Tribunals (ADR) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Where to tribunals operate?

A

Tribunals originate alongside the court system and have become an important part of the legal system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why were tribunals created?

A

They were created in order to give people a method of enforcing their entitlement to certain social rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Could the parties go to court?

A

Unlike ADR, where the parties decide not to use the courts, the parties in tribunal cases cannot go to court to resolve their dispute.
The tribunal must be used instead of court proceeding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tribunals enforce rights which have been granted through?

A

which have been granted through social and welfare legislation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give a list of rights?

A

The right to a mobility allowance for those who are disabled to walk more than a short distance;
The right to a payment if someone is made redundant;
The right not to be discriminated against because of a person’s race, age, sex or disability; and
The right of immigrants to have a claim for political asylum heard.
There are many other issues a tribunal can hear but these are the main ones.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the system before the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007? How many different tribunals were there?

A

Tribunals were set up as the welfare state developed.
This meant that new developments in welfare resulted in the creation of new tribunals.
Eventually there were more than 70 different types of tribunal.
Each tribunal was separate and the various tribunals used different procedures.
This made the system confused and complicated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 do?

A

The whole system was reformed by the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.
This created a unified structure for tribunals, with a First-tier Tribunal to hear cases of first instance and an Upper Tribunal to hear appeals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How many cases does the First-Tier Tribunals hear and how many people work there?

A

The First-Tier Tribunal deals with about 300,000 cases each year and has nearly 200 judges and 3,600 lay members.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How many chambers (divisions) does the First-Tier Tribunal have?

A

7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The Social Entitlement Chamber (`1)

A

this covers a wide range of matters such as child support, criminal injuries compensation and gender recognition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The Health, Education and Social Care Chamber (1)

A

this includes the former Mental Health Review Tribunal which dealt with appeals against the continued detention of those in mental hospitals. This Chamber also deals with special educational needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the other 5 chambers (1)?

A
The War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber.
The General Regulatory Chamber.
The Taxation Chamber. 
The Land, Property and Housing Chamber.
The Asylum and Immigration Chamber.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

As well as these, there is one tribunal which still operates separately from the First-Tier Tribunal, what is it?

A

Employment Tribunal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The Upper Tribunal is separated into how many chambers?

A

4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the four chambers for the Upper Tribunal? What does the Administrative Appeals Chmaber do?

A

The Administrative Appeals Chamber, which hears appeals from the Social Entitlement Chamber, the Health, Education and Social Care Chamber and the War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber.

The Tax and Chancery Chamber.
The Lands Chamber
The Asylum and Immigration Chamber

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

From the Upper Tribunal there is a further possible appeal route to where?

A

To the Court of Appeal and from there to the Supreme Court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Who hears cases in the First-Tier and what is the exception to that?

A

Cases in the First-Tier Tribunal are heard by a Tribunal Judge.
Also, for some types of case, two lay members will sit with a judge to make the decision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

For the First-Tier lay members will they have expertise?

A

Yes, these lay members will have expertise in the particular field of the tribunal, e.g. the lay members in a hearing about a claim for mobility allowance would be medically qualified, or in the Lands Tribunal the lay people will be surveyor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Who will hear the cases in the Employment Tribunal-the lay members?

A

In employment tribunals there will be two lay members - usually one person from an employee’s organisation and one from an employer’s organisation. This gives them a very clear understanding of employment issues.

20
Q

(1) Both sides must be given the opportunity to do what?

A

Both sides must be given an opportunity to put their case.

21
Q

In the First-Tier is the procedure formal or informal?

A

In some tribunals, especially employment and asylum tribunals, this will be done in a formal way with the witness giving evidence on oath and being cross-examined.
Other tribunals will operate in a less formal way.

22
Q

Is funding available? (1)

A

Funding for representation is available in only a few tribunals, so most applicants will not have a lawyer, but will present their own case.

Legal aid is available for cases where fundamental human rights are involved, e.g. asylum seekers wish to stay in the UK or whether a mental patient should remain in a secure hospital.

23
Q

Where the applicant is putting their own case forward, what must the judge do?

A

The Tribunal Judge must try to make sure that the applicant puts the case fully.

24
Q

Is the decision of a tribunal binding?

A

Yes.

25
Q

What are the advantages of a tribunal?

A

Tribunals were set up to prevent overloading the court with extra cases that social and welfare claims generate.

For the applicant in tribunal cases, the advantages are that such cases are dealt with:
More cheaply;
More quickly;
More informally; and
By experts in the area
26
Q

Why is a cost an advantage?

A

As applicants are encouraged to represent themselves and not use lawyers, tribunal hearings do not normally involve costs associated with court hearings.
It is also rare for an order of costs to be made by a tribunal, so that an applicant need not fear a large bill if they lose the case.

27
Q

Why is quick hearings an advantage? Why are Employment Tribunals different?

A

Most tribunal hearings are very short and can be dealt with in a day.
Employment Tribunals are slightly different and can take several days, sometimes two week.

28
Q

Why is informality an advantage?

A

The hearing is more informal than in court.

Parties are encouraged to present their own case. In addition, most cases are heard in private.

29
Q

Why is expertise an advantage?

A

In some tribunals two lay members sit to hear the case with the Tribunal Judge.
These lay members are experts in the type of case being heard.
This gives them good knowledge and understanding of the issue in dispute.

30
Q

Disadvantages of Tribunals- why is lack of funding a disadvantage? Is legal aid ever available?

A

Public funding is not available for most tribunals, which may put an applicant at a disadvantage if the other side (often an employer or government department) uses a lawyer.
Legal aid is available for cases where fundamental human rights are involved, e.g. asylum seekers wish to stay in the UK or whether a mental patient should remain in a secure hospital.

31
Q

Disadvantages of Tribunals- why is delay a disadvantage?

A

Although the intention is that cases dealt with by tribunals mean that there can be delays in getting a hearing.
The use of lay members can add to this problem as they sit part-time, usually one day a fortnight.
If a case is complex, lasting several days, this can lead to proceedings being spread over a number of weeks or even months.

32
Q

Disadvantages of Tribunals- why is more formal than ADR a disadvantage?

A

A tribunal hearing is more formal than using ADR.
The place is unfamiliar and the procedure can be confusing for individuals presenting their own cases.
Where applicants are not represented, the judge is expected to take an inquisitorial role and help establish the points that the applicant wishes to make.
But this ideal is not always achieved.

33
Q

What is ODR?

A

Online Dispute Resolution.

34
Q

Give examples of ODR? Who has developed it and how?

A

Digital age led to companies developing online dispute resolution.
Ebay
Resolver
Financial Ombudsman Service.

35
Q

Why is the fact ODR is more flexible/easy to use/ easier/ informal (freedom) an advantage?

A

The main advantage of ODR is that people can do it from their own home. With the ever-increasing use of computers, the majority of people are used to doing things online. Many sites also help the user by giving prompts and choices so that the issues are explained clearly. Everyone can get justice they deserve as no legal knowledge is really needed necessarily.

36
Q

Why is cost for ODR an advantage?

A

For some sites, the use of ODR is free. Even where there is a charge it is likely to be a set amount and known to the parties at the beginning of the process. There are no hidden costs. There is also no use of lawyers which reduces the costs in bringing the dispute forward.

37
Q

Why is lack of travel and convenience/ freedom/ flexibility advantage, especially for businesses?

A

Where the dispute involves people in different countries, ODR is a very convenient way of resolving a dispute. No one has to travel, and the saving of costs is considerable. For the many businesses that now operate worldwide, ODR is an important development in dispute resolution.

38
Q

Why is the limited conditions/ scope for ODR a disadvantage?

A

ODR is only suitable for certain types of dispute. It is particularly useful where the issue is about a contract, as with eBay where all the disputes are related to contracts made to buy and sell on eBay.
It is not suitable for claims relating to personal injury and other tortious matters. In such cases it is often necessary to decide who is telling the truth and face-to-face questioning is more effective than online.

39
Q

Why is co-operation, and flexibility a disadvantage?

A

The parties must accept the decision, otherwise it may still be necessary to start court proceedings. If the parties are hostile to one another or they are unwilling to co-operate, the use of ODR will be redundant and the courts would need to get involved.

40
Q

Why is optionality a disadvantage?

A

The use of ODR is optional in most instances, and due to the parties maintaining control, it allows them to reject any resolution and prolong the issue.

41
Q

Who proposed the idea of online courts and when?

A

In 2016 it was proposed that there should be an online court.
The proposal by Lord Briggs followed the publication of a report. ‘Online Dispute Resolution for Low Value Claims,’ by the online dispute advisory group of the Civil Justice Council.

42
Q
They said that all low-value claims dealt with by the court would be:
Cost?
Accessibility?
Time?
Predictable?
Proportionate?
Binding or not?
A

Affordable by minimising costs and implementing fixed fees;
Accessible to all, making sure the process was easy to follow and that people could represent themselves without the use of lawyers;
Speedy by ensuring a quick resolve;
Consistent and predictable meaning cases would be dealt with in the same way;
Proportionate in terms of cost vs value of claim; and
Final, making sure that that the decision was binding.

43
Q

What was stage one?

A

A largely automated, interactive online process for the identification of the issues and the provision of documentary evidence.

44
Q

What was stage two?

A

Conciliation and case management carried out by case managers.

45
Q

What was stage three?

A

If the case is not resolved by stage 2, then there would be resolution by a judge. For this the online court would use documents on screen, telephone video or face-to-face meetings according to the needs of each case.

46
Q

What was the main intention of the proposal?

A

The intention is that cases would be dealt with more quickly and at a lower cost.

47
Q

What happened in 2019 to the Bill, what was the aim and what became of it?

A

In 2019 the Courts and Tribunals (Online Procedure) Bill was introduced in the House of Lords. The aim of this Bill is to provide online procedures in the Civil and Family Courts and Employment Tribunals. The Bill is currently at the Report Stage in the House of Commons.