Trespass to Person Flashcards
What is trespass to person?
This is a tort that seeks to protect an individual against an infringement of their personal or bodily integrity.
These include:
Battery
Assault
False Imprisonment
What do these three torts have in common?
1) D must have intended the conduct and consequences of their actions
2) Ds actions must cause direct of immediate harm
3) these are actionable without proof of loss.
What is Assault?
Goff LJ defines this in Collins v Wilcock as:
‘an act which causes another person to apprehend the infliction of immediate, unlawful force on his person’
What is Battery?
Goff LJ defined this in Collins v Wilcock as:
‘the actual infliction of unlawful force on another person’
It is the intentional application of unlawful force to another person - physical interference with claimants body
This is any unwanted touching
What is False Imprisonment?
Goff LJ defined this in Collins v Wilcock as:
‘the unlawful imposition of constraint on another’s freedom of movement from a particular place’
Is there a new tort?
Wilkinson v Downton has established a new tort.
This provides a remedy for those who suffered physical or psychiatric injury as a result of another intentional conduct.
What is the difference between negligence and trespass to person?
The difference between them is intention.
Trespass compensates an individual in relation to direct and intentional harm- this is for a deliberate hit
Negligence compensates an individual for unintentional or indirect harm- so an accidental injury
Why is intention very important?
In trespass, if there is no intention, D will not be liable because their actions may not have been intended.
Letang v Cooper
Man drives over girl sunbathing- here he had no intention so only cause of action here is in negligence.
No intention- negligence
Intention- Trespass
Reinforced in Iqbal v Prison Officers
prisoners in cells due to officers on strike
they said: ‘it is well established that all forms of trespass require an intention act. An act of negligence will not suffice’
What are the requirements for battery?
1) intentional application
2) of unlawful force
3) which is direct and immediate
4) for which D has no lawful justification or excuse
What is the first requirement for battery?
Intentional application
There needs to be an intention
If D intended to punch A but ends up punching B, then they will still be liable by virtue of transferred intent: Livingstone v Ministry of Defence
They will still be liable even if they didn’t intend harm: Williams v Humphrey - D pushed C in swimming pool. C breaks ankle. D said not intended.
If Ds actions are originally unintentional but when realising doesn’t stop, they will be liable; Fagan v Met Police Commissioner- driving car on officers foot
What is the second requirement for battery?
There must be unlawful touching
Battery covers all forms of contact
Goff LJ in Collins v Wilcock said unlawful touching is physical contact that does not fall in the category of physical contact ‘generally acceptable in the ordinary conduct of daily life’
i.e touching on busy touch won’t amount to battery
What is the third requirement of battery?
There has to be direct and immediate force. It has to happen at the time.
if you throw a log at someone to hit them vs if someone later falls over the log
this is difference between battery and negligence
What are the requirements for assault?
this is not physical contact but the anticipation of such contact that makes for assault.
So C must anticipate battery by D- C thinking D will hit them
Requirements:
1) D intends C to apprehend application of unlawful force
2) C reasonable apprehends this
3) D has no lawful justification or excuse
What is the first requirement for Assault?
Intention
D must intend to cause claimant to apprehend immediate unlawful force.
must make them believe they are going to hit them
What is the second requirement for assault?
C must reasonably apprehend that D is going to hit them
they should really think D will hit them
Stephens v Myers
D being disruptive in meeting and threatened C with violence. D was walking up to C with clenched fist but stopped. D liable for assault