Trials Flashcards
hypo: when you have a number of similar lawsuits, involving similar but not the same issues of law and fact
ex: lawsuits against city for imposing new tax
in pursuit of consistent judgement and judicial efficiency, all similar cases will be moved to the same Section or Division in which the first filed action is pending
“consolidation of trials”
consolidation of trials will not be done if:
if consolidation will cause jury confusion
if consolidation would prevent a fair and impartial trial
give one party an undue advantage
or prejudice the rights of any party
a court may order seperate trials in order to
determine liability or damages
with consent of parties
if it will simplify the proceedings, permit more orderly disposition of case, or otherwise be in interest of justice.
2 mandatory continuance ciricumstances
the court must grant a continuance if the parties are unable, with due diligence, to obtain material evidence
a court must grant a continuance
if a material witness has absented himself without the contrivance of the party requesting the continuance.
then, adverse party can prevent continuance by requiring the requesting party to disclose under oath the expected testimony of the absent witness
and if the adverse party admits the witness would so testify, the case will proceed to trial
how to get objected-to evidence into the record anyway
this is when at trial, a voice objection is sustained
the party whose evidence was successfully objected to may make an offer of proof
this evidence is excluded from the trial but is in the appellate review record
at party’s request, court may allow excluded evidence to be offered subject to cross examination (1) on the record during a recess or (2) by deposition within 30 days of conclusion of trial.
voluntary dismissal rule
plaintiff can obtain a voluntary dismissal without prejudice prior to any appearance of record by the defendant; following any appearance by the defendant, court may decline to grant dismissal e except with prejudice
valid motion to involuntary dismissal trigger
in an action tried without a jury:
any party can move for an involuntary dismissal after close of plaintiff’s case, asserting that plaintiff has not shown any right to relief on the facts and law.
granted if court concludes by the preponderance of the evidence. court evaluates plaintiff’s evidence without applying any special inferences in favor of plaintiffs
also, in favor of defendant for whom service has not been requested within 90 days, unless good cause shown. for this defendant, interruption of prescription considered never to have occurred.
also, if plaintiff fails to appear at trial
plaintiff has the right to a jury trial except
if there is no claim that rises to level of $50k
suits against a political subdivision (ie, city), but jury trials are allowed against the state.
**when to request jury trial
request must be made within 10 days of the filing of any pleading that raises an issue triable by jury
OR
within 10 days of the withdrawal of the other party’s request for trial by jury
2 types of challenges to a juror’s suitability to be selected
peremptory challenges
challenges for cause
peremptory challenges
if 12 member jury, get 6 peremptory challenges, up to 4 additional if multiple parties
if 6 member jury, get 3 peremptory challenges, up to 2 additional if multiple parties
peremptory challenge definition
a challenge to a juror that you can make without stating why you don’t want the juror, as long as not on any constitutionally impermissible basis
juror challenges for cause reasons
(1) lack legal qualifications
(2) juror has formed an opinion or is otherwise not impartial
(3) relations between juror and party or attorney would influence juror
(4) juror has been on a jury of a case with similar facts
(5) if the juror takes the 5th amendment on voir dire
time period for peremptory challenge
can be made up to the time the jury haas been accepted and sworn
challenges for cause time period
can be issued up to the time of taking of evidence
judge’s commentary in front of jury
cannot comment on the facts
can instruct jury throughout the trial
must instruct the jury on the law after the trial
during deliberations, jury has right to review evidence - specific rules
they may see any physical object or evidence brought to jury room
if they want to hear testimony again, they will be brought to the courtroom and that testimony transcript will be read to them