Trust 9 - Family homes Flashcards
What is required for an express trust of the family home
- agreement evidenced in writing
- Land Reg TR1 form has a section on it
What are common intention constructive trusts?
Mechanism for determining beneficial ownership, reflecting common intention of the parties
Common intention can either be express or inferred
Do purchase funds resulting trusts apply to the family home
No - a holistic approach is used using Common Intention Constructive Trusts
What is the starting presumption for trusts of family homes?
Beneficial ownership of land mirrors legal ownership
What is the assumption in Joint Tenancy cases
Own the property in equal shares
What must be done to establish that legal title and equitable title is different in Joint Tenancy cases?
- Rebut the presumption of equal shares
- quantify the shares of the parties
How is the presumption of equal shares in a joint tenancy rebutted?
- looking at whole course of conduct.
- requires heavy burden requiring unusual facts
- with reference to common intention
- either express or inferred
- don’t need to show reliance
What factors are considered when determining common intention?
‘Whole course of conduct’
- Advice or discussions (best evidence)
- Reason legal title was registered in particular names
- Purpose for acquiring house
- Nature of relationship
- If parties have children
- Financing of home
- Arrangement of finances and divided responsibility
Joint tenancies - Once common intention that property should be held as tenants in common is found, what must the courts do next?
Interests must be quantified
Joint tenancies - Once common intention that property how are interests quantified?
- express intention of parties, if not
- implied by parties’ conduct
- impute an intention for ‘fair shares’ based on whole course of conduct as a last resort
What are the cases on Joint Tenancies
- mother and son bought house in joint names as M needed S’s name on the mortgage - no Joint tenancy
- bought house as a couple, split up, cashed in life policy, he moved out for 14 yrs not contributing further - intention had changed therefore no longer joint tenants his interest crystallised when he moved out.
Where a property was purchased in joint names and both contributed but kept their finances otherwise completely separate, what was held?
It was indicative that they didn’t want a beneficial JT or to have equal shares