Trustees: powers and duties Flashcards
What is the difference between trustee powers, trustee duties and fiduciary duties?
- Trustee powers = what a trustee may do
- Trustee duties = what a trustee must do
- Fiduciary duties = what a trustee must not do
What are the 2 sources of trustee powers and duties? How do they work together?
- Trust instrument contains express provisions setting out powers/duties (modifies default statutory rules)
- Trustee Act 1925 and Trustee Act 2000 (default rules which can be modified by instrument)
What are the 2 categories of powers and duties?
- Administrative - management of trust property while it is held on trust e.g. investment, delegation, buy and sell property, change trust property
- Dispositive - distribution of trust property in accordance with its terms e.g. power of appointment, maintenance, advancement
What does it mean that the Ts role is custodial in nature?
Ts have obligation to safeguard the trust property i.e. produces income and capital growth
Hence administrative powers
How are T’s administrative powers curtailed?
Curtailed by associated duties - in accordance with prescribed standard of care and skill
E.g. power of investment under duty to seek advice etc.
What if there are no express administrative powers in the trust instrument?
There are default powers in Trustee Act 2000 - should check whether they have been amended/excluded
How will a T breach the trust?
Acting outside their powers or failing to comply with duties
Are Ts under an obligation to provide Bs with reasons for the way they have exercised their powers?
No
What 3 default powers are set out in the Trustee Act?
More are set out - just focusing on these ones
- General power of investment (s3)
- Power to acquire land (s8)
- Power of delegation (s11)
What is the T’s general power of investment?
As if they were…
T may make any kind of investment they could make if they were absolutely entitled to assets of the trust
What 2 things must Ts consider when exercising the general power of investment? Are these set in stone?
- The standard investment criteria (s4)
- Taking advice (s5)
These duties can be restricted, excluded or extended and must act in accordance with general DOC when exercising
At what 2 points do Ts have a duty to consider the standard investment criteria?
When deciding whether to make investment in first place and when regularly reviewing investments to decide whether they should be varied
What are the 2 key components of the standard investment criteria?
- Suitability - of proposed investments
- Diversification - the need to diversify investments (extent necessary depends on size/nature of particular trust)
What are the two key questions when considering suitability of investment?
- General suitability - is investment of a suitable kind?
- Specific suitability - is particular invstment suitable?
Highly fact-specific; suitable for 1 trust fund may not be for other
What duties are balanced when determining the suitability of an investment?
In terms of the trust property
The key duty to preserve trust assets against need to produce appropriate growth
What key issues should be considered when deciding suitability of investment?
3 things
- Size of trust fund
- Period of time for which trust intended to subsist
- Respective rights of different B
E.g. large commercial trust fund (great degree of freedom and long-term growth) v small family trust (short period)
What should the T make sure to do when investing for trusts that include both a life and remainder interest?
Ensure that investments produce income for life tenant and capital growth for remainderman; must act even-handedly between Bs
What is required by diversification from the standard investment criteria? Is it the same for all funds?
What theory?
That investments reflect modern portfolio theory: investing across range of different types so not overly exposed to risk of losses in one sector
Again fact-specific; larger and smaller funds will differ
What does the diversification requirement ultimately allow Ts to do?
Invest in mixture of high and low risk investments, rather than exclusively low risk (and probably low yield) investments
Should small trust funds still diversify?
Yes - may not be able to diversify in same way as a larger commercial fund but should consider investing in investment funds (pool assets of multiple investors and allow them to obtain benefit of diversification)
Are the ‘best interests’ of B - which Ts should act on behalf of when considering suitability of investments - restrained to financial interests?
- Generally ‘best interests’ of Bs will mean best financial interests
- But can be construed more widely to account for moral/ethical concerns where Bs are all adults/sound mind/agree (but this will be rare)
E.g. Bs do not wish to benefit from immoral/unethical investment
Do current or future Bs take priority when considering investments?
Must balance the interests of both
Are personal views of Ts relevant to assessment of investment?
No - must exercise powers fairly and honestly and for no ulterior purpose
E.g. Cowan v Scargill - Ts were part of National Union of Mineworkers who did not want to invest in oil or overseas despite investments being permitted by the trust - court held that obligation of Ts was to produce best financial return for trust fund (to preserve value of pensions of current and future members of pension scheme)
Does that mean moral and ethical concerns will be completely irrelevant to T decisions?
No…
- Ts can still prefer ethical investments if they have a choice of economical equivalence
- Ethical views of Bs - who are of sound mind and all agree - also make it okay
How are non-financial interests considered in the case of charitable trusts?
- Charitable Ts may refrain from investments that might conflict with aim of charity/hamper its work e.g. Ts of cancer research charity would not invest in tobacco industry even if most profitable
- Ts required to balance risk to charity of financial loss from not making ivnestment against the disadvantages to charity of making investment
Are Ts bound to follow the advice they receive on investments? To what extent can they ignore?
No - but can only ignore if they consider a reasonably prudent T would act in the same way; cannot ignore simply because they disagree
What must Ts consider before exercising powers of investment and when reviewing their investments?
‘Proper advice’ as per s5
What is meant by ‘proper advice’ in s5?
Advice provided by a person who is reasonably trusted by T to be qualified to give it by their ability in and practical experience of financial and other matters relating to the proposed investment
When will it be permissible for Ts to not obtain advice?
Where it is unecessary to do so e.g. where cost of advice outweighs benefits of obtaining it (T may have sufficient knowledge/expertise to make decision without it)
How does the statutory duty of care - found in s1 of the Trustee Act - impact on how certain Ts must act in their role? Will lay Ts always be held to a lay T standard?
‘Exercise such care and skill as is reasonable in the circumstances’
- Professional Ts held to higher standard of care as they are being paid
- Lay Ts will be held to higher standard if they have been appointed on the basis of having (or purporting to have) particular skills that would make them desirable Ts
So it is important for people to decide whether to take on role!!
How does the common law duty of care apply differently to the statutory one? What is expected from Ts?
Applies more broadly; requires Ts to exercise standard of diligence and care expected of an ordinary prudent business person