting trust for the purchaser
Presumption of advancement
A presumption arises that the person making the voluntary transfer or providing the purchase money intended to make a gift to the other party (no presumption of resulting trust)
When does this apply?
1. Husband/finance to wife/fianacee (doesn’t apply in reverse)
2. Father to child
3. Person in loco parentis (someone who has taken on parental responsibilities of a person) tor recipient, includes transfers from mother to child when she has sole responsibility of child as a single parent
Presumption of advancement can be rebutted by the transferor or provider of purchase money by providing clear evidence they didn’t intend to make a gift
Evidence to rebut presumptions
- Surrounding circumstances
- Acts or declarations made before or at the time of transfer
Resulting trust arising on failure of express trust
A resulting trust will be implied when a half secret trust fails for lack of communication
Law implies a resulting trust in two situations
- Voluntary transfer and money cases
- Failure of express trust
Legal title in both names
- Legal title held as joint tenants
- Own property equally
- Equitable interest can be held as joint tenants (right of survivorship) or tenants in common (no right of survivorship)
Express declaration of trust
State whether equitable interest in property is held as tenants in common or as joint tenants
If tenants in common it will state the specific share the tenants hold in the property