Tribunals and ADR Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are tribunals?

A
  • forums deciding on certain types of dispute.
    -less formal than court
    -set up for normal people to appear without legal representation.
  • operate alongside the court system and have become an important part of the legal system.
  • parties in a tribunal case cannot go to court to resolve their dispute.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the role of tribunals?

A
  • enforce rights granted through social welfare legislation
  • the right to a mobility allowance for those who are too disabled to walk
  • payment if one is made redundant
  • not to be discriminated against
  • immigrants to have a claim for political asylum heard.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the composition of tribunals?

A
  • first tier tribunals heard by ‘tribunal judge’
  • for some cases two ‘non-lawyers’ will sit with the judge, they will have expertise in the particular field of the tribunal and are known as ‘tribunal members’
  • tribunal members take an equal part in the decisions made but are advised on points of law by the judge.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the procedure in tribunals?

A
  • both sides have opportunity to put their case
  • this can be with witnesses giving evidence
  • most applicants will not have a lawyer but present their own case
  • the tribunal judge must make sure the case is put forward properly.
  • the decision of the tribunal is binding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an employment tribunals?

A
  • statutory jurisdiction to hear kinds of disputes between employers and employees.
  • established in the industrial training act but are now governed by a mixture of primary and secondary legislation.
  • the most common disputes deal with unfair dismissal, redundancy payments and employment discrimination.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the process in employment tribunals?

A
  • claim has to be made within three months of the event
  • must first inform the advisory conciliation and arbitration service
  • once informed they will encourage both parties to settle making use of their ‘early conciliation’
  • once informed ACAS they must submit the ET1 claims form. defendant then has 28 days to respond.
  • preliminary hearing conducted to decide whether claim can go ahead, when and how long it will take.
  • there are three members of the tribunal, an employment judge, a person representing employers organisations and one for employees organisations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the appeals process of employment tribunals?

A
  • have their own appeals route
  • can go to employment appeal tribunal if a legal mistake was made for example got the law wrong, not applied law correctly, not followed correct procedures, no evidence to support decision or unfairly biased to other party.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is ADR?

A
  • any method of solving a dispute without resorting to using the courts. there are many different methods which can be used ranging from informal negotiations between the parties to a formal commercial arbitration hearing.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is negotiation?

A
  • negotiating directly with them.
  • completely private process and is quick and cheap
  • they may decide to instruct solicitors who will try to negotiate a settlement
  • even when court proceedings have commenced, lawyers will continue to negotiate on behalf of their clients reflected in high number of cases settled out of court.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the advantages of negotiation?

A
  • cheapest and quickest way to solve a dispute
  • can include agreement about future business deals.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the disadvantages of negotiation?

A
  • it may not be successful to other forms have to be used
  • it is not suitable for antagonistic parties not prepared to ‘co-operate’
  • if there are repeating unsuccessful attempts it may prolong the whole issue.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is mediation?

A
  • a neutral mediator helps to reach a compromise solution.
    -they consult each party and see how much common ground there is
  • they will carry offers to and fro keeping confidentiality
  • they will not tell the parties their own views of the merits of the dispute however they can be asked where they become more of an evaluation exercise which again aims at ending the dispute
  • mediation is only suitable if there is some hope that the parties can co-operate
    -parties in a family case have to show they attended a mediation information and assessment meeting before court proceeds.
  • the important point is the parties are in control and make the decisions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are examples of mediation services?

A
  • one of the main ones for business disputes is centre for effective dispute resolution.
  • CEDR reported 10,000 commercial mediations in 12 months involving 10.5 billion pounds worth of commercial mediations and use of this saved an estimated 2.8 billion pounds.
  • west Sussex mediation service offers help for disputes between neighbours to resolve disagreements arising from such matters as noise, car-parking, dogs or boundary fence dispute.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is conciliation?

A
  • similar to mediation except the neutral third part take a more pro active role
  • the conciliator discusses issues with both sides to help them reach a better understanding and also they suggest grounds for compromise and the possible basis for settlement.
  • in industrial disputes the advisory council and arbitration service can give an impartial opinion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the advantages of mediation and conciliation?

A
  • the parties are in control and can withdraw at any point
  • the decision need not be strictly legal sticking to the letter of the law and is more likely to stick to common sense.
  • makes it easier for companies to do business with each other in the future and may include agreements about the conduct of future business between parties.
  • they avoid the adversarial conflict of the court room, everyone wins.
  • over 80% of cases in which the centre for dispute resolution has been asked to act have been settled.
  • parties were more likely to settle without going to court
  • issues may have at least been clarified therefore any court hearing will be shorter.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the disadvantages of mediation and conciliation?

A
  • requires a skilled third party who if not properly skilled can become a bullying exercise in which the weaker party may be forced into settlement
  • amounts paid are often lower than amounts agreed in other settlements and considerably lower than amounts awarded.
17
Q

What is private arbitration?

A
  • governed by the arbitration act 1996
  • the object of arbitration is to obtain fair resolution of dispute by an impartial tribunal and parties free to agree how their disputes are resolved.
  • voluntary submission by the parties, of their dispute, to the judgement of some person other than a judge.
18
Q

What is the agreement to arbitrate?

A
  • agreement can be made at anytime
  • many commercial contracts include a Scott v Avery clause where in the event of a dispute arising between them they will have that dispute settled by arbitration
  • arbitration act states the court will normally refuse to deal with any dispute
19
Q

What is the arbitrator?

A
  • parties free to agree on the number of arbitrators.
  • if parties cannot agree on an a number then one shall be appointed
  • parties are also free to agree on the procedure for appointing an arbitrator
  • there is also the institute of arbitrators providing in major disputes.
  • in many cases it will be someone who has expertise in the particular field involved.
  • the court can be asked to appoint an appropriate arbitrator as a last resort.
20
Q

What is the arbitration hearing?

A
  • the actual procedure is left to the agreement of the parties in each case.
  • in some cases they may opt for a ‘paper’ arbitration where they put points into writing and submit it.
  • alternatively they may send all the documents to the arbitrator but before they make a decision they will attend a hearing making oral submissions with if necessary witnesses.
  • if witnesses are called the arbitration act 1996 allows for the use of court procedures to ensure the attendance of witnesses.
  • date, time and place are all matters for the parties to decide in consultation with the arbitrator.
  • greater degree of flexibility.
21
Q

What is the award?

A
  • the decision made is called the ‘award’ and is binding on the parties
  • can be enforced through courts
  • usually final although can be challenged in the courts on the grounds of serious irregularity in the proceedings or point of law.
22
Q

What are the advantages of arbitration?

A
  • parties may choose their own arbitrator therefore deciding whether it is best dealt with technical expert, lawyer or professional arbitrator.
  • if there is a question of quality it can be decided by an expert in the particular field saving expenses of calling expert witness and time saved not having to explain technicalities.
  • matter is dealt with in private with no publicity good for businesses saving their representation.
  • the award is normally final and can be enforced through the courts.
23
Q

What are the disadvantages of arbitration?

A
  • unexpected legal point may arise which is not suitable for decision by a non-lawyer arbitrator
  • professional arbitrator fees may be expensive
  • will be expensive if parties opt for formal hearing with witnesses giving evidence and lawyers
  • rights of appeal are limited
  • delays for commercial and international can be nearly as great as those in courts.
  • has lost its popularity with companies as a method if resolution because of delay and expense.