Trial Flashcards

1
Q

What is the purpose of the ‘Trial’?

A

Determine D’s Guilt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does one address a ‘LAY MAGISTRATE’ in the Magistrates’ Court:
(1) Male
(2) Female
(3) Collectively

A

(1) Sir
(2) Madam
(3) Your Worships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How does one address a ‘DISTRICT JUDGE’ in the Magistrates’ Court?

A

Judge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does one address a ‘CIRCUIT JUDGE’ in the Crown Court?

A

Your Honour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does one address a ‘HIGH COURT JUDGE’ in the Crown Court:
(1) Male
(2) Female

A

(1) My Lord
(2) My Lady

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does one address the Prosecution’s advocate if:
(1) Solicitor
(2) Barrister

A

(1) My friend
(e.g. ‘My friend for the prosecution’)

(2) My learned friend
(e.g. ‘My friend for the defence’)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What 2 key areas must be determined re witnesses giving evidence at Trial?

A

(1) Competence
(2) Compellability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is meant by the terms:
(1) Competence
(2) Compellability

A

(1) Whether a witness is ABLE to give evidence
(2) Whether a witness can be REQUIRED to give evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If a witness is ‘NOT Competent’ can they be be ‘Complellable’

A

NO (must establish ‘competence’ before ‘compellability)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When considering whether a witness is ‘Competent’ or Compellable’ what are the 4 groups of witnesses that should be considered?

A

(1) Ordinary witness
(2) Defendant
(3) Co-Defendant
(4) D’s Spouse (/Civil Partner)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

For an ‘Ordinary Witness’ for BOTH PROSECUTION and DEFENCE:
(1) Competent (2 exceptions)
(2) Compellable

A

(1) Competent UNLESS:
(a) CANNOT understand question
(b) Give intelligible answers

(2) Compellable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

For an ‘Ordinary Witness’ NOT considered ‘Competent’ as they cannot understand the question and / or give intelligible answers (e.g. child / mentally incapable), what must be considered to assist them

A

Special Measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

For a ‘DEFENDANT’ are they ‘Competent’ and / or ‘Compellable’ for:
(1) Prosecution
(2) Defence

A

(1) PROSECUTION
(a) NOT Competent

(2) DEFENCE
(a) Competent
(b) NOT Compellable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If a D chooses not to provide evidence at Trial, what can be drawn?

A

Adverse Inference (s35 CJPOA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

(1) For a ‘CO-DEFENDANT’ are they ‘Competent’ and / or ‘Compellable’ for the PROSECUTION?

(2) What are the 2 exceptions to this?

A

(1) NEITHER ‘Competent’ or ‘Compellable’

(2)
(a) Jointly charged same crime + Co-D pleased ‘Guilty’ at an earlier hearing

(b) Tried Separately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

For a ‘CO-DEFENDANT’ are they ‘Competent’ and / or ‘Compellable’ for the DEFENCE?

A

Competent NOT Compellable

17
Q

For ‘D’s SPOUSE’ are they ‘Competent’ and / or ‘Compellable’ for:
(1) Prosecution (3 exceptions for ‘Compellability’)
(2) Defence

A

(1) PROSEUCTION
(a) Competent
(b) NOT Compellable
UNLESS
(a) Involves Children
(b) Domestic Violence
(c) Sexual

(2) DEFENCE
BOTH Competent and Compellable

18
Q

What is the 2 part test for whether a WITNESS is entitled to ‘Special Measures’?

A

(1) Is the witness VULNERABLE or INTIMIDATED?
(2) Would SM improve the QUALITY of Evidence?

19
Q

A Witness who is ‘VULNERABLE’ may be entitled to ‘Special Measures’.

What are the 2 ways a witness can be ‘Vulnerable’?

A

(1) MINOR (u18)
(2) MENTAL / PHYSICAL DISORDER reduce quality of evidence given

20
Q

Witness who is ‘INTIMIDATED’ may be entitled to ‘Special Measures’.

What does it mean for a witness to be ‘Intimidated’?

A

FEAR or DISTRESS reduce quality of evidence given

21
Q

What are 3 common examples of ‘Special Measures’ given to a vulnerable / intimidated witness?

A

(1) Evidence via LIVE VIDEO LINK
(2) VIDEO RECORDED Evidence-in-chief / cross-examination / re-examination
(3) INTERMEDIARY (e.g. signer for deaf person)

22
Q

What is the ONLY ‘Special Measure’ available to a DEFENDANT?

A

Evidence via LIVE VIDEO LINK

23
Q

What are the 8 main stages of the ‘Trial’ in the Magistrates’ Court?

A

(a) P’s Opening
(b) P’s Case
(c) (P’s Submission of ‘no case to answer’)
(d) Right of D to give Evidence
(e) D’s case
(f) AnyFurther Evidence
(g) P’s Closing Speech
(h) D’s Closing Speech

24
Q

At Trial in MC, following the ‘P’s Opening Speech’, will the D make one?

A

NO right to BUT can be invited

25
At Trial, what are the 3 main components of the 'Prosecution's Case' (1) X of X by X (2) Y of Y by Y (3) (optional) Z of Z by Z
(1) 'Examination-in-chief' of P's witnesses by P (2) 'Cross-Examination' of P's witnesses by D (3) (optional) 'Re-Examination' of P's witnesses by P
26
One stage of the Trial in MC is 'Right of D to give Evidence'. (1) Who is this right explained by? (2) What will be explained to D?
(1) Court Clerk at MC (2) Effect of NOT giving evidence (e.g. adverse inferences)
27
At a Trial, will 'Closing Speeches' be given by: (1) Prosecution (2) Defence
(1) Yes UNLESS D NOT legally represented (2) Yes (always)
28
In the MC, following the 'Verdict' at Trial: (1) What are the 2 potential outcomes (2) Must the court give reasons for the decision?
(1) (a) Convicted (b) Acquitted (2) (a) Convicted - MUST give reasons (b) Acquitted - MAY give reasons
29
If a D in the MC is 'Convicted' at the Trial what are the 2 options re Sentencing?
(1) Proceed IMMEDIATELY o sentencing (2) AJOURN for 'Pre-Sentence Reports'
30
What are the 8 main stages of the 'Trial' in the Crown Court?
(1) Jury Sworn in (12 jurors) (2) P's Opening (3) P's Case (4) (P's Submission of 'no case to answer') (5) CC ASKS D if have INTENTION give Evidence (6) D's Case (7) Any Further Evidence (8) P's Closing Speech (9) Summing Up (by Judge) (10) Jury Verdict
31
If the D believes P has produced weak evidence: (1) What can the P submit? (2) When is this GENERALLY done? (3) What 4 Offences are an exception to the rule in (2)?
(1) 'No Case To Answer' (2) End of P's Case (3) End of D's Case IF (a) Murder (b) Manslaughter (c) S20 GBH (d) S18 GBH
32
What is the effect of a P successfully submitting 'No Case To Answer' (1) MC (2) CC
(1) Magistrates' Acquit D (2) Judge direct Jury to Acquit D
33
When a Judge is determining whether to accept a submission of 'No Case To Answer' from which case is the Test derived?
R v Galbraith
34
The test for 'No Case To Answer' is derived from R v Galbraith. (1) What are the 2 elements of this test? (NOTE - only 1 element must be satisfied)
(1) NO EVIDENCE- No Evidence to prove an ESSENTIAL ELEMENT of the offence (i.e. AR / MR) OR (2) WEAK / TENUOUS EVIDENCE - Evidence 'so weak or tenuous that NO REASONABLE Jury would convict