Trusts 1 Flashcards
What are the different types of express trusts?
Fixed interest trusts
- trustees have no discretion
- settlor specified proportions (e.g. equal shares/my children)
- if silent on shares will take, presumed share equally
Discretionary trusts
- as to amount received and/or who is beneficiary
(e.g. “shares as see fit”)
Requirements for valid/enforceable EXPRESS trust?
If fulfilled, what is trust deemed to be and what does this mean?
- Valid declaration of trust
(e.g. I give you Tower H for you to hold on trust for the benefit of my children in equal shares) - Put assets into trust
(e.g. transfer deed)
(if you EXPRESSLY TRUST in your ASSETS DECLARE them !)
= CONSTITUTED
i.e. settlor cannot change mind
(if not constituted properly, remains absolute legal owner)
Rules regarding DECLARATION of trust?
Brief explanation of each pls
Three certainties of:
- Intention
clear from settlor’s words or conduct that intended to make a trust - Subject matter
trust property AND individual beneficial interests clear - Objects
clear who beneficiaries will be
(different tests for fixed / discretionary)
(ISO) (I soooo can’t be bothered with trusts)
Also:
- Beneficiary principle
- Perpetuities
- Formalities
Explain beneficiary principle?
Trust must generally benefit individuals who can go to court to enforce
Satisfied automatically for express trusts
(ie fixed interest or discretionary)
Explain perpetuity principle?
What is it also known as?
‘rule against remoteness of vesting’ / ‘rule against perpetuity’
Trust can’t go on for too long
(like perpetua)
Beneficiaries must have been SELECTED (if discretionary) and/or become ENTITLED to trust property (for all trusts) within 125 YEARS of trust’s creation
(125 yrs for trusts 1 April 2010 only - so usually not an issue)
(perpetua probs 125)
Formalities for valid express declaration of trust over :
(a) land (inc via email)
(b) property other than land
(c) will
Land:
- signed, writing, contain all material terms
(WTS!) - can be oral as long as follow up in WTS afterwards
- does not need to be sent to beneficiary
Email (land only)
- initials/nickname/last name constitutes a signature
- electronic signature counts (especially if kind reg etc above it)
- email address does NOT count
Lifetime of trusts other than land -
oral fine
(written good practice)
Will trusts
- contained in valid will
(signed, written, 2 witnesses)
Certainty of intention:
Is it necessary to use words ‘trust’? What will suffice?
“as much yours as is mine?”
No
Words or conduct
Good if says the word trust
But if not, just imposes obligation to hold property for benefit of someone else
Words must be obligatory or mandatory
About substance and effect of words used
e.g. frequently told “the money is as much yours as it is mine”
- on whole obvs trust was intended
Precatory words - e.g. ‘wish’ and ‘hope’
Will they create a trust?
What about “i trust u will?”
No, must be obligatory or mandatory
e.g. neither of these sufficient:
“I am giving you X in hope you look after it for me”
“I trust you will give vase to my kids”
(in hope we do not trust)
If there is no certainty of intention, what will there be?
Likely deemed to have intended and made a gift
For trust’s subject matter to be certain, the property must be described with certainty.
Explain.
What if things will acquire eg in a trust?
- Must be identifiable property.
- Must constitute property
- future property which don’t own but anticipate will does not count
(e.g. “shares I will get in A’s will) - If part of collection, not valid unless all identical or identifiable/segregated/specified
(e.g. some of my silver)
wine case
- company said held wine on trust for customers after order
- went into administration
- customers who had ordered wine before then did not get it back
- because their wine had not been segregated or labelled with customer’s names so not identifiable and no valid trust
hunter v moss
- identical shares, did not matter which shares were held on trust, so valid subject matter
To be valid express trust, must be valid declaration of trust.
To be valid declaration of trust, must be certainty of subject-matter.
To be certainty of subject-matter, beneficial interests must be certain.
Explain requirement that beneficial interests are certain.
(nb applies to discretionary and fixed interest)
- beneficiaries shares or interests are defined with sufficient certainty
e.g.
- silent on shares - valid - assumed that share equally
- “as see fit” - valid - trustee discretion
- ‘generous amounts’ - not valid too uncertain
e.g.
- 2 houses - one to M who can choose whichever she wants and K gets the other - M died before chose, K lost entitlement
(was only entitled to one M didn’t choose, and M never chose)
What may happen where there is no certainty of subject-matter?
- If transferred to TP - told them were a trustee over ‘some of it’ and gifted them part?
- Transferred to another absolutely?
- If appointed self as trustee but no certainty of PROPERTY, they remain the outright owner
- If transferred to TP - told them were a trustee over ‘some of it’ and gifted them part, not valid trust and TP takes absolutely
- If appointed a trustee but no certainty of individual interests, will hold on a resulting trust for the settlor
3 tests required for certainty of objects in discretionary trusts?
- Given postulant
- Administrative workability
- Capriciousness
GAC - grls and crls
Explain how certainty of objects is demonstrated in fixed interest trusts?
EXAMPLES of what will NOT satisfy objects?Will friends count?
(ie name of the test and what it means)
Complete list test
(could do complete exhaustive list)
requires:
- conceptual certainty
i.e. clear description
- evidential certainty
i.e. sufficient evidence to IDENTIFY who falls within class
(eg we know who bob is, can’t find him - still certain)
IMPORTANT:
- employees but no records - uncertainty
- for 5 grandchildren, 1 missing - conceptually and evidentially CERTAIN (evi certain as we know she does have 5 granchildren) - distribute 1/5 to each and ask court what to do with remainder
- FRIENDS IS NOT CONCEPTUALLY CERTAIN
What is the “given ____ “ for certainty of objects for DISCRETIONARY trusts?
Explain (name of test and what it requires)
‘Given postulant’ test (horrible word)
if u pick up a randomer in ptown centre, would u know with certaity if they are a beneficiary?
- Requires conceptual certainty
(clear description of the class) - DOES not require evidential certainty
(so irrelevant that may be impossible to prove someone falls within class)
(discretionary only)
Discretionary trusts - certainty of objects - explain administrative workability
Administrative workability
If too wide.
Usually because too large so spend so much time and money identifying that nothing left to distribute.
Also if too large to survey so can’t identify whether distributing property is appropriate given competing needs etc.
E.g. all of West Yorkshire
No defined number of beneficiaries - Q of fact of size of class compared to trust fund.
NB: NOT AN ISSUE FOR FIXED TRUSTS!!!
Explain capriciousness and when it is relevant.
capriciousness = rationalness
Certainty of objects test for DISCRETIONARY TRUSTS
If no rational reason for the trust; or
No rational basis for trustees exercise discretion upon
E.g.
Requires to distribute to randomers with no link to settlor
What happens if there is no certainty of objects?
Resulting trust in favour of settlor
What trusts will automatically satisfy beneficiary principle?
(ie be for benefit of individuals)
Express trusts (ie fixed or discretionary)
(just an issue with implied trusts)
If settlor wants to be the trustee themselves, what do they need to do to create that trust?
Literally just make valid declaration
Don’t need to transfer since own equitable and legal title
If a settlor appoints a third party to act as a trustee, when will that trust be constituted?
Valid declaration of trust
Transfer legal title to trust property to trustee
If settlor transferring LAND to a TP to be the trustee, what formalities must be followed?
(remember, transferring legal title)
(omg makes sense why for trust only need WTS cos its equitable!)
- Execute deed
- must state its a deed
- signed by settlor, witnessed and signed by witness - Give executed deed to trustee and either trustee or themselves send to LR
Only takes effect when LR registers as new proprietor
If settlor transferring SHARES to a TP to be the trustee, what formalities must be followed?
Either:
- Within CREST system
- computerised transfer
- public quoted companies only - Outside CREST
- execute stock transfer form; and
- give form and share certificate to trustee or company
Not transferred until title transferred
If settlor transferring MONEY to a TP to be the trustee,
When does transfer take effect?
Legal title transfers when
- If handing over cash, on delivery
- If bank transfer, once lands
- If cheque, once cleared
- if settlor dies before cleared, cheque can’t be
If settlor transferring CHATTELS to a TP to be the trustee, when does the transfer take effect?
Physical delivery
Or deed
Explain ‘equity will not assist a volunteer’?
(beneficiaries are the volunteers)
If settlor not followed correct formalities to transfer, there will be no trust.
nb: there are exceptions
What are the 2 main exceptions tot he maxim that ‘equity will not assist a volunteer’?
- Every effort test
- Rule in Strong v Bird
Explain ‘every effort test’
(exception to equity will not assist a volunteer)
includes where given to someone who would give to the register-er - e.g. given to trustee to register at LR - son hasn’t. still satisfied every effort.
Settlor did everything they could to transfer legal title/passed point of no return
All that remained was action of a TP
If the docs are still in settlor’s possession, not satisfied every effort test.
Equity will regard trust as valid
E.g.:
- transfer legal title to land, settlor executed deed and gave deed to trustee
NOTE:
If settlor didn’t take every effort but unconscionable to back, MAY regard as complete
- involved lifetime gift
- outside scope of manual
(did essay on this at uni)
What is the rule in Strong v Bird
Exception to equity will not assist a volunteer.
If settlor wanted to create trust in lifetime but never got round to transferring legal title to trustee, but intended trustee becomes their executor/administrator
Since PR now has legal title, the original trust could be constituted IF:
- Intended for immediate trust with PR as the trustee;
- Did not transfer due to failure to comply with a relevant transfer rule; and
(will usually be satisfied - e.g. never delivered ring) - Intention continued until death.
(e.g.
Desmond is Chriss executor. Intended STRONG BIRD box on trust to Dad but never transfered. Intended to do so with Desmond as trustee, and intended until death, but never got round to it.)
What must a settlor do if declare themselves AND ANOTHER to be trustees?
Transfer legal title from their sole name to joint names
If made DECLARATION but not transferred, will be UNCONSCIONABLE for trust to fail
so trust is valid and they are duty-bound to transfer
what is capital v income in trusts context
capital = market value, inc any capital gain if inc in value
(remember it as capital gain = capital = no extra)
income = money derived from property on regular basis, eg dividends on shares
examples
- antique desk - no income, capital only
- bank account - balance = capital, interest payments = income
- house - market value = capital, rent = income
absolute vs limited beneficiary
absolute - entitled just capital and income
limited - entitled to just capital
(capital fm limited !)
2 types of interests can a beneficiary have in a FIXED interest trust?
(explain each one and for each, WHAT HAPPENS IF BEN DIES)
- Vested
- unconditional entitlement
- if beneficiary dies before trust property paid to them, will belong to their estate - Contingent
- CONDITIONAL on future event which may not happen
e.g. born
- if die before meet condition, goes back to settlor (unless settlor specified should pass to someone else)
WITHIN those two categories, there are successive interests:
- once someone dies, you get their interest
- e.g. “hold on trust for my wife for life and remainder to son”
Is a standard successive interest vested or contingent?
(eg to my wife for life and remainder to my son)
Vested
- since don’t have to satisfy any conditions
- just means that won’t ordinary receive trust property until the other beneficiary dies
(remember entitled to capital!/s 32!)
(although the settlor can add conditions to make contingent - e.g.should he reach 25)
What is trust interest which is in possession vs postponed?
In possession = can enjoy it now (eg life interest)
Postponed = have to wait until another’s right to enjoyment expires (eg remainderman)
What is interest in remainder/remainderman? (trusts)
Once someone else has died, you get the remaining trust property which has not yet been used
Entitled to capital
If beneficiary of successive trust interest dies before the life tenant, what happens?
Their interest in remainder passes to their estate
Unless settlor created contingent interest in remainder
e.g. remainder to son if reaches 25, and they died when 24
- interest in remainder goes back to settlor on resulting trust
Common name for trusts which create successive interests?
life interest trusts
(nb they are still fixed interest trusts - because settlor still stipulating who receives what and when)
The correct name for potential beneficiaries (ie members of the class prior to distribution of trust property) in a discretionary trust?
Objects
is it possible to combine elements of fixed interest and discretionary trusts within a single trust?
yes
e.g. u could say
“give my shares to Francesca to hold on trust for my wife to life, remainder to such of my children as survive my wife and shares that trustee deems fit”
- wife has a vested interest under fixed interest trust
- children have no vested or contingent interest - subject to them being selected
What is the rule in Saunders v Vautier?
If for my kids who reach age of 25. none reached 25. would come back to me on resulting trust. therefore i have an interest. could not use S v V yet.
(both mean convey trust and therefore end trust):
Bare trust (i.e. sole adult beneficiary w mental capacity + vested):
- can end trust by directing trustees to transfer trust property to them OR other trustees
(assuming other trustees under sep trust)
(extended rule):
group of beneficiaries can do the same, if collectively:
- absolutely entitled;
- over 18;
- agree to proposal; and
- mental capacity
- if the trust has contingent/remainder interests, all those bens must agree
-imp:
if vested, need consent of contingent and successive.
if contingent, need consent of whoever else may be entiled (e.g. settlor’s residary beneficiary if died)
- if agreed a diff split or something which overrides terms of original trust in return for bringing to end, that is permitted
e.g. O only agrees to end in exchange for 50% share of fund - that is fine.
Are purpose trusts fixed interest or discretionary trusts? Are they express?
Express trusts (how else would u know the purpose!)
(need valid declaration and put property into the trust)
fixed interest or discretionary depending on terms.
eg
- “for residents of bath” - for individuals NOT purpose
- “to advance good citizenship amongst relatives” - purpose trust
How does certainty of objects apply for purpose trusts?
The objective (i.e. the purpose) is the object. Not the beneficiaries.
Must be clear what the objective is
Unless it is charitable purpose - as long as purpose is charitable, doesn’t matter how vague
- Charity Commission will work out with trustees what to do with it
How does beneficiary principle apply in relation to purpose trusts?
As a general rule they are void
(since no beneficiary who can take to court)
But doesn’t appy to charitable, Re Denley or imperfect obligation - I.E. THE ONES WE LOOK AT
Explain rule against perpetuities in relation to purpose trusts?
Name of this rule.
(rule against inalienability of CAPITAL)
a) trust last 21 YEARS or less; or
- draft: as long as law allows - presume 21 years.
b) trustees able to spend fund on that specific purpose in one go, thus ending trust
IMPORTANT:
- shouldn’t use income to achieve
- if it says maintain, not valid unless time limited it as ongoing obligation
e.g.
- give 40k, use INCOME generated from that to MAINTAIN changing rooms
^ void, to generate income, have to lock away trust capital
^ if trustees spent the trust fund in one go (ie 40k), nothing left to generate income from, could not fulfil trust
^ and not limited to locking away for 21 years
(so effectively saying lock away capital and use the income to maintain forever)
- 40k to spend on BUILD changing rooms
- not requiring use of income
- even tho not time limited, can use in one go
(nb: 125 years for individuals. unlikely any these days will offend)
which 2 principles DONT apply to charitable trusts?
beneficiary principle
rule against inalienability of capital
To be valid, charitable trusts must satisfy what 3 conditions?
- Charitable purpose;
- Public benefit; and
- Exclusively charitable.
CPE. T shelb CPE. p for pol.
What counts as a ‘charitable purpose’ for charitable trust to be valid?
Explain each one.
At least one of following:
- Poverty
- not destitution but ‘go short’ - Religion
- more than philosophical discussions about if god exists (will k)
- trust must take positive steps to sustain and increase religious belief
e.g. distributing religious publications - Education
- inc research as long as useful and published
- eg scholarships, building educational facilities, paying school staff
When will a charitable trust have a ‘public benefit’?
- Identifiable benefits
- must relate to purpose of charity
- detriments must be outweighed by benefit
eg no school for pickpockets - Sufficiently large section public
- tests differ depending on charitable purpose
(separate queue card)
Explain how requirement for ‘public benefit’ apply to the three purposes of charitable trusts?
Describe each.
- Prevention or relief of poverty
- GROUP fine. but not named
- ‘my family’ fine.
- george and ella not. - Advancement of religion
If:
- place of worship open to all; or
- members of congregation mix with rest of society
(so no if closed off cult) - Education and other charitable purposes
- must not be v small number of beneficiaries and tests:
a) personal nexus
b) class within a class
c) not exclude the poor
(sep queue card)
Explain tests for educational (or other charitable purpose aside from religion/poverty)
to satisfy the ‘public benefit’ test?
this is a write down situ
- personal nexus
- not linked reli to individual or company
(e.g. kids of employees of Red Anchor) - class within a class test
- class and benefit must add up
- limiting by location is fine
(e.g. building care home for prestoners)
(eg promoting sports to people in Preston who are methodists - no rationale why only Methodists benefit from sport) - can’t exclude the poor
- can charge fees on use as long as profits ploughed back purpose
- not excessively high fees
eg bursaries, sharing facilities, higher fees
Explain the two aspects of a trust being ‘exclusively charitable’?
- no political purpose; and
- if charge fees, profits must be ploughed back into trust
(can’t give fees to private individuals)
can’t have part charitable and part non charitable purpose
(eg mixture charitable and political)
Can charitable trust be political?
General rule is cannot have political purpose of any form.
Can’t support political party or campaign for change of law in UK or abroad.
e.g. can’t campaign for release of prisoners
BUT can engage in political activities which are incidental to their main purpose
eg Oxfam can persuade Govs to remove infrastructure which may help eradicate poverty
When may a non-charitable purpose trust still be valid?
(despite general rule that can’t be because offends perpetuities and beneficiary principle)
- Re Denley
- purpose secures tangible benefit for ascertainable group of individuals - Trusts of imperfect obligation
- eg to maintain specific animals (eg pet) graves or monuments
When will there be a valid Re Denley trust?
Declaration identifies people who will benefit from particular purpose
(so overcomes beneficiary principle)
Must be:
- Clear purpose with sufficiently tangible benefit
- Ascertainable beneficiaries
- given postulant test - Not offend inalienability of capital
- 21 years or able to spend all capital on purpose
e.g.
- 500k to spend on building gym for employees of XYZ satisfies this
- 500k for maintaining gym doesn’t
(inalienability)
Explain ‘trusts of imperfect obligation’.
Inc what happens if not enforced properly.
(Rory is imperfect but I love him 🐶)
Allow non-charitable purpose trusts to be valid.
Mainly for trusts to:
- maintain a specific animal, monument or grave
No human beneficiary obvs but we love animals and monuments so valid
Must still comply with inalienability of capital
Unenforceable by beneficiary but settlor or their residuary beneficiary can go to court to claim trust property if trustee not spend properly.
e.g. enforceable:
“500k to look after dog Max for as long as law allows”
- valid - specific animal and limits to 21 years
When will PRESUMPTION of resulting trust arise?
- Voluntary transfer of PERSONALTY which they already own
(no consideration. not land)
e.g. Mike £100 to his gf Sally
(sounds daft but easily rebutted) - Voluntary transfer of land if additional evidence
e.g. they are strangers so obvs not a gift - Buys property for another ‘purchase money cases’
- purchase but arranges to put in name of another
e.g. Jack pays, asks seller put in Abigail’s name
- Jack holds equitable interest under resulting trust and Abigail has legal title
raises presumption that intended to keep some or all of the beneficial interest for themselves
(unless advancement applies instead cos 🤦♂️)
nb: rebuttable
r for resulting, r for rebuttable
What happens with legal title and equitable title under a resulting trust?
Transferee holds legal title in full
Transferor holds equitable title proportionate to the amount they contributed if purchase money
(or obvs if they owned the whole thing like gave a vase it would just be that own whole equitable itnerest)
Will there be a presumption of resulting trust where there is a voluntary transfer of LAND?
nb: not personalty
Only if there is some other evidence
eg transferor and transferee are strangers suggests presumption of resulting trust
Presumption doesn’t arise purely from fact of voluntary transfer
What is a purchase money resulting trust?
How much equitable interest will transferor get?
Where purchases property from seller and arranges for property to be in name of another, presumption of resulting trust arises
Also if contributes to PP of property in name of Y
Applies personalty and realty
Get whole or part of equitable interest if paid part
If X contributed towards purchase price of property (which is conveyed into name of Y) and Y paid remainder, what will the presumption be?
(nb Y is the one who gets legal title)
That X intended Y to hold on resulting trust for X and Y
The size of their beneficial interests will be based on their respective
e.g.
- me and H buy holiday home
- I contribute 100k, H pays 10k of PP
- House conveyed into my name
- I own legal title but we both hold equitable title under respective shares
- I hold on resulting trust for H
- If sell in future, H gets 10% purchase price
Does presumption of purchase money resulting trust apply to purchases of personalty, realty or both?
Both
Conditions for presumption that contribution towards purchase monies = resulting trust to apply?
- Contemporaneous
(contributed at time of purchase) - Contributed to actual purchase price
(eg if house purchase - not count if just paid legal fees)
(so baso i directly paid towards purchase price at time of purchase)
Effect of presumption of advancement?
i.e. presumption of GIFT
No resulting trust and transferor presumed to be gifting property to transferee
(so retain no equitable title)
When does presumption of advancement apply?
- Father to child (minor or adult)
-
Loco parentis to child under 18
i.e. guardian who responsible for providing financially to child
(even if not male) - Husband to wife
- Male fiancé to female fiancé, as long as eventually marry
not grandparents
How can presumptions of advancement and resulting trust be rebutted?
Evidence that had diff intention before or at time of transfer
Evidence of intention AFTER transfer can only be used against you
e.g. rebut advancement by evidence that wanted recipient to re-pay - would replace with resulting trust
e.g. rebut resulting trust by birthday card
Who is burden of proof on to rebut presumption of resulting trust or advancement?
The party who is seeking to rebut it
(seems obvs but imp lol)
What are automatic resulting trusts?
i.e. when does it arise and what is effect
Settlor transfers property to trustees, who do not dispose of all or part of equitable interest
(bcos trust is void OR does not exhaust the fund)
Equitable interest goes back to settlor via resulting trust
Would be bare trust, Saunders v Vautier, could use to get trustees to transfer legal title back
(call ‘automatic resulting trusts’ to distinguish from those which arise from presumptions)
Circumstances where automatic trust may arise?
(i.e. where equitable interest may not have been disposed of in its entirety)
Trust void in full or part or doesn’t dispose of all of the fund
(helpful - remember equity requires someone to always hold the equitable interest)
- conditional interest never vested
e.g. died before reached 25 - Lacks certainty of objects
(eg my besties!) - Lack certainty subject matter
(eg not distinguished. sarah pick first.)
etc etc
Are formalities required for resulting trust?
No as it is a form of implied trust
(and statute clear that implied trust can be created w/o any formalities)
If relationship ENDS, how will family home be dealt with if married couple vs cohabiting?
re equitable interest:
Married
- divorce order can quantify beneficial interests, regardless of whether created express trust when purchased home
Cohabiting
- follow valid express trust
- or if not, implied trust
What makes a resulting trust of family home often unfair?
Only applies to monetary, contemporaneous contributions to purchase price.
So the following don’t give rise to a resulting trust
(meaning that party loses equitable interest):
- Payments towards mortgage
(although payment towards deposit does count) - Non-monetary contributions
e.g. childcare, improvements - Ancillary payments e.g. stamp duty, legal fees and bills
(so we usually use common intention constructive trusts)
If partners registered co-proprietors (legal title jointly owned), what is presumption if no express trust?
Name for this type of trust?
Assuming no express trust
If co-proprietors, hold legal title jointly and equally
“Equity follows the law”
This is the initial version of CICT.
Can rebut.
In a jointly owned fam home (JT), howcan a partner claim a higher share than default (ie joint and equal) via CICT?
- AGREEMENT OR common INTENTION that entitled to greater share; and
- Detrimentally relied on that agreement/intention .
If arguing intention, court considers ‘whole course of dealing.
Will be unusual for court to find intended unequal shares.
What may court consider in assessing ‘whole course of dealing’ for common intention constructive trust / unequal shares?
used to quantify shares once found that there is a CICT
- Advice/discussions at time of purchase
- Why in joint names?
- Arranged finances separately?
- Nature of reli
- Children who must provide home for?
(was one responsible for childcare?) - How financed property?
- How paid outgoings?
Unequal contributions to purchase price unlikely to show unequal shares.
Under what type of trust can partner seek to claim beneficial interest in a solely owned family home?
What burden will they have?
Common intention constructive trust
They have burden of proving beneficial interest
Two stages that must be followed for common intention constructive trust?
- Establish that a common intention constructive trust exists
(presumed if jointly owned) - Quantify beneficial interests
How can non-owning partner claim that common intention constructive trust EXISTS?
- common INTENTION that both have an interest; and
(inferred or express) - DETRIMENTALLY RELIED on that intention
Two ways establishing common intention for CICT?
imp
- Express common intention and detrimental reliance
- oral or written agreement that both have interest
- sufficient:
“as much yours as is mine” - but for bank’s advice, would have in joint names
- insufficient:
“finish the lease and move in” (doesn’t address ownership)
- Inferred common intention and detrimental reliance
- couple’s conduct, usually:
(a) direct contribution to PP
(b) signif mortgage repayments
(c) paying household expenses which allows other party to pay mortgage
following won’t count:
- loans
- refurbishishments sorry dwye!
- incidental to PP - e.g. legal fees
What will be valid detrimental reliance to establish common intention constructive trust?
Option 1: Express common intention + DR
- financial contributions - eg alterations
- substantial housekeeping expenses
- domestic might (less clear-cut)
Option 2: Inferred + DR
- can only infer from financial anyway (non-monetary don’t suffice for inferred)
- so will automatically satisfy DR
How do courts quantify shares in common intention constructive trust?
If partners agree, follow that
Otherwise, WHOLE COURSE OF DEALING
(as per earlier card - e.g. how finance/any kids/expenses/advice on purchase/why joint names)
Two main ways a partner can establish beneficial interest in family home if there is no express trust?
- Common intention constructive trust
- Proprietary estoppel
(not resulting trust - wouldn’t establish that would be presumed)
2 stages to bringing a proprietary estoppel claim?
- Estoppel must be established (ie ADR)
- Estoppel must be satisfied (i.e. remedies)
3 elements to establishing a claim in proprietary estoppel?
ADR
Assurance
Detriment
Reliance
When will assurance have been made for purposes of proprietary estoppel?
Legal owner made representation or created expectation that would become entitled to interest in land.
Either:
(a) active
- i.e. tells have interest
(b) passive
- conduct clearly suggests
- legal owner must have known yet never told claiming party otherwise