Trial Flashcards
7 reasons to raise character evidence
all parties agree
adduced by D or given in answer to Q asked by D in cross examination and intended to elicit it
important explanatory evidence
relevant to an important matter in issue between P and D
substantial probative value in relation to an important matter in issue between D and coD
evidence to correct a false impression given by D
D has made an attack on another person’s character
meaning of relevant to an important matter in issue between D and P
- propensity to be untruthful (unless its not suggested Ds case is untruthful) shown by previous offence where D was untruthful or previous conviction where D pleaded NG, gave evidence and wasn’t believed.
- propensity to commit crime of same description or category or significant factual similarities (categories are theft and sexual) (unless makes it no more likely D is guilty)
unless too much time passed since past offence
when is character evidence contaminated
when witnesses collude to fabricate evidence
what happens if character evidence is contaminated
in CC judge can acquit or order retrial
procedure to rely on bad character evidence
serve notice of intention to use it on court and other parties and provide written record of previous convictions
how can D oppose the use of bad character evidence
apply to court for it to be excluded, send application to court and other parties
which bad character evidence gateways can only be used by P
important explanatory evidence
correct false impression given by D
D attacked anothers character
which bad character evidence gateway can only be used by D
matter in issue between D and Co-D
when can the court exclude bad character evidence
it would have such an adverse effect on fairness of procedings that it ought not to be included
order of trial at MC
PS case: opening speech and witnesses poss no case to answer Ds case and witness (d first witness) Ps closing speech Ds closing speech verdict sentencing
order of trial at CC
poss preliminary hearing arraignment at PTPH jury sworn in aka empannelled Ps case: opening and witnesses poss no case to answer Ds case Ps closing speech Ds closing speech Judge summing up verdict sentencing
if D gives evidence as a witness when should they be called in the order of witnesses
first
how can D change plea
apply in writing asap
what is included in judges summing up
law and evidence
law - burden and standard of proof, requirements of offence and other issues raised in case
evidence - facts to be determined, evidence and arguments raised, inferences from facts
can judge require jury to take longer than 2.10 hrs
yes
if found NG do you pay costs
no, if no legal aid then judge orders costs to be paid by state
what if jury cannot reach verdict in reasonable time
judge will discharge them and P will order retrial
examination in chief
cannot ask leading Qs, only open Qs
ask Qs to witness to repeat whats in witness statement - they tell their story
leading Q
suggestive of answer
cross examination
put case to witness and Ds defence or cannot rely on it later
undermine credibility
obtain favourable evidence
can use closed and leading questions
putting your case
suggest alternative version of events - must put Ds defence in cross examination or cannot rely on it in their own evidence
re-examination
party who called witness can ask more Qs re matters that arose in cross examination
only open non-leading questions
min age to give evidence at trial
any age - but under 14 give unsworn evidence
any age must be able to understand the seriousness or matter and responsibility to tell truth - assumed unless evidence to contrary
what ages are competent
all ages are competent
who is a compellable witness
any competent person
compellable
can be summoned and compelled to testify
impact of failing to attend or attending but refusing to answer Q
contempt of court
when is a person not competent to be a witness
unable to understand Qs and give answers that can be understood