Trial Rights Flashcards
1
Q
Right to Evidentiary Disclosure
A
- prosecutor must disclose to a criminal defendant all material and exculpatory evidence (Brady)
2
Q
Right to Unbiased Judge
A
- Ds have the right to an unbiased judge, which means:
- he has no financial stake in the outcome of the case, and
- the judge has no actual malice towards the defendant
3
Q
When D has a right to jury
A
- right to a jury trial when the maximum authorized sentence exceeds six months
- right linked to punishment/statutory maximum
- Judge cannot sentence a defendant to more than six months if he had a right to a jury trial and did not receive one
4
Q
Minimum Number of Jurors Allowed in a Criminal Trial
A
6
5
Q
Unanimity of Jury Verdicts
A
- Jury verdicts in criminal trials must be unanimous only if 6 jurors are used. Verdicts in 12 person juries need not be unanimous.
6
Q
Cross-Sectional Requirement
A
- requires that the pool from which the jury is drawn represent a cross-section of the community.
- Therefore, a jury that contained all white women over 60 does not violate the cross-sectional requirement if the jury pool was diverse.
- But, if cannot get cross section not due to strategic plan or government policy, courts will likely uphold it.
7
Q
Peremptory Challenges
A
- Peremptory challenges
- permit both sides to exclude jurors without stating their reasons for doing so
- but they cannot be used by either side to exclude prospective jurors on account of race or gender
8
Q
Number of jurors for VA felony trials
A
12
9
Q
Number of jurors for VA misdemeanor trials
A
7
10
Q
Sentencing Power in VA
A
Juries generally sentence if the trial is by jury.
11
Q
VA Jury Verdict Requirements
A
- Criminal verdicts shall be:
- unanimous
- in writing; and
- returned by jury in open court.
12
Q
Challenging Jurors in VA
A
- challenges for good cause are unlimited
- peremptory:
- if felony- 4 challenges allowed
- 3 allowed for misdemeanor
13
Q
Right to Confront Adverse Witnesses
A
- 6th Am right doesn’t apply if face-to-face confrontation would go against public policy
- e.g. traumatizing a child witness
14
Q
Right to effective assistance of counsel
2-prong test
A
- requires proof that:
- counsel’s performance was deficient, and
- but for the deficiency, the outcome of the trial would have been different (the “prejudice” requirement).
15
Q
Effective Assistance of Counsel Examples
A
- deficiency standard example
- insufficient showing of deficiency where attorney took “cat naps” during trial but was otherwise effective
- prejudice standard example
- insufficient showing of prejudice where attorney slept through entire 15-minute testimony of a witness for the prosecution and thus could not engage in any cross-examination; no prejudice because the witness testified as to “non-contested matters” only.